NCT03695939

Brief Summary

This is a Phase 1/2, Open-label, Multi-center, Clinical Trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of realSKIN® to provide complete wound closure of severe and extensive deep-partial and full-thickness burn wounds. Approximately 25 total subjects will be enrolled. Subjects who meet eligibility criteria and provide written informed consent will receive realSKIN® placement at a single burn wound site. The designated realSKIN® product size will be placed on the burn wound following wound site preparation, including necessary debridement and tangential excision as determined by burn surgeon and secured in place via suturing or stapling. The remaining burn wound will be covered with human cadaver allograft and treated according to local standard of care with care to avoid any overlap or significant contact of the two temporary wound dressings. The Investigator will assess the wounds and identify the matched pair of burn sites then the treatments will be randomly assigned to the sites. realSKIN® will remain in place until intentional removal per Investigator's direction consistent with subject's overall clinical course, or if it is deemed to no longer provide effective wound closure and barrier function to the wound bed. The Investigator will follow local standard of care relevant to wound care and dressing changes while the realSKIN® is in place. Standard of care burn management will be provided by the Investigator. Routine vital sign assessments, photography, laboratory tests (hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis), physical exams, and adverse event monitoring will occur while realSKIN® is in place and for up to 1 year following initial placement. Subjects will be monitored via a passive and active screening program using blood samples collected at time points throughout the study period, as adapted from FDA Guidance for Industry. The risk of transmission of infectious disease is expected to be extremely low and while limited human trial data are available there have been no reports of transmission of porcine microorganisms to humans, and to date, there have been no adverse events (AEs) related to the use of realSKIN® observed or reported, and independent analysis of PERV data and medical records by the Safety Review Committee has indicated no evidence of zoonotic transmission in this trial.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2019

Longer than P75 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 28, 2018

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 4, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 15, 2019

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

January 12, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

September 28, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 11, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

xenotransplantskinburnstemporaryallograftporcineclosuredressinglive biotherapeuticxenograftpiggenetically engineeredalpha-GalGalT-KO

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Temporary Wound Closure

    To assess the capability of realSKIN® to improve wound healing by providing supportive care until definitive closure can be accomplished by functioning as a barrier, much like human skin, as compared to similar wound site(s) treated with human cadaver allograft (HCA).

    Prior to autograft placement (within 14 days)

  • Long-term Safety and Tolerability

    To further demonstrate the long-term safety and tolerability of realSKIN®, to include evidence that Xeno-Skin® does not significantly impede wound healing.

    Prior to autograft placement (continued follow up through 6 months)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Definitive Wound Closure

    Post autograft placement (continued follow up through 1 year)

  • Improved Wound Healing

    Post autograft placement (continued follow up through 1 year)

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Treatment: realSKIN (skin xenotransplant)

EXPERIMENTAL

In the experimental arm, patients are treated with the investigational drug, realSKIN®, in a side-by-side comparison to the active comparator, thus, each patient serves as their own control. The designated realSKIN® product size will be placed on the burn wound and secured in place via suturing or stapling. The Investigator will assess the wounds and identify the matched pair of burn sites then the treatments will be randomly assigned to the sites.

Biological: realSKIN (skin xenotransplant)

Active Comparator: Human Allograft Skin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the active comparator arm, patients are treated with human cadaver allograft, in a side-by-side comparison to the investigational drug, thus, each patient serves as their own control. The allograft active comparator will be placed adjacently to the investigational drug, in the same anatomical location, on wound sites following debridement and secured via suture or staples. All other treatment aspects were consistent with the standard of care. The Investigator will assess the wounds and identify the matched pair of burn sites then the treatments will be randomly assigned to the sites.

Biological: Human Cadaver Allograft

Interventions

3+3 Dose-escalation Study Design; 2 dosage strengths will be utilized during this Phase 1/2 Trial; an expansion cohort (9 patients) receive the highest dose.

Experimental Treatment: realSKIN (skin xenotransplant)

HCA is used as a temporary wound dressing between debridement and definitive closure in many well-resourced contexts.

Also known as: Human Allograft Skin, HCA
Active Comparator: Human Allograft Skin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The subject provides written informed consent to participate in this study
  • Males or females age greater than 18 years old
  • Females must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening and at Baseline and must not be nursing
  • Male and female subjects must agree to use a protocol-approved method of contraception for a minimum of 3 months following Xeno-Skin® placement, which includes a barrier method plus one or more of the following:
  • Hormonal contraceptives (e.g., birth control pills, skin patches, vaginal rings, and the Depo- Provera shot)
  • Intrauterine device (IUD)
  • Male or female condoms with spermicide
  • Diaphragm with spermicide
  • Permanent tubal occlusive birth control system
  • Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) \<30%, to include deep-partial thickness or full-thickness burn wounds
  • Burn injuries would otherwise require debridement and tangential excision
  • Burn injury requiring temporary grafting with human cadaver allograft skin, based on clinical judgment prior to definitive wound closure via autologous grafting
  • Sufficient area of burn wound for Xeno-Skin® placement and not located on face or hands or having an engraftment site centered on high-impact areas such as joints, weight-bearing areas (e.g. soles of feet), or the inguinal region, per Investigator's judgment

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Documented history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or other condition(s) that in the opinion of the Investigator may compromise patient safety or study objectives
  • Immunosuppressive medication regimens e.g. antineoplastics, high dose steroids (\> 10 mg prednisone/day), TNF alpha inhibitors, calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine, tacrolimus), anti-proliferative agents, and other immunomodulators
  • Known allergy to penicillins (such as ampicillin), ceftazidime or aztreonam, glycopeptide antibiotics (such as vancomycin) or amphotericin B
  • Active malignancy, including those requiring surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation in the past 5 years. Non-metastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and cervical carcinoma in situ are allowed
  • Use of any experimental or investigational drugs within 30 days prior to placement of Xeno-Skin®
  • Previously received a porcine or other xenogeneic tissue product, including but not limited to: glutaraldehyde fixed porcine or bovine bioprosthetic heart valve replacements and glutaraldehyde fixed porcine dermal matrix (e.g., EZ Derm)
  • BMI \> 40 kg/m2
  • HbA1c ≥ 7.0%
  • Treatment with systemic corticosteroids within 30 days before screening (not including inhaled steroids)
  • Electrical, chemical, or radiation burns
  • History of chronic end stage renal disease defined as an MDRD CrCl \< 15 mL/min, or receiving chronic dialysis
  • History of chronic liver disease or cirrhosis (Child-Pugh Score C). Evidence of acute or chronic hepatitis B infection based on documented HBV serology testing
  • Known documented history of Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, Treponema pallidum, Cytomegalovirus, herpes or varicella zoster Note: Successfully treated hepatitis C patients without evidence of end stage liver disease is allowed. If HCV antibody reactive, then HCV RNA must be undetectable.
  • Recent (within 3 months prior to study enrollment) MI, unstable angina leading to hospitalization, uncontrolled, CABG, PCI, carotid surgery or stenting, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack (TIA), endovascular procedure or surgical intervention for peripheral vascular disease or plans to undergo a major surgical or interventional procedure (eg, PCI, CABG, carotid or peripheral revascularization)
  • +10 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

JMS Burn Center at Doctors Hospital

Augusta, Georgia, 30909, United States

Location

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Related Publications (34)

  • Albritton A, Leonard DA, Leto Barone A, Keegan J, Mallard C, Sachs DH, Kurtz JM, Cetrulo CL Jr. Lack of cross-sensitization between alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout porcine and allogeneic skin grafts permits serial grafting. Transplantation. 2014 Jun 27;97(12):1209-15. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000093.

    PMID: 24798308BACKGROUND
  • Bruccoleri RE, Matthew MK, Schulz JT. Methods in obtaining split-thickness skin grafts from skin reduction surgery specimens. Springerplus. 2016 May 25;5(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2330-2. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27350924BACKGROUND
  • Burd A, Chiu T. Allogenic skin in the treatment of burns. Clin Dermatol. 2005 Jul-Aug;23(4):376-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.07.019.

    PMID: 16023933BACKGROUND
  • Denner J. Paving the Path toward Porcine Organs for Transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1891-1893. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcibr1710853. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29117497BACKGROUND
  • Deschamps JY, Roux FA, Sai P, Gouin E. History of xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2005 Mar;12(2):91-109. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2004.00199.x.

    PMID: 15693840BACKGROUND
  • Ericsson TA, Takeuchi Y, Templin C, Quinn G, Farhadian SF, Wood JC, Oldmixon BA, Suling KM, Ishii JK, Kitagawa Y, Miyazawa T, Salomon DR, Weiss RA, Patience C. Identification of receptors for pig endogenous retrovirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 27;100(11):6759-64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1138025100. Epub 2003 May 9.

    PMID: 12740431BACKGROUND
  • Fishman JA. Screening of source animals and clinical monitoring for xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2007, 349-352.

    BACKGROUND
  • Fishman JA, Scobie L, Takeuchi Y. Xenotransplantation-associated infectious risk: a WHO consultation. Xenotransplantation. 2012 Mar-Apr;19(2):72-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2012.00693.x.

    PMID: 22497509BACKGROUND
  • Godehardt AW, Rodrigues Costa M, Tonjes RR. Review on porcine endogenous retrovirus detection assays--impact on quality and safety of xenotransplants. Xenotransplantation. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(2):95-101. doi: 10.1111/xen.12154. Epub 2015 Jan 31.

    PMID: 25641488BACKGROUND
  • Herndon DN. Total Burn Care, Expert Consult - Online. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.

    BACKGROUND
  • Johnson RM, Richard R. Partial-thickness burns: identification and management. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003 Jul-Aug;16(4):178-87; quiz 188-9. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200307000-00010.

    PMID: 12897674BACKGROUND
  • Kitala D, Kawecki M, Klama-Baryla A, Labus W, Kraut M, Glik J, Ryszkiel I, Kawecki MP, Nowak M. Allogeneic vs. Autologous Skin Grafts in the Therapy of Patients with Burn Injuries: A Restrospective, Open-label Clinical Study with Pair Matching. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;25(5):923-929. doi: 10.17219/acem/61961.

    PMID: 28028957BACKGROUND
  • Leonard DA, Mallard C, Albritton A, Torabi R, Mastroianni M, Sachs DH, Kurtz JM, Cetrulo CL Jr. Skin grafts from genetically modified alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout miniature swine: A functional equivalent to allografts. Burns. 2017 Dec;43(8):1717-1724. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.04.026. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

    PMID: 28602591BACKGROUND
  • Leto Barone AA, Mastroianni M, Farkash EA, Mallard C, Albritton A, Torabi R, Leonard DA, Kurtz JM, Sachs DH, Cetrulo CL Jr. Genetically modified porcine split-thickness skin grafts as an alternative to allograft for provision of temporary wound coverage: preliminary characterization. Burns. 2015 May;41(3):565-74. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

    PMID: 25406888BACKGROUND
  • Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. (n.d.). Retrieved May 01, 2017, from https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/

    BACKGROUND
  • Martin SI, Wilkinson R, Fishman JA. Genomic presence of recombinant porcine endogenous retrovirus in transmitting miniature swine. Virol J. 2006 Nov 2;3:91. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-3-91.

    PMID: 17081300BACKGROUND
  • Meije Y, Tonjes RR, Fishman JA. Retroviral restriction factors and infectious risk in xenotransplantation. Am J Transplant. 2010 Jul;10(7):1511-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03146.x.

    PMID: 20642677BACKGROUND
  • Morozov VA, Wynyard S, Matsumoto S, Abalovich A, Denner J, Elliott R. No PERV transmission during a clinical trial of pig islet cell transplantation. Virus Res. 2017 Jan 2;227:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Sep 24.

    PMID: 27677465BACKGROUND
  • Paradis K, Langford G, Long Z, Heneine W, Sandstrom P, Switzer WM, Chapman LE, Lockey C, Onions D, Otto E. Search for cross-species transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus in patients treated with living pig tissue. The XEN 111 Study Group. Science. 1999 Aug 20;285(5431):1236-41. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5431.1236.

    PMID: 10455044BACKGROUND
  • Patience C, Takeuchi Y, Weiss RA. Infection of human cells by an endogenous retrovirus of pigs. Nat Med. 1997 Mar;3(3):282-6. doi: 10.1038/nm0397-282.

    PMID: 9055854BACKGROUND
  • Sachs DH. The lure of transplantation. Clin Transpl. 2008:287-305. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19708462BACKGROUND
  • Schaffer A. Cadaver Skin Fills the Gap in Burn Cases. New York Times. May 2, 2006.

    BACKGROUND
  • Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, Kirsner R, Lambert L, Hunt TK, Gottrup F, Gurtner GC, Longaker MT. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Nov-Dec;17(6):763-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x.

    PMID: 19903300BACKGROUND
  • Sheridan RL, Tompkins RG. Skin substitutes in burns. Burns. 1999 Mar;25(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(98)00176-4. No abstract available.

    PMID: 10208382BACKGROUND
  • Shi M, Wang X, Okamoto M, Takao S, Baba M. Inhibition of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) replication by HIV-1 gene expression inhibitors. Antiviral Res. 2009 Aug;83(2):201-4. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.04.011. Epub 2009 May 3.

    PMID: 19414036BACKGROUND
  • Thorton JF and Gosman AA. Skin Grafts and Skin Substitutes. Baylor University Medical Center. 2004 10(1): 2-78

    BACKGROUND
  • Weiner J, Yamada K, Ishikawa Y, Moran S, Etter J, Shimizu A, Smith RN, Sachs DH. Prolonged survival of GalT-KO swine skin on baboons. Xenotransplantation. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):147-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2010.00576.x.

    PMID: 20522247BACKGROUND
  • Wilhelm M, Fishman JA, Pontikis R, Aubertin AM, Wilhelm FX. Susceptibility of recombinant porcine endogenous retrovirus reverse transcriptase to nucleoside and non-nucleoside inhibitors. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002 Dec;59(12):2184-90. doi: 10.1007/s000180200017.

    PMID: 12568344BACKGROUND
  • Wood JC, Quinn G, Suling KM, Oldmixon BA, Van Tine BA, Cina R, Arn S, Huang CA, Scobie L, Onions DE, Sachs DH, Schuurman HJ, Fishman JA, Patience C. Identification of exogenous forms of human-tropic porcine endogenous retrovirus in miniature Swine. J Virol. 2004 Mar;78(5):2494-501. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.5.2494-2501.2004.

    PMID: 14963150BACKGROUND
  • World Health Organization Burn Fact Sheet. http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/burns. March 6, 2018.

    BACKGROUND
  • Wynyard S, Nathu D, Garkavenko O, Denner J, Elliott R. Microbiological safety of the first clinical pig islet xenotransplantation trial in New Zealand. Xenotransplantation. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):309-23. doi: 10.1111/xen.12102. Epub 2014 May 7.

    PMID: 24801820BACKGROUND
  • Yue S, Zhang Y, Gao Y. A study on the susceptibility of allogeneic human hepatocytes to porcine endogenous retrovirus. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Sep;19(18):3486-91.

    PMID: 26439047BACKGROUND
  • Holzer PW, Leonard DA, Shanmugarajah K, Moulton KN, Ng ZY, Cetrulo CL Jr, Sachs DH. A Comparative Examination of the Clinical Outcome and Histological Appearance of Cryopreserved and Fresh Split-Thickness Skin Grafts. J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e55-e61. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000431.

    PMID: 27606556BACKGROUND
  • Wu D, Zhao XS, Zhao HF, Xie JH, Wei HJ, Zhu NW. New Hope for the Treatment of Severe Skin Injury: Genetically Engineered Porcine Skin Xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2025 May-Jun;32(3):e70057. doi: 10.1111/xen.70057.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Burns

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Jeremy Goverman, MD

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a Phase 1/2, Open-label, Multi-center, Clinical Trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of realSKIN® to provide complete wound closure of severe and extensive deep-partial or full-thickness burn wounds. Approximately 25 total subjects will be enrolled. The designated realSKIN® product size will be placed on the burn wound following wound site preparation, including necessary debridement and tangential excision as determined by burn surgeon and secured in place via suturing or stapling. The remaining burn wound will be covered with human cadaver allograft and treated according to local standard of care with care to avoid any overlap or significant contact of the two temporary wound dressings. The Investigator will assess the wounds and identify the matched pair of burn sites then the treatments will be randomly assigned to the sites.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2018

First Posted

October 4, 2018

Study Start

March 15, 2019

Primary Completion

December 30, 2023

Study Completion

December 30, 2023

Last Updated

January 12, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations