Clinical Study of the Efficacy of the Ophthalmic Emulsion PRO-145 for Inflammation and Pain After Phacoemulsification
PRO-145/III
1 other identifier
interventional
178
1 country
5
Brief Summary
objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the ophthalmic emulsion PRO-145 in the treatment of inflammation and pain after phacoemulsification. Hypothesis: The use of the ophthalmic emulsion PRO-145 is effective in decreasing the inflammatory response evaluated by means of cellularity in the anterior chamber, after phacoemulsification. Methodology: Phase III clinical trial, double-blind, controlled, parallel group, multicentre, randomized. Number of patients: 178 subjects divided into 2 groups (89 subjects per group), who will provide an eye for the evaluation of efficacy. Diagnosis and main inclusion criteria: Diagnosis: Postoperative phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens placement in a bag.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Oct 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 4, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 7, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 22, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 2, 2019
CompletedDecember 2, 2019
November 1, 2019
10 months
October 1, 2018
November 8, 2019
November 8, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Visual Ability (VA)
The VA will be evaluated basally, without refractive correction with the Snellen chart. Which will be located in a place with adequate lighting, natural or artificial and at a distance of 3 meters from the subject to be evaluated. The result of the Snellen fraction will be transformed to its decimal equivalent in LogMAR, ex. 20/20= 1.0, 20/25=0.8, 20/40= 0.5, 20/200= 1.0, etc. The subjects will be averaged by group.
day 28 at the final visit
Adverse Events
The evaluation of adverse events requires a questioning conducted by the principal investigator and the appropriate exploratory techniques for its detection. the number of cases with adverse events will be reported per study arm
day 28 at the final visit
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Cellularity in the Anterior Chamber
day 28 at the final visit
Clinical Corneal Edema
day 28 at the final visit
Flare
day 28 at the final visit
Central Thickness of the Retina
day 28 at the final visit
Conjunctival Hyperemia
day 28 at the final visit
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
PRO-145.
EXPERIMENTALDifluprednate 0.05%. Prepared by Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V., Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.
Prednefrin
ACTIVE COMPARATORPrednefrin® SF. Prednisolone Acetate 1%. Prepared by Allergan, S.A. of C.V.
Interventions
Dosage: 1 drop 4 times a day (every 4 hours) during the period of vigil in the operated eye, for 14 days. Dose reduction for 14 days at the discretion of the principal investigator.
1 drop 4 times a day (every 4 hours) during the period of vigil in the operated eye, for 14 days. Dose reduction for 14 days at the discretion of the principal investigator. \- Route of administration: topical ophthalmic
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Both sexes.
- Postoperative cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. o That they have met the criteria for phacoemulsification and a classification of the lens opacity classification system (LOCS) III cataract of Opalescence of the nucleus (NO) ≥2 and Kernel color (NC) ≥2.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women, lactating or planning to get pregnant.
- Women of reproductive age and who do not have a hormonal contraceptive method, intrauterine device or bilateral tubal obstruction.
- Participation in another clinical research study ≤ 30 days before the baseline visit.
- Have previously participated in this same study with the contralateral eye.
- That they can not comply with their attendance at appointments or with all the requirements of the protocol.
- Medical and therapeutic criteria.
- Surgery in both eyes in the same surgical shift.
- Time\> 24 hours after having surgery.
- Intraocular lens placement outside the bag.
- Presentation of rupture of the posterior capsule, with or without the presence of vitreous.
- Carrying out an iridectomy, or lesion of the pupillary sphincter during phacoemulsification surgery.
- Scheduled for surgical intervention in the contralateral eye during the study period.
- History of glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
- History of increased Intraocular pressure (IOP) with the use of steroids.
- Intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥24.
- +17 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Catarata y Glaucoma de Occidente
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44160, Mexico
Novam y Vita
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44620, Mexico
Vision Cirugia Ambulatoria
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64710, Mexico
Hospital de la luz
Mexico City, 06030, Mexico
Fundación de asistencia privada Conde de Valenciana
Mexico City, 06800, Mexico
Related Publications (1)
Palacio-Pastrana C, Chavez-Mondragon E, Soto-Gomez A, Suarez-Velasco R, Montes-Salcedo M, Fernandez de Ortega L, Nasser-Nasser L, Baiza-Duran L, Olvera-Montano O, Munoz-Villegas P. Difluprednate 0.05% versus Prednisolone Acetate Post-Phacoemulsification for Inflammation and Pain: An Efficacy and Safety Clinical Trial. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 12;14:1581-1589. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S254705. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32606573DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Ricardo Llamas (clinical safety pharmacologist)
- Organization
- Laboratorios Sophia
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Leopoldo Baiza Durán, MD
Laboratorios Sophia S.A de C.V.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Blinding and masking The blinding will correspond to the research subject and the principal investigator. In addition, the statistical analysis will be carried out in a blinded manner in the case of a partial and final analysis. The masking will be carried out using boxes in the identical primary packaging in the two groups and re-labeling the bottles of both interventions. Blinding for the research subject and the researcher will be done by replacing the commercial labels in the case of the comparator in the bottles and the use of identical labels that contain the assignment number.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2018
First Posted
October 3, 2018
Study Start
October 4, 2018
Primary Completion
August 7, 2019
Study Completion
October 22, 2019
Last Updated
December 2, 2019
Results First Posted
December 2, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11