Erector Spinae Block Versus Shoulder Periarticular Anesthetic Infiltration for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Randomized Control Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Block Versus Shoulder Periarticular Anesthetic Infiltration for Pain Control After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Arthroscopic shoulder surgery is a common and minimally invasive procedure utilized for different shoulder pathologies, but it is often associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain that may interfere with patients' well-being and course of recovery. By using an effective analgesic technique with few side effects, a patient may experience less pain after surgery, have a shortened hospital stay, and endure less nausea, vomiting, or excessive drowsiness that are associated with the use of opioids to manage postoperative pain. Periarticular infiltration (PAI) with local anesthetic (LA) has been used for shoulder surgery pain management, but the more effective interscalene nerve block (ISNB) is the current gold standard analgesic modality despite risk of significant side effects including diaphragm paralysis and rebound pain. In this study, the investigators want to look at the effectiveness and safety profile of a novel technique for pain management after shoulder surgery that has the potential to provide successful pain relief with minimal risk of side effects. Half of the patients will be randomly selected to receive the novel nerve block called the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block while the other half will receive a more standard PAI of local anesthetic to numb the shoulder. Patients' pain intensity and opioid consumption in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) as well as during the first 24 hours after surgery will be evaluated. Any complications from the interventions will also be noted. The investigators predict that the ESP block will provide superior analgesia compared to PAI for these shoulder arthroscopy patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2021
CompletedFebruary 24, 2021
August 1, 2020
7 months
September 18, 2018
February 23, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recovery room resting pain score
Using the patient-reported numeric rating scale (0-10) (0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable).
At 30 minutes post-admission to recovery room
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Day Surgery Unit resting pain score
At 5 hours post-operatively
Pain scores with movement
At 30 minutes post-admission to recovery room and 5 hours post-operatively
Opioid usage
At 2 hours post-operatively and 5 hours post-operatively
Incidence of moderate to severe postoperative nausea-vomiting
At 2 hours post-operatively and 5 hours post-operatively
Incidence of moderate to severe itching
At 2 hours post-operatively and 5 hours post-operatively
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ESP Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPreoperative US guided active Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block and a saline PAI
PAI with LA
OTHERPreoperative US guided ESP blockade with saline and an active Periarticular Infiltration (PAI)
Interventions
1. Preoperative US guided ESP blockade using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 5 mcg/mL of epinephrine, injected in 5-mL aliquots through the needle (maximum of 3 mg/kg) 2. PAI of 30 mL of saline at the end of the surgical procedure on the operated side rotator cuff, injected in 5-mL aliquots through the needle
1. Preoperative US guided ESP blockade using 30 mL of saline, injected in 5-mL aliquots through the needle 2. PAI of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 5 mcg/mL of epinephrine at the end of the surgical procedure on the operated side rotator cuff, injected in 5-mL aliquots through the needle
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- elective arthroscopic shoulder joint surgeries admitted for day surgical procedure
- an ability to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- not willing
- contraindications to spinal injections as per the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain (ASRA) guidelines
- known allergy to LA
- allergy to all opioid medications
- diagnostic shoulder arthroscopic procedures
- inability to understand or comprehend in English language
- history of daily opioid medication use for the last one month
- patients with planned overnight hospital stay
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada
Related Publications (20)
Fontana C, Di Donato A, Di Giacomo G, Costantini A, De Vita A, Lancia F, Caricati A. Postoperative analgesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study of intraarticular, subacromial injection, interscalenic brachial plexus block and intraarticular plus subacromial injection efficacy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Aug;26(8):689-93. doi: 10.1097/eja.0b013e32832d673e.
PMID: 19593887BACKGROUNDManchikanti L, Fellows B, Ailinani H, Pampati V. Therapeutic use, abuse, and nonmedical use of opioids: a ten-year perspective. Pain Physician. 2010 Sep-Oct;13(5):401-35.
PMID: 20859312BACKGROUNDChung F, Ritchie E, Su J. Postoperative pain in ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997 Oct;85(4):808-16. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199710000-00017.
PMID: 9322460BACKGROUNDBarber FA, Herbert MA. The effectiveness of an anesthetic continuous-infusion device on postoperative pain control. Arthroscopy. 2002 Jan;18(1):76-81. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.25976.
PMID: 11774146BACKGROUNDMerivirta R, Kuusniemi KS, Aantaa R, Hurme SA, Aarimaa V, Leino KA. The analgesic effect of continuous subacromial bupivacaine infusion after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Feb;56(2):210-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02606.x.
PMID: 22236345BACKGROUNDHarvey GP, Chelly JE, AlSamsam T, Coupe K. Patient-controlled ropivacaine analgesia after arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Arthroscopy. 2004 May;20(5):451-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.03.004.
PMID: 15122133BACKGROUNDWarrender WJ, Syed UAM, Hammoud S, Emper W, Ciccotti MG, Abboud JA, Freedman KB. Pain Management After Outpatient Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;45(7):1676-1686. doi: 10.1177/0363546516667906. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
PMID: 27729319BACKGROUNDUquillas CA, Capogna BM, Rossy WH, Mahure SA, Rokito AS. Postoperative pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jul;25(7):1204-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.026. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
PMID: 27079219BACKGROUNDShin SW, Byeon GJ, Yoon JU, Ok YM, Baek SH, Kim KH, Lee SJ. Effective analgesia with ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Anesth. 2014 Feb;28(1):64-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1681-x. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
PMID: 23903900BACKGROUNDMisamore G, Webb B, McMurray S, Sallay P. A prospective analysis of interscalene brachial plexus blocks performed under general anesthesia. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.043. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
PMID: 20708419BACKGROUNDWebb BG, Sallay PI, McMurray SD, Misamore GW. Comparison of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Performed With and Without Steroids. Orthopedics. 2016 Nov 1;39(6):e1100-e1103. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160819-02. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
PMID: 27575034BACKGROUNDCandido KD, Sukhani R, Doty R Jr, Nader A, Kendall MC, Yaghmour E, Kataria TC, McCarthy R. Neurologic sequelae after interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder/upper arm surgery: the association of patient, anesthetic, and surgical factors to the incidence and clinical course. Anesth Analg. 2005 May;100(5):1489-1495. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000148696.11814.9F.
PMID: 15845712BACKGROUNDNam YS, Jeong JJ, Han SH, Park SE, Lee SM, Kwon MJ, Ji JH, Kim KS. An anatomic and clinical study of the suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks for shoulder arthroscopy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Oct;20(7):1061-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.022. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
PMID: 21839653BACKGROUNDCostache I, de Neumann L, Ramnanan CJ, Goodwin SL, Pawa A, Abdallah FW, McCartney CJL. The mid-point transverse process to pleura (MTP) block: a new end-point for thoracic paravertebral block. Anaesthesia. 2017 Oct;72(10):1230-1236. doi: 10.1111/anae.14004. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
PMID: 28762464BACKGROUNDForero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PMID: 27501016BACKGROUNDHamilton DL, Manickam B. The Erector Spinae Plane Block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):276. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000565. No abstract available.
PMID: 28207652BACKGROUNDForero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary SD, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane block for the management of chronic shoulder pain: a case report. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Mar;65(3):288-293. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-1010-1. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
PMID: 29134518BACKGROUNDTran DQ, Elgueta MF, Aliste J, Finlayson RJ. Diaphragm-Sparing Nerve Blocks for Shoulder Surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):32-38. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000529.
PMID: 27941477BACKGROUNDAbdallah FW, Halpern SH, Aoyama K, Brull R. Will the Real Benefits of Single-Shot Interscalene Block Please Stand Up? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anesth Analg. 2015 May;120(5):1114-1129. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000688.
PMID: 25822923BACKGROUNDCzuczman M, Shanthanna H, Alolabi B, Moisiuk P, O'Hare T, Khan M, Forero M, Davis K, Moro J, Vanniyasingam T, Thabane L. Randomized control trial of ultrasound-guided erector spinae block versus shoulder periarticular anesthetic infiltration for pain control after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: Study protocol clinical trial (SPIRIT compliant). Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(15):e19721. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019721.
PMID: 32282729DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harsha Shanthanna, MD
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton/McMaster University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bashar Alolabi, MD
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Czuczman, MD
McMaster University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2018
First Posted
October 2, 2018
Study Start
July 6, 2019
Primary Completion
February 1, 2020
Study Completion
February 1, 2021
Last Updated
February 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-08