Delayed Small-Bowel Anastomosis in Patients With Postoperative Peritonitis
Peritonitis
1 other identifier
observational
114
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Surgical management results for 114 patients with postoperative peritonitis due to small-bowel perforations, necrosis, and anastomotic leakage were comparatively analyzed. Using the APACHE-II (Acute Physiology, Age, Chronic Health Evaluation) and MPI (Mannheim Peritonitis Index) scoring systems, different surgical approaches were examined in three patient groups (primary anastomosis, delayed anastomosis, and enterostomy).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2010
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedJuly 26, 2021
July 1, 2021
15.6 years
September 26, 2018
July 20, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients with recurrent anastomotic leakage
Number of patients in groups 1 and 2
up to 2 months
Study Arms (3)
Group I. Primary anastomosis
Resection of the small bowel to place primary anastomosis into small intestine or transverse colon during relaparotomy.
Group II. Delayed anastomosis
Resection of the small intestine to place delayed anastomosis. After the closure of the afferent and efferent loops of the small intestine, anastomosis was not applied. A decompression probe was introduced into the upper small intestine. In 24-36 hours, delayed anastomosis was placed into the small intestine or transverse colon during the planned relaparotomy with arrested postoperative peritonitis.
Group III. Enterostomy
Resection of the small intestine with enterostomy. In case there was no postoperative peritonitis relief and was organ dysfunction progression, anastomosis was not placed. The surgery was completed with enterostomy to perform open abdomen.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Local patients admitted to the clinic from around Altai Krai cities, suffering from postoperative peritonitis due to small-bowel perforations and small-bowel anastomotic leaks
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of postoperastive peritonitis
- Conducting relaparotomy
You may not qualify if:
- Peritoneal cancer
- Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Zharikov AN, Lubyansky VG, Aliev AR. Surgical techniques for open abdomen in patients with postoperative peritonitis. Bulletin of Medical Science 2(10):76-80, 2018. URL: http://www.agmu.ru/files/%E2%84%962(10)2018.pdf
BACKGROUNDZharikov AN, Lubyansky VG, Aliev AR et al. Staged surgical treatment with temporary laparostomy in patients with postoperative peritonitis. Moscow Surgical Journal 1(41):10-14, 2015. URL: http://mossj.ru/journal/MOSSJ_2015/MXG_2015_01.pdf
BACKGROUNDZharikov AN, Lubyansky VG, Zharikov AA. A differentiated approach to repeat small-bowel anastomoses in patients with postoperative peritonitis: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Oct;46(5):1055-1061. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01084-7. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
PMID: 30719528RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2018
First Posted
October 1, 2018
Study Start
May 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
July 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The first group included 47 patients (41.2%) who underwent conventional surgical management during relaparotomy, taking into account APACHE-II severity of illness and MPI severity of peritonitis. This surgical treatment involved suturing the intestinal wall defects or small-bowel resection to place primary anastomosis. The second patient group included 55 patients (48.2%) to which the delayed anastomosis technique was applied during relaparotomy, taking account the APACHE-II and MPI scores. The third patient group included 12 patients (10.5%) who had the highest risk of small-bowel suture failure when closing the defects in either primary or delayed anastomosis, as well as the risk of new small-bowel perforations to occur. In these cases, resection of the intestine was performed with enterostomy, along with planned relaparotomies and Open Abdomen management.