Comparison of Clinical Outcomes POD L GF vs POD F GF (PHY1707)
Clinical Study to Compare Clinical Outcomes of Hydrophobic Trifocal IOLs FineVision POD F GF and FineVision POD L GF After Bilateral Implantation
1 other identifier
interventional
53
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prospective, randomised, controlled, single-surgeon, single-center clinical study to compare the clinical outcomes of two trifocal IOLs differing in the dominance of additional power. The investigational device POD L GF shows dominance for the intermediate addition (+1.75 D), whereas the control device POD F GF shows dominance for the near addition (+3.5 D). Implantation of the IOLs is bilaterally.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 21, 2021
CompletedJanuary 11, 2022
January 1, 2022
2.5 years
September 26, 2018
January 7, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Monocular Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) under photopic light conditions.
No statistically significant difference between the two study groups on monocular CDVA at 3 months follow up visit. A significance level of 0.05 or lower (p \< 0.05) will be considered statistically significant. CDVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 4m distance with best aided corrective glasses according to ISO 11979-7:2014.
3 months postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Manifested refraction
3 months postoperative
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) under photopic light conditions
3 months postoperative
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) under mesopic light conditions
6 months postoperative
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) under photopic light conditions
3 months postoperative
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) under mesopic light conditions
6 months postoperative
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
IOL Implantation experimental
EXPERIMENTALhydrophobic, trifocal intraocular lens POD L GF with light distribution far \> intermediate \> near
IOL Implantation Comparator
ACTIVE COMPARATORhydrophobic, trifocal intraocular lens POD F GF with light distribution far \> near \> intermediate
Interventions
Implantation of trifocal IOL POD F GF consisting of light distribution order: far \> intermediate \> near
Implantation of trifocal IOL POD F GF consisting of light distribution order: far \> near \> intermediate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cataractous eyes and/or patients suffering from presbyopia with no ocular comorbidity
- Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with examination procedures
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Age of patient \<40 years
- Irregular astigmatism
- Regular corneal astigmatism \>0.75 dioptres by an automatic keratometer or biometer or \>1.0 dioptres if the steep axis of cylinder is between 90° and 120°
- Difficulty for cooperation (distance from their home, general health condition)
- Acute or chronic disease or illness that would increase risk or confound study results (e.g. diabetes mellitus (with retinopathy), immunocompromised, glaucoma etc…)
- Any ocular comorbidity
- History of ocular trauma or prior ocular surgery including refractive procedures
- Capsule or zonular abnormalities that may affect postoperative centration or tilt of the lens (e.g. pseudoexfoliation syndrome, chronic Uveitis, Marfan's syndrome)
- Pupil abnormalities (non-reactive, tonic pupils, abnormally shaped pupils or pupils that do not dilate under mesopic/scotopic conditions)
- AMD suspicious eyes
- Complicated surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Semmelweis University - Department of Ophthalmology
Budapest, 1085, Hungary
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zoltan Nagy, MD
Semmelweis University - Department of Ophthalmology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2018
First Posted
September 28, 2018
Study Start
July 30, 2018
Primary Completion
February 1, 2021
Study Completion
September 21, 2021
Last Updated
January 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share