Fascia Iliaca Blocks for Total Hip Arthroplasty
Fascia Iliaca Block for Analgesia in Unilateral Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The development of minimal-incision techniques for total hip arthroplasty (THA) with preservation of soft tissue is generally associated with reduction of postoperative pain and increased patient comfort. Although this technique requires a smaller incision than other approaches used for hip surgery, adequate postoperative pain management remains crucial for enhanced recovery and early rehabilitation. The fascia iliaca block (FIB) is commonly used to enhance analgesia after hip replacement surgery, however the effect of FIB volume on analgesia quality and sensory-motor blockade have not been adequately studied. In this study, total postsurgical opioid consumption (morphine equivalents IV in hospital and oral at home) through the first postoperative week will be compared and extent and duration of sensory motor block through the 2-day inpatient stay will be evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started May 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 4, 2019
CompletedSeptember 10, 2020
September 1, 2020
1.5 years
August 1, 2018
September 9, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with movement
Day 0
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
PACU arrival
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
PACU discharge
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
6 hours
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
12 hours
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
24 hours
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
36 hours
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
48 hours
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
Day 2 evening
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
Day 3 morning
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
Day 3 evening
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
Day 4
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
Day 5
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
Day 6
Current pain assessed by numeric rating scale (NRS)
Pain rating (Numeric Rating Scale: 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) at rest and with
Day 7
Secondary Outcomes (22)
Total opioid consumption
PACU arrival
Total opioid consumption
PACU discharge
Total opioid consumption
6 hours
Total opioid consumption
12 hours
Total opioid consumption
24 hours
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Low dosis bupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPreoperative fascia iliaca block with Marcaine 0.25% (0.11 mL x subject height)
High dosis bupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPreoperative fascia iliaca block with Marcaine 0.25% (0.22 mL x subject height)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPreoperative fascia iliaca block with Sodium Chloride 0.9% (0.11 mL x subject height)
Interventions
Fascia iliaca block with volume 0.11 mL x subject height
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female, at least 18 years of age at screening
- Scheduled for unilateral DAA THA
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1, 2 or 3
- Able to demonstrate sensory function by exhibiting sensitivity to light touch, pinprick and cold
- Able to ambulate
- Able to provide informed consent, adhere to the study visit schedule, and complete all study assessments
You may not qualify if:
- Previous open hip surgery
- History of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to amide-type local anesthetics
- Contraindication to bupivacaine or morphine
- Concurrent physical condition that may require analgesic treatment (such as NSAID or opioid) in the postsurgical period for pain that is not strictly related to the hip surgery and which may confound the postsurgical assessments
- Initiation of treatment with any of the following medications within 1 month of study drug administration or if the medication(s) are being given to control pain: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), gabapentin, pregabalin (Lyrica®), or duloxetine (Cymbalta®)
- Body weight \<40 kg (88 pounds) or a body mass index \>44 kg/m2
- Uncontrolled anxiety, psychiatric, or neurological disorder that might interfere with study assessments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Genk, Limburg, B-3600, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2018
First Posted
October 1, 2018
Study Start
May 15, 2018
Primary Completion
November 12, 2019
Study Completion
December 4, 2019
Last Updated
September 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09