Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
A study that compares between Open TLIF and Minimally invasive TLIF regarding patients' functional status(Oswestry Disability index)as a primary outcome measure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2021
CompletedOctober 2, 2018
September 1, 2018
2 years
September 28, 2018
October 1, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oswestry Disability index(Arabic version) 1 month
an index derived from the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire used by clinicians and researchers to quantify disability for low back pain.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
• Fusion rate as assessed by Bridwell fusion score.
1 year
Study Arms (2)
O-TLIF group
OTHERSpinal fusion ,Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure will be performed through open surgery.
MI-TLIF group
OTHERSpinal fusion,Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure will be performed through minimally invasive surgery using a tubular retractor.
Interventions
Spinal fusion procedure through the intervertebral foramen
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults more than 18 years of age and less than 65 years of age..
- Degenerative or isthmic spondylolithesis Grade 1,2 and 3.
- Recurrent Symptomatic recurrent lumbar disc prolapsed with or without evident neural compression.
- Single level pathology involving L2-3, L3-4, L4-5 and or L5-S1.
- Symptoms not responding to conservative treatment for at least 3 months.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous spinal fusion or instrumentation.
- Spinal tumours, infection and fractures.
- Patients with severe osteoporosis
- BMI more than 35.
- Non-ambulant patients and patients with severe preoperative neurological affection (Cauda Equina Syndrome)
- Patients not willing to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2018
First Posted
October 2, 2018
Study Start
November 1, 2018
Primary Completion
November 1, 2020
Study Completion
October 1, 2021
Last Updated
October 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share