NCT03691987

Brief Summary

This is a single-center stratified (on gender and donor), block randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial with 12-months follow-up of 80 chronic fatigue syndrome/encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) participants. Participants will be randomized to treatment by preprocessed thawed donor fecal microbiota transplant or preprocessed thawed autologous fecal microbiota transplant. Primary endpoint is the efficacy of FMT at three months by the Fatigue Severity Scale. The investigators will use patient reported outcomes for primary and secondary outcome measures. Previous studies suggest that a dysbiosis of the gut microbiota may be a key feature in CFS/ME. We hypothesize that A: CFS/ME is caused by a dysbiosis in the gut flora causing barrier leakage of bacterial products, a low grade systemic immune activation and disturbances in the host energy metabolism. B: Recovery of a normal gut flora by fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) alleviates symptoms and may even induce remission of CFS/ME. This project aims to determine if there is a true cause and effect relationship between a dysbiotic gut flora and CFS/ME by testing if treatment of the observed dysbiosis by FMT also can resolve CFS/ME symptoms. In this process, collection of blood, fecal, and urine samples before and after FMT will open the possibility to explore the relationship between the gut flora, immune response, host energy metabolism and CFS/ME using technologies of microbiomics, metabolomics and immunological characterizations for a better understanding of the pathobiology of CFS/ME.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2019

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 10, 2018

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 2, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 15, 2019

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2023

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 23, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

September 10, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 22, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

fecal transplantationbacterio therapyfatiguefecal microbiota transplantation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion with treatment success in FSS score in donor versus placebo FMT group. Treatment success is defined as an improvement of more than 1.2 points on the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a self-reported, 9-item fatigue scale. Participants rate all 9 items on a 7-point Likert scale (1-2-3-4-5-6-7) depending on how appropriate they felt the statement applied to them over the preceding week. The total score is calculated by adding up the answer from each item and divide by 9. Lower scores indicate better outcomes. Maximum score is 7. In an intention to treat analysis we will categorize participants as responders/non-responders, defining responders as decrease of more than 1,2 to the total baseline score in the FSS at 3 months post FMT by Chi Square. Baseline score will be the average of the two scores from the screening period. Missing values will be regarded as non responders

    Three months after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Change in donor versus placebo FMT group in fatigue by the Fatigue Severity Scale score

    Change in Fatigue severity scale by repeated measures from baseline and until 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment

  • Change in donor versus placebo FMT group in quality of life by the SF36 score

    Change in SF36 score by repeated measures from baseline and until 3 and 12 months after treamtent

  • Change in donor versus placebo FMT group in neurocognitive function by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) score from baseline and until 3 months after treatment.

    Change from baseline and until three months after treatment

  • Change in donor versus placebo FMT group in anxiety and depression by the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) score

    Change in HADS score by repeated measures from baseline and until 3 and 12 months after treatment

  • Change in donor versus placebo FMT group in gastrointestinal related complaints by the sum score of selected items in the DePaul Questionnaire (DPQ) (29, 30, 46 and 47)

    Change in DPQ score by repeated measures from baseline and until 6 and 12 months after treatment

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (10)

  • Engraftment of donor microbiota

    3 months after FMT

  • Engraftment of donor microbiota

    12 months after FMT

  • Difference in metagenomic profile between responders and non responder to FMT

    Baseline samples before FMT

  • +7 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Preprocessed thawed donor FMT

EXPERIMENTAL

The active transplants are processed in a 2-3 weeks period before treatment of the first participant. Fifty to eighty grams of freshly delivered feces from donors is mixed with 100 mL isotonic saline and 25 mL 85% glycerol, homogenized and poured through a 0.5 mm mesh steel strainer, and transferred to 60 ml luerlock syringes and stored at -40°C. Frozen transplants are slowly thawed 2 hours prior to administration by transferring the FMT-syringes to a waterbath (+30°C). The transplant is then mixed with 125 mL 12°C isotonic saline in an enema bag prior to installation.

Biological: Preprocessed thawed donor FMT

Preprocessed thawed autologous FMT

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The placebo transplant from each participant is prepared during the inclusion process four to six weeks before intervention and stored at -40°C. Fifty to eighty grams of freshly delivered feces from participants is mixed with 100 mL isotonic saline and 25 mL 85% glycerol is homogenized and poured through a 0.5 mm mesh steel strainer, and transferred to 60ml Luerlock syringes. Frozen transplants are slowly thawed 2 hours prior to administration by transferring the Luerlock syringes to a waterbath (+30°C). The transplant is then mixed with 125 mL 12°C isotonic saline in the enema bag prior to installation.

Biological: Preprocessed thawed autologous FMT

Interventions

Delivered as an enema using the same equipment and technique as X-ray of the colon

Preprocessed thawed donor FMT

Delivered as an enema using the same equipment and technique as X-ray of the colon

Preprocessed thawed autologous FMT

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • International Consensus Criteria for CFS/ME
  • years
  • Mild-severe CFS/ME
  • Fatigue Severity Scale score of 5,0-7,0
  • Symptom duration for 2-15 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Kidney failure
  • Congestive heart failure
  • Immuno-deficiency or use of immune-suppresive drugs
  • Other disease that may explain ME/CFS symptoms discovered during diagnostic work up
  • Use of antibiotics the last three months,
  • Use of low dose naltrexone or Isoprinosin
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Serious endogenous depression
  • Chronic infectious disease (HIV, hepatitis B or C etc.)
  • Introduction of new food supplements, change in diet or introduction of new medications the last three months
  • Assessed not be able to follow the instructions for data and sample collection
  • Very severe ME/CFS (WHO class IV)
  • Symptom duration of less than 24 months or more than 15 years
  • History of abdominal surgery, with the exception of appendectomy, cholecystectomy, caesarean section and hysterectomy
  • Previous treatment with FMT
  • +26 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital of North Norway, Harstad

Harstad, Troms, 9406, Norway

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Skjevling L, Goll R, Hanssen HM, Johnsen PH. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in Norwegian outpatients with mild to severe myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): protocol for a 12-month randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 10;14(6):e073275. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073275.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fatigue Syndrome, ChronicFatigue

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesEncephalomyelitisNeuroinflammatory DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Rasmus Goll, MD. PhD.

    University Hospital of North Norway

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2018

First Posted

October 2, 2018

Study Start

February 15, 2019

Primary Completion

March 1, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

February 23, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Available when findings from primary and secondary endpoints are published. Study protocol will be available upon request when we initiate the inclusion.
Access Criteria
Data access requests will be reviewed by study investigators. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement

Locations