Efficacy of Laser Application in Dental Bleaching
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: To establish the efficacy of laser application with chemical treatment in dental bleaching compared to chemical treatment alone. Methods: The investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT), single blind (evaluator), in 24 patients randomized to laser and chemical intervention (12) or chemical intervention aloe (12). The commercial products used were Whiteness Hp 35% Hydrogen Peroxide and the LASER of DCM Equipments. The trial outcome measures were obtained using the Vita EasyShade Spectrophotometer and the International CIELCh system. To stablish differences before vs. after treatments and between groups, the T test and chi2 tests were applied.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 5, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 22, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 25, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2018
CompletedOctober 19, 2018
October 1, 2018
17 days
September 21, 2018
October 17, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Dental Color Stage 1(Before Intervention)
The measure of the color was done to the superior canines by just one evaluator. It was done with the Vita Easyshade Spectrophotometer. To improve precision off the data, measures were taken 3 times in all superior canines studied. The Investigators used the values L, C,H.
through study completion, an average of 3 days
Dental Color Stage 2 (30 minutes after dental bleaching)
The measure of the color was done to the superior canines by just one evaluator. It was done with the Vita Easyshade Spectrophotometer. To improve precision off the data, measures were taken 3 times in all superior canines studied. The Investigators used the values L, C,H.
through study completion, an average of 3 days
Dental Color Stage 3 (3 days after dental bleaching)
The measure of the color was done to the superior canines by just one evaluator. It was done with the Vita Easyshade Spectrophotometer. To improve precision off the data, measures were taken 3 times in all superior canines studied. The Investigators used the values L, C,H.
through study completion, an average of 3 days
Change in Color (Stage 3 - Stage 1)
The difference in color was calculated using the international accepted system CIELCh (11,18-19). The formula is ∆E\* = \[(∆L\*)2 + (∆C\*)2 + (∆h\*)2\] ½; were L is Luminosity, C is Chroma and h is Hue. The higher difference in color will show the better intervention.
through study completion, an average of 3 days
Change in Color (Stage 2 - Stage 1)
The difference in color was calculated using the international accepted system CIELCh (11,18-19). The formula is ∆E\* = \[(∆L\*)2 + (∆C\*)2 + (∆h\*)2\] ½; were L is Luminosity, C is Chroma and h is Hue. The higher difference in color will show the better intervention.
through study completion, an average of 3 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Immediate Dental Sensitivity
through study completion, an average of 3 days
Mediate Dental Sensitivity
through study completion, an average of 3 days
Study Arms (2)
Laser Application
EXPERIMENTAL35% Hydrogen Peroxide (Whitening HP, FGM SC Brazil) 40 minutes divided in two phases of 20 minutes each one (5 minutes colocation, 10 minutes Laser Application and 5 minutes moving the product) from premolar to premolar in superior and inferior teeth. Experimental
No Laser Application
NO INTERVENTION35% Hydrogen Peroxide (Whitening HP FGM SC Brazil), 40 minutes divided in two phases of 20 minutes each one (5 minutes colocation, 10 minutes waiting and 5 minutes moving the product) from premolar to premolar in superior and inferior teeth. No Laser Application No Intervention
Interventions
The Laser used was the Whitening Lase II (DCM EQUIPMENTS).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who wanted to bleach or whiten their teeth.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have a color less than A2 according to the Vita Scale
- Patients with dental sensitivity
- caries or restorations
- periodontal disease
- dental abfraction or attrition
- pregnant women, smokers
- patients with orthodontics
- nauseous reflects
- patients who did not wish to sign the consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Facultad de Odontología Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú
Coronel Oviedo, International, 595, Paraguay
Related Publications (6)
González Rosino B. Estudio clínico comparativo entre dos dispositivos de luz para blanqueamientos en clínica. 2014; [citado 17 de julio 2015]. Disponible en: http://eprints.ucm.es/27417/
BACKGROUNDGiannini M, Hirata R, Coelho AS, de Oliveira VAP, Chan DCN. Agentes Blanqueadores y Técnicas Utilizadas en Consultorio. ROBYD [Internet]. 2013 enero-abril;II(1). [citado 22 de julio 2015]. Disponible en: www.rodyb.com/agentes---blanqueadores---y---tecnicas---utilizadas---en--consultorio---27/
BACKGROUNDHenry RK, Bauchmoyer SM, Moore W, Rashid RG. The effect of light on tooth whitening: a split-mouth design. Int J Dent Hyg. 2013 May;11(2):151-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00568.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
PMID: 22783981BACKGROUNDDostalova T, Jelinkova H, Housova D, Sulc J, Nemec M, Miyagi M, et al. Diode laser-activatedbleaching. BrazDent J. 2004;15(Special Issue):3-8. [citado 27 de marzo 2016]. Disponible en: http://blackstar.forp.usp.br/bdj/bdj15si/pdf/v15sia01.pdf
BACKGROUNDWetter NU, Walverde D, Kato IT, Eduardo Cde P. Bleaching efficacy of whitening agents activated by xenon lamp and 960-nm diode radiation. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004 Dec;22(6):489-93. doi: 10.1089/pho.2004.22.489.
PMID: 15684748BACKGROUNDAlomari Q, El Daraa E. A randomized clinical trial of in-office dental bleaching with or without light activation. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010 Jan 1;11(1):E017-24.
PMID: 20098962BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julieta M Méndez, DDs
Facultad de Odontología Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ulises A Villasanti Torales, DDs, Mgst
Facultad de Odontología Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- It was single blind; as the evaluator did not know what intervention the patient was assigned.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor in Dental Surgery, Professor of Research Methodology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2018
First Posted
September 28, 2018
Study Start
September 5, 2015
Primary Completion
September 22, 2015
Study Completion
September 25, 2015
Last Updated
October 19, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- From the time the protocol is available in clinicaltrials.gov and with no limit of time
- Access Criteria
- Researchers that want to know about the study and use the protocol
By email