Liberal Versus Restrictive Fluid Protocols in Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The term acute kidney injury (AKI) is used to describe a rapid deterioration (hours to days) of renal function. This rapid deterioration leads to accumulation of plasma waste products, such as urea and creatinine. Accumulation of urea and other nitrogen-containing substances in the blood stream lead to a number of symptoms, such as fatigue, loss of appetite, headache, nausea and vomiting. Marked increases in the potassium level can lead to irregularities in the heartbeat, which can be severe and life-threatening. Fluid balance is frequently affected, though blood pressure can be high, low or normal. Pain in the flanks may be encountered in some conditions (such as thrombosis of the renal blood vessels or inflammation of the kidney); this is the result of stretching of the fibrous tissue capsule surrounding the kidney. Perioperative AKI is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality; It is associated with increased risk of sepsis, anemia, coagulopathy, and mechanical ventilation. The first publication of consensus criteria for AKI was published in 2004. The system was named RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function and end-stage renal failure) and used sCr or urine output to define AKI. Later, in 2007, a modified definition of the RIFLE criteria was published by the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) .Although the AKIN criteria evolved from the RIFLE criteria, a major advance was the understanding that even small changes in sCr concentrations are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The AKIN criteria allowed definition of AKI even without knowledge of baseline sCr. In 2012, a clinical practice guideline of AKI was proposed by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Foundation. The guideline included a comprehensive review of AKI definition, risk assessment, diagnosis, prevention, treatment and renal replacement therapy. A common practice to maintain effective blood volume and thus kidney perfusion is intravenous (I.V.) hydration. Correcting hypovolemia is an essential perioperative hemodynamic goal and appropriate hydration is considered important for the avoidance of AKI. Perioperative fluid therapy has been studied extensively, but the optimal strategy remains controversial and uncertain. Much of the current debate surrounds the type of fluids administered (colloid versus crystalloid), the total volume administered (restrictive versus liberal), and whether the administration of fluids should be guided by hemodynamic goals (goal directed \[GD\] versus not goal directed). Administering a large amount of I.V. fluid in the perioperative period is a common clinical practice. Although fluid loading may expand intravascular space, improve organ perfusion or tissue oxygenation and reduce minor postoperative complications in laparoscopic surgery, excessive fluid may also increase some perioperative complications. Intraoperative urine output is often monitored but rarely responds to fluid administration. Clearance of fluid during general anesthesia is only a small fraction of that observed in conscious volunteers. Infusion of crystalloids during anesthesia shows reduced clearance and slower distribution such that intraoperative oliguria may not reflect fluid status or predict future AKI. Given that liberal fluid administration can be correlated with worse postoperative outcome, the recommendation to maintain urine output of at least 0.5 ml/kg/h should be considered.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jan 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 5, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2019
CompletedJuly 9, 2019
July 1, 2019
1.4 years
April 14, 2018
July 7, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
serum creatinine
mg/dl
5 days postoperative
urine output
ml
5 days postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (3)
SBP, DBP, MAP
24 hours
arterial oxygen saturation
24 hours
heart rate
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Ringer's lactate 18-20 ml/kg
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be randomly allocated into two groups of 40 patients each: Group L:will receive 18-20 ml/kg/h of Ringer's lactate starting from conduction of spinal anesthesia.
Ringer's lactate 4-6 ml/kg
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be randomly allocated into two groups of 40 patients each: Group R: will receive 4-6 ml/kg/h of Ringer's lactate starting from conduction of spinal anesthesia.
Interventions
Randomization will be done using computer generated table of random numbers in a 1:1 ratio and will be conducted using sequentially numbered, opaque and sealed envelope. The trial will be planned that neither the doctors (investigators) nor the patients will be aware of the group allocation and amount of fluid received. Intraoperative and postoperative data collections will be achieved by the same blinded anesthiologist. Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups: Group L: 40 patients who will be subjected to ''liberal" approach of intraoperative 18-20 ml/kg/h of Ringer's lactate starting from conduction of spinal anesthesia. Group R: 40 patients who will be subjected to ''restrictive" approach of intraoperative 4-6 ml/kg/h of Ringer's lactate starting from conduction of spinal anesthesia. Blood loss will be replaced if more than 500 ml in a ratio of 3 ml crystalloid: 1 ml blood.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults 18-50 years scheduled for unilateral orthopedic lower limb surgery
- ASA I and II
- Gender: both
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- Hypersensitivity to any local anesthetics
- Bleeding diathesis
- Skin lesions or wounds at the puncture site of the proposed block
- Psychiatric disorders
- Failed intra-thecal anesthesia or inadequate sensory block for surgery requiring conversion to general anesthesia
- Pregnancy
- Chronic kidney disease
- Diabetes mellitus, chronic heart, lung or liver disease
- Hemodynamic instability (intra and/or post-operative)
- Burn injury, usage of x-ray contrast and sepsis.
- Morbid obesity
- Corticosteroid usage
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut University Hospital
Asyut, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
ragaa herdan, lecturer
Assiut University, Faculty of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Randomization will be done using computer generated table of random numbers in a 1:1 ratio and will be conducted using sequentially numbered, opaque and sealed envelope. The trial will be planned that neither the doctors (investigators) nor the patients will be aware of the group allocation and amount of fluid received. Intraoperative and postoperative data collections will be achieved by the same blinded anesthiologist.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer of anesthesia and intensive care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2018
First Posted
October 5, 2018
Study Start
January 28, 2018
Primary Completion
June 30, 2019
Study Completion
June 30, 2019
Last Updated
July 9, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share