Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of realSKIN® (Skin Xenotransplant) for Complete Closure of Severe Burn Wounds
An Open-label Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of realSKIN® (Skin Xenotransplant) for Complete Closure of Severe and Extensive Deep-Partial and Full-Thickness Burn Wounds
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a Phase 1/2, Open-label, Multi-center, Clinical Trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of realSKIN® to provide complete wound closure of severe and extensive deep-partial and full-thickness burn wounds. Approximately 25 total subjects will be enrolled. Subjects who meet eligibility criteria and provide written informed consent will receive realSKIN® placement at a single burn wound site. The designated realSKIN® product size will be placed on the burn wound following wound site preparation, including necessary debridement and tangential excision as determined by burn surgeon and secured in place via suturing or stapling. The remaining burn wound will be covered with human cadaver allograft and treated according to local standard of care with care to avoid any overlap or significant contact of the two temporary wound dressings. The Investigator will assess the wounds and identify the matched pair of burn sites then the treatments will be randomly assigned to the sites. realSKIN® will remain in place until intentional removal per Investigator's direction consistent with subject's overall clinical course, or if it is deemed to no longer provide effective wound closure and barrier function to the wound bed. The Investigator will follow local standard of care relevant to wound care and dressing changes while the realSKIN® is in place. Standard of care burn management will be provided by the Investigator. Routine vital sign assessments, photography, laboratory tests (hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis), physical exams, and adverse event monitoring will occur while realSKIN® is in place and for up to 1 year following initial placement. Subjects will be monitored via a passive and active screening program using blood samples collected at time points throughout the study period, as adapted from FDA Guidance for Industry. The risk of transmission of infectious disease is expected to be extremely low and while limited human trial data are available there have been no reports of transmission of porcine microorganisms to humans, and to date, there have been no adverse events (AEs) related to the use of realSKIN® observed or reported, and independent analysis of PERV data and medical records by the Safety Review Committee has indicated no evidence of zoonotic transmission in this trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_1
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2023
CompletedJanuary 12, 2024
December 1, 2023
4.8 years
September 28, 2018
January 11, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Temporary Wound Closure
To assess the capability of realSKIN® to improve wound healing by providing supportive care until definitive closure can be accomplished by functioning as a barrier, much like human skin, as compared to similar wound site(s) treated with human cadaver allograft (HCA).
Prior to autograft placement (within 14 days)
Long-term Safety and Tolerability
To further demonstrate the long-term safety and tolerability of realSKIN®, to include evidence that Xeno-Skin® does not significantly impede wound healing.
Prior to autograft placement (continued follow up through 6 months)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Definitive Wound Closure
Post autograft placement (continued follow up through 1 year)
Improved Wound Healing
Post autograft placement (continued follow up through 1 year)
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Treatment: realSKIN (skin xenotransplant)
EXPERIMENTALIn the experimental arm, patients are treated with the investigational drug, realSKIN®, in a side-by-side comparison to the active comparator, thus, each patient serves as their own control. The designated realSKIN® product size will be placed on the burn wound and secured in place via suturing or stapling. The Investigator will assess the wounds and identify the matched pair of burn sites then the treatments will be randomly assigned to the sites.
Active Comparator: Human Allograft Skin
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the active comparator arm, patients are treated with human cadaver allograft, in a side-by-side comparison to the investigational drug, thus, each patient serves as their own control. The allograft active comparator will be placed adjacently to the investigational drug, in the same anatomical location, on wound sites following debridement and secured via suture or staples. All other treatment aspects were consistent with the standard of care. The Investigator will assess the wounds and identify the matched pair of burn sites then the treatments will be randomly assigned to the sites.
Interventions
3+3 Dose-escalation Study Design; 2 dosage strengths will be utilized during this Phase 1/2 Trial; an expansion cohort (9 patients) receive the highest dose.
HCA is used as a temporary wound dressing between debridement and definitive closure in many well-resourced contexts.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject provides written informed consent to participate in this study
- Males or females age greater than 18 years old
- Females must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening and at Baseline and must not be nursing
- Male and female subjects must agree to use a protocol-approved method of contraception for a minimum of 3 months following Xeno-Skin® placement, which includes a barrier method plus one or more of the following:
- Hormonal contraceptives (e.g., birth control pills, skin patches, vaginal rings, and the Depo- Provera shot)
- Intrauterine device (IUD)
- Male or female condoms with spermicide
- Diaphragm with spermicide
- Permanent tubal occlusive birth control system
- Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) \<30%, to include deep-partial thickness or full-thickness burn wounds
- Burn injuries would otherwise require debridement and tangential excision
- Burn injury requiring temporary grafting with human cadaver allograft skin, based on clinical judgment prior to definitive wound closure via autologous grafting
- Sufficient area of burn wound for Xeno-Skin® placement and not located on face or hands or having an engraftment site centered on high-impact areas such as joints, weight-bearing areas (e.g. soles of feet), or the inguinal region, per Investigator's judgment
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Documented history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or other condition(s) that in the opinion of the Investigator may compromise patient safety or study objectives
- Immunosuppressive medication regimens e.g. antineoplastics, high dose steroids (\> 10 mg prednisone/day), TNF alpha inhibitors, calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine, tacrolimus), anti-proliferative agents, and other immunomodulators
- Known allergy to penicillins (such as ampicillin), ceftazidime or aztreonam, glycopeptide antibiotics (such as vancomycin) or amphotericin B
- Active malignancy, including those requiring surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation in the past 5 years. Non-metastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and cervical carcinoma in situ are allowed
- Use of any experimental or investigational drugs within 30 days prior to placement of Xeno-Skin®
- Previously received a porcine or other xenogeneic tissue product, including but not limited to: glutaraldehyde fixed porcine or bovine bioprosthetic heart valve replacements and glutaraldehyde fixed porcine dermal matrix (e.g., EZ Derm)
- BMI \> 40 kg/m2
- HbA1c ≥ 7.0%
- Treatment with systemic corticosteroids within 30 days before screening (not including inhaled steroids)
- Electrical, chemical, or radiation burns
- History of chronic end stage renal disease defined as an MDRD CrCl \< 15 mL/min, or receiving chronic dialysis
- History of chronic liver disease or cirrhosis (Child-Pugh Score C). Evidence of acute or chronic hepatitis B infection based on documented HBV serology testing
- Known documented history of Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Treponema pallidum, Cytomegalovirus, herpes or varicella zoster Note: Successfully treated hepatitis C patients without evidence of end stage liver disease is allowed. If HCV antibody reactive, then HCV RNA must be undetectable.
- Recent (within 3 months prior to study enrollment) MI, unstable angina leading to hospitalization, uncontrolled, CABG, PCI, carotid surgery or stenting, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack (TIA), endovascular procedure or surgical intervention for peripheral vascular disease or plans to undergo a major surgical or interventional procedure (eg, PCI, CABG, carotid or peripheral revascularization)
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- XenoTherapeutics, Inc.lead
- Massachusetts General Hospitalcollaborator
- Joseph M. Still Research Foundation, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (2)
JMS Burn Center at Doctors Hospital
Augusta, Georgia, 30909, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Related Publications (34)
Albritton A, Leonard DA, Leto Barone A, Keegan J, Mallard C, Sachs DH, Kurtz JM, Cetrulo CL Jr. Lack of cross-sensitization between alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout porcine and allogeneic skin grafts permits serial grafting. Transplantation. 2014 Jun 27;97(12):1209-15. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000093.
PMID: 24798308BACKGROUNDBruccoleri RE, Matthew MK, Schulz JT. Methods in obtaining split-thickness skin grafts from skin reduction surgery specimens. Springerplus. 2016 May 25;5(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2330-2. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27350924BACKGROUNDBurd A, Chiu T. Allogenic skin in the treatment of burns. Clin Dermatol. 2005 Jul-Aug;23(4):376-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.07.019.
PMID: 16023933BACKGROUNDDenner J. Paving the Path toward Porcine Organs for Transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1891-1893. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcibr1710853. No abstract available.
PMID: 29117497BACKGROUNDDeschamps JY, Roux FA, Sai P, Gouin E. History of xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2005 Mar;12(2):91-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2004.00199.x.
PMID: 15693840BACKGROUNDEricsson TA, Takeuchi Y, Templin C, Quinn G, Farhadian SF, Wood JC, Oldmixon BA, Suling KM, Ishii JK, Kitagawa Y, Miyazawa T, Salomon DR, Weiss RA, Patience C. Identification of receptors for pig endogenous retrovirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 27;100(11):6759-64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1138025100. Epub 2003 May 9.
PMID: 12740431BACKGROUNDFishman JA. Screening of source animals and clinical monitoring for xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2007, 349-352.
BACKGROUNDFishman JA, Scobie L, Takeuchi Y. Xenotransplantation-associated infectious risk: a WHO consultation. Xenotransplantation. 2012 Mar-Apr;19(2):72-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2012.00693.x.
PMID: 22497509BACKGROUNDGodehardt AW, Rodrigues Costa M, Tonjes RR. Review on porcine endogenous retrovirus detection assays--impact on quality and safety of xenotransplants. Xenotransplantation. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(2):95-101. doi: 10.1111/xen.12154. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
PMID: 25641488BACKGROUNDHerndon DN. Total Burn Care, Expert Consult - Online. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
BACKGROUNDJohnson RM, Richard R. Partial-thickness burns: identification and management. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003 Jul-Aug;16(4):178-87; quiz 188-9. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200307000-00010.
PMID: 12897674BACKGROUNDKitala D, Kawecki M, Klama-Baryla A, Labus W, Kraut M, Glik J, Ryszkiel I, Kawecki MP, Nowak M. Allogeneic vs. Autologous Skin Grafts in the Therapy of Patients with Burn Injuries: A Restrospective, Open-label Clinical Study with Pair Matching. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;25(5):923-929. doi: 10.17219/acem/61961.
PMID: 28028957BACKGROUNDLeonard DA, Mallard C, Albritton A, Torabi R, Mastroianni M, Sachs DH, Kurtz JM, Cetrulo CL Jr. Skin grafts from genetically modified alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout miniature swine: A functional equivalent to allografts. Burns. 2017 Dec;43(8):1717-1724. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.04.026. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
PMID: 28602591BACKGROUNDLeto Barone AA, Mastroianni M, Farkash EA, Mallard C, Albritton A, Torabi R, Leonard DA, Kurtz JM, Sachs DH, Cetrulo CL Jr. Genetically modified porcine split-thickness skin grafts as an alternative to allograft for provision of temporary wound coverage: preliminary characterization. Burns. 2015 May;41(3):565-74. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
PMID: 25406888BACKGROUNDOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network. (n.d.). Retrieved May 01, 2017, from https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/
BACKGROUNDMartin SI, Wilkinson R, Fishman JA. Genomic presence of recombinant porcine endogenous retrovirus in transmitting miniature swine. Virol J. 2006 Nov 2;3:91. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-3-91.
PMID: 17081300BACKGROUNDMeije Y, Tonjes RR, Fishman JA. Retroviral restriction factors and infectious risk in xenotransplantation. Am J Transplant. 2010 Jul;10(7):1511-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03146.x.
PMID: 20642677BACKGROUNDMorozov VA, Wynyard S, Matsumoto S, Abalovich A, Denner J, Elliott R. No PERV transmission during a clinical trial of pig islet cell transplantation. Virus Res. 2017 Jan 2;227:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
PMID: 27677465BACKGROUNDParadis K, Langford G, Long Z, Heneine W, Sandstrom P, Switzer WM, Chapman LE, Lockey C, Onions D, Otto E. Search for cross-species transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus in patients treated with living pig tissue. The XEN 111 Study Group. Science. 1999 Aug 20;285(5431):1236-41. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5431.1236.
PMID: 10455044BACKGROUNDPatience C, Takeuchi Y, Weiss RA. Infection of human cells by an endogenous retrovirus of pigs. Nat Med. 1997 Mar;3(3):282-6. doi: 10.1038/nm0397-282.
PMID: 9055854BACKGROUNDSachs DH. The lure of transplantation. Clin Transpl. 2008:287-305. No abstract available.
PMID: 19708462BACKGROUNDSchaffer A. Cadaver Skin Fills the Gap in Burn Cases. New York Times. May 2, 2006.
BACKGROUNDSen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, Kirsner R, Lambert L, Hunt TK, Gottrup F, Gurtner GC, Longaker MT. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Nov-Dec;17(6):763-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x.
PMID: 19903300BACKGROUNDSheridan RL, Tompkins RG. Skin substitutes in burns. Burns. 1999 Mar;25(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(98)00176-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 10208382BACKGROUNDShi M, Wang X, Okamoto M, Takao S, Baba M. Inhibition of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) replication by HIV-1 gene expression inhibitors. Antiviral Res. 2009 Aug;83(2):201-4. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.04.011. Epub 2009 May 3.
PMID: 19414036BACKGROUNDThorton JF and Gosman AA. Skin Grafts and Skin Substitutes. Baylor University Medical Center. 2004 10(1): 2-78
BACKGROUNDWeiner J, Yamada K, Ishikawa Y, Moran S, Etter J, Shimizu A, Smith RN, Sachs DH. Prolonged survival of GalT-KO swine skin on baboons. Xenotransplantation. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):147-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2010.00576.x.
PMID: 20522247BACKGROUNDWilhelm M, Fishman JA, Pontikis R, Aubertin AM, Wilhelm FX. Susceptibility of recombinant porcine endogenous retrovirus reverse transcriptase to nucleoside and non-nucleoside inhibitors. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002 Dec;59(12):2184-90. doi: 10.1007/s000180200017.
PMID: 12568344BACKGROUNDWood JC, Quinn G, Suling KM, Oldmixon BA, Van Tine BA, Cina R, Arn S, Huang CA, Scobie L, Onions DE, Sachs DH, Schuurman HJ, Fishman JA, Patience C. Identification of exogenous forms of human-tropic porcine endogenous retrovirus in miniature Swine. J Virol. 2004 Mar;78(5):2494-501. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.5.2494-2501.2004.
PMID: 14963150BACKGROUNDWorld Health Organization Burn Fact Sheet. http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/burns. March 6, 2018.
BACKGROUNDWynyard S, Nathu D, Garkavenko O, Denner J, Elliott R. Microbiological safety of the first clinical pig islet xenotransplantation trial in New Zealand. Xenotransplantation. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):309-23. doi: 10.1111/xen.12102. Epub 2014 May 7.
PMID: 24801820BACKGROUNDYue S, Zhang Y, Gao Y. A study on the susceptibility of allogeneic human hepatocytes to porcine endogenous retrovirus. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Sep;19(18):3486-91.
PMID: 26439047BACKGROUNDHolzer PW, Leonard DA, Shanmugarajah K, Moulton KN, Ng ZY, Cetrulo CL Jr, Sachs DH. A Comparative Examination of the Clinical Outcome and Histological Appearance of Cryopreserved and Fresh Split-Thickness Skin Grafts. J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e55-e61. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000431.
PMID: 27606556BACKGROUNDWu D, Zhao XS, Zhao HF, Xie JH, Wei HJ, Zhu NW. New Hope for the Treatment of Severe Skin Injury: Genetically Engineered Porcine Skin Xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2025 May-Jun;32(3):e70057. doi: 10.1111/xen.70057.
PMID: 40407357DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeremy Goverman, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2018
First Posted
October 4, 2018
Study Start
March 15, 2019
Primary Completion
December 30, 2023
Study Completion
December 30, 2023
Last Updated
January 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share