NCT03697330

Brief Summary

The term acute kidney injury (AKI) is used to describe a rapid deterioration (hours to days) of renal function. This rapid deterioration leads to accumulation of plasma waste products, such as urea and creatinine. Accumulation of urea and other nitrogen-containing substances in the blood stream lead to a number of symptoms, such as fatigue, loss of appetite, headache, nausea and vomiting. Marked increases in the potassium level can lead to irregularities in the heartbeat, which can be severe and life-threatening. Fluid balance is frequently affected, though blood pressure can be high, low or normal. Pain in the flanks may be encountered in some conditions (such as thrombosis of the renal blood vessels or inflammation of the kidney); this is the result of stretching of the fibrous tissue capsule surrounding the kidney. Perioperative AKI is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality; It is associated with increased risk of sepsis, anemia, coagulopathy, and mechanical ventilation. The first publication of consensus criteria for AKI was published in 2004. The system was named RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function and end-stage renal failure) and used sCr or urine output to define AKI. Later, in 2007, a modified definition of the RIFLE criteria was published by the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) .Although the AKIN criteria evolved from the RIFLE criteria, a major advance was the understanding that even small changes in sCr concentrations are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The AKIN criteria allowed definition of AKI even without knowledge of baseline sCr. In 2012, a clinical practice guideline of AKI was proposed by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Foundation. The guideline included a comprehensive review of AKI definition, risk assessment, diagnosis, prevention, treatment and renal replacement therapy. A common practice to maintain effective blood volume and thus kidney perfusion is intravenous (I.V.) hydration. Correcting hypovolemia is an essential perioperative hemodynamic goal and appropriate hydration is considered important for the avoidance of AKI. Perioperative fluid therapy has been studied extensively, but the optimal strategy remains controversial and uncertain. Much of the current debate surrounds the type of fluids administered (colloid versus crystalloid), the total volume administered (restrictive versus liberal), and whether the administration of fluids should be guided by hemodynamic goals (goal directed \[GD\] versus not goal directed). Administering a large amount of I.V. fluid in the perioperative period is a common clinical practice. Although fluid loading may expand intravascular space, improve organ perfusion or tissue oxygenation and reduce minor postoperative complications in laparoscopic surgery, excessive fluid may also increase some perioperative complications. Intraoperative urine output is often monitored but rarely responds to fluid administration. Clearance of fluid during general anesthesia is only a small fraction of that observed in conscious volunteers. Infusion of crystalloids during anesthesia shows reduced clearance and slower distribution such that intraoperative oliguria may not reflect fluid status or predict future AKI. Given that liberal fluid administration can be correlated with worse postoperative outcome, the recommendation to maintain urine output of at least 0.5 ml/kg/h should be considered.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 28, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 14, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 5, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 9, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

April 14, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 7, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

liberal, restrictive, fluid, RIFLE

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • serum creatinine

    mg/dl

    5 days postoperative

  • urine output

    ml

    5 days postoperative

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • SBP, DBP, MAP

    24 hours

  • arterial oxygen saturation

    24 hours

  • heart rate

    24 hours

Study Arms (2)

Ringer's lactate 18-20 ml/kg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups of 40 patients each: Group L:will receive 18-20 ml/kg/h of Ringer's lactate starting from conduction of spinal anesthesia.

Drug: Ringer lactate

Ringer's lactate 4-6 ml/kg

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups of 40 patients each: Group R: will receive 4-6 ml/kg/h of Ringer's lactate starting from conduction of spinal anesthesia.

Drug: Ringer lactate

Interventions

Randomization will be done using computer generated table of random numbers in a 1:1 ratio and will be conducted using sequentially numbered, opaque and sealed envelope. The trial will be planned that neither the doctors (investigators) nor the patients will be aware of the group allocation and amount of fluid received. Intraoperative and postoperative data collections will be achieved by the same blinded anesthiologist. Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups: Group L: 40 patients who will be subjected to ''liberal" approach of intraoperative 18-20 ml/kg/h of Ringer's lactate starting from conduction of spinal anesthesia. Group R: 40 patients who will be subjected to ''restrictive" approach of intraoperative 4-6 ml/kg/h of Ringer's lactate starting from conduction of spinal anesthesia. Blood loss will be replaced if more than 500 ml in a ratio of 3 ml crystalloid: 1 ml blood.

Also known as: lactated ringers solution
Ringer's lactate 18-20 ml/kgRinger's lactate 4-6 ml/kg

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults 18-50 years scheduled for unilateral orthopedic lower limb surgery
  • ASA I and II
  • Gender: both

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refusal
  • Hypersensitivity to any local anesthetics
  • Bleeding diathesis
  • Skin lesions or wounds at the puncture site of the proposed block
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Failed intra-thecal anesthesia or inadequate sensory block for surgery requiring conversion to general anesthesia
  • Pregnancy
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Diabetes mellitus, chronic heart, lung or liver disease
  • Hemodynamic instability (intra and/or post-operative)
  • Burn injury, usage of x-ray contrast and sepsis.
  • Morbid obesity
  • Corticosteroid usage

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assiut University Hospital

Asyut, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intraoperative Complications

Interventions

Ringer's Lactate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Crystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsSolutionsPharmaceutical Preparations

Study Officials

  • ragaa herdan, lecturer

    Assiut University, Faculty of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Randomization will be done using computer generated table of random numbers in a 1:1 ratio and will be conducted using sequentially numbered, opaque and sealed envelope. The trial will be planned that neither the doctors (investigators) nor the patients will be aware of the group allocation and amount of fluid received. Intraoperative and postoperative data collections will be achieved by the same blinded anesthiologist.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: comparing the effect of two different protocols of fluid therapy (liberal versus restrictive) in adult patients undergoing unilateral orthopedic lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
lecturer of anesthesia and intensive care

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2018

First Posted

October 5, 2018

Study Start

January 28, 2018

Primary Completion

June 30, 2019

Study Completion

June 30, 2019

Last Updated

July 9, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations