A Comparison of Standard Laser With Micropulse Laser for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema.
DIAMONDS
Diabetic Macular Oedema and Diode Subthreshold Micropulse Laser (DIAMONDS): A Pragmatic, Multicentre, Allocation Concealed, Prospective, Randomised, Non-inferiority Double-masked Trial
3 other identifiers
interventional
266
1 country
14
Brief Summary
DIAMONDS is a Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial that is being carried out in the UK to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of micropulse laser, compared with standard laser, for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 22, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 22, 2020
CompletedMay 6, 2023
May 1, 2023
6.1 years
December 5, 2017
May 3, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean change in BCdVA in the study eye at 24 months
BCdVA in the study eye is assessed by a BCdVA test (using ETDRS visual acuity charts at 4 meters) at baseline and months 4,8,12,16,20 and 24.
4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 months
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Mean change in binocular BCdVA from baseline to month 24
12 and 24 months
Mean change in central subfield retinal thickness in the study eye
24 months
Mean change in the mean deviation (MD) of the Humphrey 10-2 visual field in the study eye from baseline to month 24
12 and 24 Months
Change in the percentage (%) of people meeting driving standards from baseline to month 24
24 months
Mean change in EQ-5D 5L from baseline to month 24.
24 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Diode Subthreshold Micropulse Laser
EXPERIMENTALDSML is a relatively new laser technology aimed at minimising damage ("tissue-sparing") to choroid and retina but maintaining treatment efficacy by its selective effect on the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). It is performed using laser that, instead of delivering a continuous-wave laser beam, as the standard laser, it provides very small, repetitive, low energy pulses of laser separated by a brief rest period. This rest period allows the tissue to cool down between laser pulses avoiding the increased tissue heat that would be produced by continuous laser and allowing the use of lower laser energy power to achieve an effect. The reduced heat produced in the tissue and the reduced energy power required for the treatment may reduce side effects.
Standard threshold laser (532 nm laser)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGreen-yellow argon laser photocoagulation at threshold levels has been used for many years as the standard laser for the treatment of many retinal disorders including DMO. The ETDRS demonstrated the efficacy of laser in preventing visual loss in patients with DMO.
Interventions
On the day the laser procedure is going to be performed, participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive DSML or standard laser using an automated randomisation system. The DSML surgery will be performed by an Ophthamologist
On the day the laser procedure is going to be performed, participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive DSML or standard laser using an automated randomisation system. The standard laser surgery will be performed by an Ophthamologist
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with diabetic retinopathy and centre involving DMO, as determined by using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), in one or both eyes with:
- Central retinal subfield thickness of \> 300 but \< 400 microns as determined by SD-OCT due to diabetic macular oedema OR
- Central retinal subfield thickness of \< 300 microns provided that intraretinal and/or subretinal fluid is present in the central subfield (central 1 mm) related to diabetic macular oedema AND
- Visual acuity of \> 24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (Snellen equivalent \> 20/320)
- Amenable to laser treatment, as judged by the treating ophthalmologist
- Over 18 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- Eyes of patients will not be included in the study if:
- The macular oedema is due to causes other than diabetic macular oedema such as epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular traction, vein occlusion, or others
- The eye is ineligible for macular laser treatment, as judged by the treating ophthalmologist
- The eye has DMO and central subfield retinal thickness (CST) of \> 400 microns. Doc No: TM09-LB01 Protocol Version 3.0 Final\_ 09/01/17 Page 16 of 34
- The eye has activeA proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) requiring treatment.
- The eye has received intravitreal Anti- Vascular Endothelical Growth Factor (Anti-VEGF) therapy within the previous two months.
- The eye has received macular laser treatment within the previous 12 months.
- The eye has received intravitreal injection of steroids.
- The eye has received cataract surgery within the previous six weeks
- The eye has received panretinal photocoagulation within the previous 3 months The patient is
- Patients on pioglitazone and the drug cannot be stopped 3 months prior to entering into the trial and for the duration of the study
- The patient has chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant
- The patient has any other condition that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude participation in the study (such as unstable medical status or severe disease that would make it difficult for the patient to be able to complete the study)
- The patient has very poor glycemic control and started intensive therapy within the previous 3 months
- The patient will use an investigational drug during the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
Belfast Health & Social Care Trust
Belfast, United Kingdom
Bradford Royal Infirmary
Bradford, United Kingdom
Bristol Eye Hospital
Bristol, United Kingdom
Frimley Park Hospital
Frimley, United Kingdom
Hull and East Yorkshire Hospital
Hull, United Kingdom
Hinchingbrooke Hospital
Huntingdon, United Kingdom
King's College Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Moorefields Eye Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Manchester Eye Hospital
Manchester, United Kingdom
James Cook University Hospital South Tees
Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Newcastle Eye Hospital
Newcastle, United Kingdom
Oxford John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford, United Kingdom
Sheffield Eye Hospital
Sheffield, United Kingdom
City Hopsitals Sunderland
Sunderland, United Kingdom
Related Publications (12)
Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Dec;103(12):1796-806.
PMID: 2866759BACKGROUND[2] NICE guidance. Ranibizumab for treating diabetic macular oedema. TA 237 (STA), superseded by TA 274 (rapid review). ERG Reports
BACKGROUNDLavinsky D, Cardillo JA, Melo LA Jr, Dare A, Farah ME, Belfort R Jr. Randomized clinical trial evaluating mETDRS versus normal or high-density micropulse photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 17;52(7):4314-23. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6828.
PMID: 21345996BACKGROUNDVujosevic S, Bottega E, Casciano M, Pilotto E, Convento E, Midena E. Microperimetry and fundus autofluorescence in diabetic macular edema: subthreshold micropulse diode laser versus modified early treatment diabetic retinopathy study laser photocoagulation. Retina. 2010 Jun;30(6):908-16. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c96986.
PMID: 20168272BACKGROUNDKumar V, Ghosh B, Mehta DK, Goel N. Functional outcome of subthreshold versus threshold diode laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular oedema. Eye (Lond). 2010 Sep;24(9):1459-65. doi: 10.1038/eye.2010.53. Epub 2010 Apr 30.
PMID: 20431612BACKGROUNDFigueira J, Khan J, Nunes S, Sivaprasad S, Rosa A, de Abreu JF, Cunha-Vaz JG, Chong NV. Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;93(10):1341-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.146712. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
PMID: 19054831BACKGROUNDLaursen ML, Moeller F, Sander B, Sjoelie AK. Subthreshold micropulse diode laser treatment in diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Sep;88(9):1173-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.040949.
PMID: 15317711BACKGROUNDSivaprasad S, Dorin G. Subthreshold diode laser micropulse photocoagulation for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012 Mar;9(2):189-97. doi: 10.1586/erd.12.1.
PMID: 22404779BACKGROUNDMinassian DC, Owens DR, Reidy A. Prevalence of diabetic macular oedema and related health and social care resource use in England. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;96(3):345-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2011.204040. Epub 2011 May 20.
PMID: 21602478BACKGROUNDWorld Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available.
PMID: 24141714BACKGROUNDMistry H, Maredza M, Campbell C, Lois N; DIAMONDS study group. Subthreshold micropulse laser versus standard laser for the treatment of central-involving diabetic macular oedema with central retinal thickness of <400micro: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the DIAMONDS trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 18;13(10):e067684. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067684.
PMID: 37852765DERIVEDLois N, Campbell C, Waugh N, Azuara-Blanco A, Maredza M, Mistry H, McAuley D, Acharya N, Aslam TM, Bailey C, Chong V, Downey L, Eleftheriadis H, Fatum S, George S, Ghanchi F, Groppe M, Hamilton R, Menon G, Saad A, Sivaprasad S, Shiew M, Steel DH, Talks JS, Doherty P, McDowell C, Clarke M. Standard threshold laser versus subthreshold micropulse laser for adults with diabetic macular oedema: the DIAMONDS non-inferiority RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(50):1-86. doi: 10.3310/SZKI2484.
PMID: 36541393DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Noemi Lois, MD, PhD
Queen's University, Belfast
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Ophthalmologists undertaking laser treatments for DMO at each of the participating centres will also deliver the treatment for the trial. Although, for obvious reasons, ophthalmologists delivering the treatment will not be masked with regards to the laser used, every effort will be made to ensure that participants and outcome assessors (e.g. optometrists measuring visual function, photographers/technicians/nurses obtaining OCT images and ophthalmic technicians obtaining visual fields) will be masked to the allocated treatment. Patients will not be informed before, during, and after the laser treatment about which technology of laser was used for their treatment. Similarly, the investigators obtaining outcome measures will only have access to the CRF booklet (but not to the notes of the patients) which will contain no information with regards to the type of laser the patient had been allocated or received
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2017
First Posted
October 1, 2018
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 22, 2020
Study Completion
December 22, 2020
Last Updated
May 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share