rTMS Treatment of Persistent Headache and Post Concussion Symptoms Attributed to Mild Traumatic Injury to the Head
TOPiCS-rTMS
Treatment of Persistent Headache Attributed to Mild Traumatic Injury to the Head (PHATIH) in Patients With Persistent Post Concussion Symptoms (PPCS) Using Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to investigate the treatment effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with a history of both persistent post-traumatic headache and post-concussion symptoms. In this double-blind, sham-controlled, concealed allocation, randomized clinical trial, 20 patients aged 18-65 yrs will be recruited from the Calgary Brain Injury Program (CBIP) and the Calgary Headache Assessment and Management Program (CHAMP) / Calgary Chronic Pain Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Patients will engage in a two-week rTMS treatment protocol (10 treatments) and will be followed for 6 months after therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Apr 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2019
CompletedApril 22, 2019
September 1, 2018
1.5 years
September 26, 2018
April 18, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in headache severity from baseline to 1 month post-treatment.
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS): a tool to assess severity of pain, which is graded from 0-10 (11 points) with 0 defined as "no pain" and 10 as "worst possible pain".
Repeated measures: Baseline (0-2 weeks),1 month (6-8 weeks)
Change in headache frequency from baseline to 1 month post-treatment.
Number of headaches/2 weeks
Repeated measures: Baseline (0-2 weeks),1 month (6-8 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Headache severity
Repeated measures: Pre-treatment (0-2 weeks), During Treatment (2-4 weeks), Post-treatment (4-6 weeks), 1 Month (6-8 weeks), 3 Months (10-12 weeks), 6 Months (22-24 weeks)
Headache frequency
Repeated measures: Pre-treatment (0-2 weeks), During Treatment (2-4 weeks), Post-treatment (4-6 weeks), 1 Month (6-8 weeks), 3 Months (10-12 weeks), 6 Months (22-24 weeks)
Function
Repeated measures: Pre-treatment (0-2 weeks), During Treatment (2-4 weeks), Post-treatment (4-6 weeks), 1 Month (6-8 weeks), 3 Months (10-12 weeks), 6 Months (22-24 weeks)
Depression
Repeated measures: Pre-treatment (0-2 weeks), During Treatment (2-4 weeks), Post-treatment (4-6 weeks), 1 Month (6-8 weeks), 3 Months (10-12 weeks), 6 Months (22-24 weeks)
Anxiety
Repeated measures: Pre-treatment (0-2 weeks), During Treatment (2-4 weeks), Post-treatment (4-6 weeks), 1 Month (6-8 weeks), 3 Months (10-12 weeks), 6 Months (22-24 weeks)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
rTMS- Real Air Film Coil
EXPERIMENTALPatient MR brain scans will be loaded and processed using the Brainsight TMS neuronavigation software and stereotaxic data for localization of the TMS stimulation site will be determined through a co-registration method between the TMS coil position and the projected site on the MR brain scan. The DLPFC will be located through MNI coordinates (-48, 20, 34). Electromyography (EMG) electrodes will be attached to the right abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle. The resting motor threshold (RMT) is determined as the minimal stimulation intensity required to elicit motor-evoked response of 50 microvolts peak-to-peak amplitude in at least 5 out of 10 consecutive trials of the ADM (contralateral to stimulation).
rTMS- Sham coil
SHAM COMPARATORThe same procedure for determining RMT as described above will be employed for the Sham Arm. However, a sham coil will be used when the treatment over the left DLPFC is applied.
Interventions
70% resting motor threshold amplitude; Frequency 10 Hz; 10 trains of 60 pulses/train (total of 600 pulses); Inter-train interval 45s.
A sham coil will be applied to the scalp after the resting motor threshold is determined. Patients will be able to hear the sound and feel the vibration of sham coil, but will not experience any effective stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of a persistent headache attributed to traumatic injury to the head based on the ICHD-3 criteria
- Diagnosis of persistent post-concussion symptoms based on the ICD-10 criteria
- mTBI occurrence from 3 months to 5 years from study start date
You may not qualify if:
- Prior history of TMS therapy
- TMS-related contraindications (pacemaker, metallic implant)
- History of chronic headache (\>15 days/month for 3 months) or migraine prior to most recent trauma
- Other medical conditions such as: structural brain disease, previous seizure, psychotic disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder), liver or kidney disease, malignancy, uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes, and pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6, Canada
Related Publications (24)
Misra UK, Kalita J, Bhoi SK. High-rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Neurol. 2013 Nov;260(11):2793-801. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7072-2. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
PMID: 23963471BACKGROUNDIverson GL, Brooks BL, Ashton VL, Lange RT. Interview versus questionnaire symptom reporting in people with the postconcussion syndrome. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):23-30. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181b4b6ab.
PMID: 19680134BACKGROUNDIverson GL, Lange RT. Examination of "postconcussion-like" symptoms in a healthy sample. Appl Neuropsychol. 2003;10(3):137-44. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN1003_02.
PMID: 12890639BACKGROUNDJacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):12-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.1.12.
PMID: 2002127BACKGROUNDEyres S, Carey A, Gilworth G, Neumann V, Tennant A. Construct validity and reliability of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. Clin Rehabil. 2005 Dec;19(8):878-87. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr905oa.
PMID: 16323387BACKGROUNDLannsjo M, Borg J, Bjorklund G, Af Geijerstam JL, Lundgren-Nilsson A. Internal construct validity of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Nov;43(11):997-1002. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0875.
PMID: 22031345BACKGROUNDKing NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NE, Wade DT. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol. 1995 Sep;242(9):587-92. doi: 10.1007/BF00868811.
PMID: 8551320BACKGROUNDAshbaugh AR, Houle-Johnson S, Herbert C, El-Hage W, Brunet A. Psychometric Validation of the English and French Versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). PLoS One. 2016 Oct 10;11(10):e0161645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161645. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27723815BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUNDLowe B, Schenkel I, Carney-Doebbeling C, Gobel C. Responsiveness of the PHQ-9 to Psychopharmacological Depression Treatment. Psychosomatics. 2006 Jan-Feb;47(1):62-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.47.1.62.
PMID: 16384809BACKGROUNDFann JR, Bombardier CH, Dikmen S, Esselman P, Warms CA, Pelzer E, Rau H, Temkin N. Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in assessing depression following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):501-11. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200511000-00003.
PMID: 16304487BACKGROUNDKumar, S., Jawahar, A., Shah, P. & Kumar, M. Montreal Cognitive Assessment, a screening tool for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (P7.185). Neurology 84 (2015).
BACKGROUNDNasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
PMID: 15817019BACKGROUNDKjeldgaard D, Forchhammer H, Teasdale T, Jensen RH. Chronic post-traumatic headache after mild head injury: a descriptive study. Cephalalgia. 2014 Mar;34(3):191-200. doi: 10.1177/0333102413505236. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
PMID: 24045573BACKGROUNDRendas-Baum R, Yang M, Varon SF, Bloudek LM, DeGryse RE, Kosinski M. Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in patients with chronic migraine. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Aug 1;12:117. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0117-0.
PMID: 25080874BACKGROUNDYang M, Rendas-Baum R, Varon SF, Kosinski M. Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) across episodic and chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2011 Feb;31(3):357-67. doi: 10.1177/0333102410379890. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
PMID: 20819842BACKGROUNDKosinski M, Bayliss MS, Bjorner JB, Ware JE Jr, Garber WH, Batenhorst A, Cady R, Dahlof CG, Dowson A, Tepper S. A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec;12(8):963-74. doi: 10.1023/a:1026119331193.
PMID: 14651415BACKGROUNDvon Steinbuchel N, Wilson L, Gibbons H, Hawthorne G, Hofer S, Schmidt S, Bullinger M, Maas A, Neugebauer E, Powell J, von Wild K, Zitnay G, Bakx W, Christensen AL, Koskinen S, Formisano R, Saarajuri J, Sasse N, Truelle JL; QOLIBRI Task Force. Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI): scale validity and correlates of quality of life. J Neurotrauma. 2010 Jul;27(7):1157-65. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1077.
PMID: 20210602BACKGROUNDLee JJ, Lee MK, Kim JE, Kim HZ, Park SH, Tae JH, Choi SS. Pain relief scale is more highly correlated with numerical rating scale than with visual analogue scale in chronic pain patients. Pain Physician. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):E195-200.
PMID: 25794219BACKGROUNDHjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.
PMID: 21621130BACKGROUNDProvost JS, Petrides M, Monchi O. Dissociating the role of the caudate nucleus and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the monitoring of events within human working memory. Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Sep;32(5):873-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07333.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
PMID: 20722715BACKGROUNDKashluba S, Casey JE, Paniak C. Evaluating the utility of ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for postconcussion syndrome following mild traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 Jan;12(1):111-8. doi: 10.1017/S1355617706060036.
PMID: 16433950BACKGROUNDOlesen, J. Section 5.2.2 Persistent headache attributed to mild traumatic injury to the head. IHS Classification ICHD-3 beta (2016). <https://www.ichd-3.org/5-headache-attributed-to-trauma-or-injury-to-the-head-andor-neck/5-2-persistent-headache-attributed-to-traumatic-injury-to-the-head/5-2-2-persistent-headache-attributed-to-mild-traumatic-injury-to-the-head/>.
BACKGROUNDStilling J, Paxman E, Mercier L, Gan LS, Wang M, Amoozegar F, Dukelow SP, Monchi O, Debert C. Treatment of Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache and Post-Concussion Symptoms Using Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Pilot, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jan 15;37(2):312-323. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6692. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
PMID: 31530227DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chantel Debert, MD MSc FRCPC
University of Calgary
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will be randomized with a random number generator to receive either sham or rTMS. Allocation will be concealed through the use of sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2018
First Posted
October 1, 2018
Study Start
April 15, 2017
Primary Completion
September 30, 2018
Study Completion
January 30, 2019
Last Updated
April 22, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-09