NCT03685058

Brief Summary

The standard-of-care preventive measures to stop early tooth decay from becoming worse is by fluoride application, diet counseling, and oral hygiene instructions. This standard way is not always successful. The purpose of this study is to compare standard-of-care preventive measures to stop further tooth decay to standard-of-care preventive measures in addition to a light curable resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) varnish material (Vanish XT). The material is used for root surface sensitivity treatment, site specific protective coating for newly erupted teeth and other tooth surfaces including early tooth decay. To be in this study the child must be five to eight years old, medically healthy, attending the Pediatric Dentistry Clinics in King Abdulaziz University Dental Hospital (KAUDH),diagnosed to have at least two primary molars and/ or first permanent molars with early-stage caries (using bitewing radiographs, near infrared digital imaging transilluminaton (NIDIT), and visual assessment), and willing to return for follow up visits. If the child is eligible and the parents agree to the participation of their child in this study, the researcher will review the child's personal and medical history. The child's two included molars diagnosed with early-stage caries will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Control Group: will receive standard-of-care preventive measures. Test Group: will receive RMGI varnish application plus the standard-of-care preventive measures. The child will be followed up at six months and 12 months. A dental examination will be done using the same methods used in the first examination to determine whether the caries has become deeper or not. The child may be withdrawn from the study at this point if the caries has become too deep and the tooth will then need a filling. The child's medical status will be up-dated, reinforcement of oral hygiene instruction and diet counseling will be provided, and fluoride varnish application will be applied to all the teeth in both six and 12 months follow-ups.The RMGI varnish will be reapplied to the test teeth at the six months follow up.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
88

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 10, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 11, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 26, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

December 4, 2018

Status Verified

November 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

October 10, 2017

Last Update Submit

November 30, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Initial caries treatmentNon-cavitated caries treatmentIncipient caries treatmentProximal cariesPrimary teethLight curable resin modified glass ionomer varnishVanish XT varnishClinpro XT varnishDental white spot lesions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Clinical progression of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions measured using ICDAS six months after treatment

    To evaluate the clinical progression of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions in primary molars and first permanent molars measured using the ICDAS after treatment with light curable RMGI varnish in addition to standard-of-care preventive measures compared to standard-of-care preventive measures alone after six months.

    After six of treatment

  • Clinical progression of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions measured using ICDAS 12 months after treatment

    To evaluate the clinical progression of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions in primary molars and first permanent molars measured using the ICDAS after treatment with light curable RMGI varnish in addition to standard-of-care preventive measures compared to standard-of-care preventive measures alone after 12 months.

    After 12 months.

  • Radiographic progression of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions assessed using bitewing radiographs six months after treatment

    To evaluate the radiographic progression of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions in primary molars and first permanent molars assessed by examination of bitewing radiographs after treatment with light curable RMGI varnish in addition to standard-of-care preventive measures compared to standard-of-care preventive measures alone after six months.

    After six months

  • Radiographic progression of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions assessed using bitewing radiographs 12 months after treatment

    To evaluate the radiographic progression of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions in primary molars and first permanent molars assessed by examination of bitewing radiographs after treatment with light curable RMGI varnish in addition to standard-of-care preventive measures compared to standard-of-care preventive measures alone after 12 months.

    After 12 months

  • Progression of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions measured with NILT six months after treatment

    To evaluate the progression of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions in primary molars and first permanent molars measured with NILT after treatment with light curable RMGI varnish in addition to standard-of-care preventive measures compared to standard-of-care preventive measures alone after six months.

    After six months

  • Progression of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions measured with NILT 12 months after treatment

    To evaluate the progression of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions in primary molars and first permanent molars measured with NILT after treatment with light curable RMGI varnish in addition to standard-of-care preventive measures compared to standard-of-care preventive measures alone after 12 months.

    After 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • The effect of plaque accumulation on the success rate of the treatment

    After 12 months

  • The effect of gingival inflammation on the success rate of the treatment

    After 12 months

  • he effect of the presence of adjacent restoration on the success rate of the treatment

    After 12 months

  • The effect of caries severity on the success rate of the treatment

    After 12 months

Study Arms (2)

The control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A total of 88 non-cavitated proximal carious lesions treated with standard-of-care preventive measures which include application of 5% sodium fluoride topical varnish (Vanish 5% Sodium Fluoride White Varnish with Tri-Calcium Phosphate, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A.), oral hygiene instruction, and dietary counseling applied at initial, six-months follow-up, and 12-months follow-up visits.

Other: standard-of-care preventive measures

The test group

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention: A total of 88 non-cavitated proximal carious lesions treated with light curable resin modified glass ionomer varnish (Vanishâ„¢ XT Extended Contact Varnish, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A.) at initial and six-months follow-up visits. In addition to, standard-of-care preventive measures, applied at initial, six-months follow-up, and 12-months follow-up visits.

Device: Light curable resin modified glass ionomer varnishOther: standard-of-care preventive measures

Interventions

Treatment of non-cavitated proximal carious lesions with light curable resin modified glass ionomer varnish at initial and six-months follow-up visits, in addition, the patient will receive standard-of-care preventive measures, at initial, six-months follow-up, and 12-months follow-up visits.

Also known as: Vanishâ„¢ XT Extended Contact Varnish
The test group

Patient will receive standard-of-care preventive measures which include application of 5% sodium fluoride topical varnish, oral hygiene instructions, and dietary counseling at initial, six-months follow-up, and 12-months follow-up visits

The control groupThe test group

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 8 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • The child has at least two matched bilateral primary molars and/or first permanent molars with proximal carious lesions in the same surfaces in enamel or outer dentin third as by bitewing radiographic examination and are non-cavitated by visual examination.
  • Their ages are five to eight years.
  • Healthy.
  • No known allergies to any of the components of the dental materials used in the study.
  • The parents are willing to commit to the follow-up visits.
  • Child is generally cooperative for dental treatment.
  • Primary molar and/or first permanent molars with a proximal carious lesion in enamel or outer dentin third assessed by bitewing radiographic examination and that is found to be non-cavitated after ICDAS visual examination.
  • Presence of a tooth adjacent to the lesion.
  • Normal tooth structure.
  • Absence of tooth mobility.
  • Tooth does not require restorative treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Children with a medical history of a chronic disease.
  • Children who have abnormalities that affect tooth structure.
  • The need of sedation or general anesthesia for dental treatment.
  • Primary molar and/or first permanent molars with a proximal carious lesion extending beyond the outer dentin third assessed by bitewing radiographic examination.
  • Primary molar and/or first permanent molars with a proximal carious lesion that is cavitated assessed by ICDAS visual examination.
  • Non-cavitated proximal carious lesion on the mesial of the first primary molars because the contact area with the primary canine is narrow and the possible presence of the primate space.
  • Distal surfaces of the first permanent molars because there is no contact with the second permanent molar (does not erupt in this age group).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

King abulaziz University, Dental University Hospital

Jeddah, P.O Box 80209, 21589, Saudi Arabia

RECRUITING

Related Publications (12)

  • Mehta A, Paramshivam G, Chugh VK, Singh S, Halkai S, Kumar S. Effect of light-curable fluoride varnish on enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets: an in-vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Nov;148(5):814-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.05.022.

    PMID: 26522042BACKGROUND
  • Young DA, Novy BB, Zeller GG, Hale R, Hart TC, Truelove EL; American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs; American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The American Dental Association Caries Classification System for clinical practice: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015 Feb;146(2):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2014.11.018.

    PMID: 25637205BACKGROUND
  • Anusavice KJ. Present and future approaches for the control of caries. J Dent Educ. 2005 May;69(5):538-54.

    PMID: 15897335BACKGROUND
  • Sochtig F, Hickel R, Kuhnisch J. Caries detection and diagnostics with near-infrared light transillumination: clinical experiences. Quintessence Int. 2014 Jun;45(6):531-8. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a31533.

    PMID: 24618570BACKGROUND
  • Ekstrand KR, Martignon S, Ricketts DJ, Qvist V. Detection and activity assessment of primary coronal caries lesions: a methodologic study. Oper Dent. 2007 May-Jun;32(3):225-35. doi: 10.2341/06-63.

    PMID: 17555173BACKGROUND
  • GREENE JC, VERMILLION JR. THE SIMPLIFIED ORAL HYGIENE INDEX. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964 Jan;68:7-13. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1964.0034. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14076341BACKGROUND
  • Weyant RJ, Tracy SL, Anselmo TT, Beltran-Aguilar ED, Donly KJ, Frese WA, Hujoel PP, Iafolla T, Kohn W, Kumar J, Levy SM, Tinanoff N, Wright JT, Zero D, Aravamudhan K, Frantsve-Hawley J, Meyer DM; American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs Expert Panel on Topical Fluoride Caries Preventive Agents. Topical fluoride for caries prevention: executive summary of the updated clinical recommendations and supporting systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Nov;144(11):1279-91. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0057.

    PMID: 24177407BACKGROUND
  • Guideline on Caries-risk Assessment and Management for Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Pediatr Dent. 2016 Oct;38(6):142-149. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27931452BACKGROUND
  • Espelid I, Tveit AB. Clinical and radiographic assessment of approximal carious lesions. Acta Odontol Scand. 1986 Feb;44(1):31-7. doi: 10.3109/00016358609041295.

    PMID: 3456691BACKGROUND
  • Martignon S, Ekstrand KR, Ellwood R. Efficacy of sealing proximal early active lesions: an 18-month clinical study evaluated by conventional and subtraction radiography. Caries Res. 2006;40(5):382-8. doi: 10.1159/000094282.

    PMID: 16946605BACKGROUND
  • Bagher SM, Hegazi FM, Finkelman M, Ramesh A, Gowharji N, Swee G, Felemban O, Loo CY. Radiographic Effectiveness of Resin Infiltration in Arresting Incipient Proximal Enamel Lesions in Primary Molars. Pediatr Dent. 2018 May 15;40(3):195-200.

    PMID: 29793566BACKGROUND
  • Felemban OM, Khan JA, Alamoudi NM, El-Ashiry EA, Bagher SM. Perception of Pain With Bitewing, DIAGNOcam, and Teeth Separation Amongst Children. Int Dent J. 2024 Jun;74(3):631-637. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.11.002. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Najlaa M Alamoudi, BDS,MSc,DSc

    King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Najlaa M Alamoudi, BDS,MSc,DSc

CONTACT

Jihan A Khan, BDS,MSc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Because of the nature of the study, the investigator who will apply the treatment will not be blind to the group allocation of the lesion. Yet, the investigators who will evaluate the radiographs, DIAGNOcam images, and perform the visual examination will be blinded to which group the lesion they are evaluating belongs. In addition, the statistician will be blinded.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study design will be a split mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial in which the teeth will be randomly assigned to be either in the test group or control group in a 1:1 ratio. The control group: will be treated with standard-of-care preventive measures which includes application of 5% sodium fluoride (NaF) topical varnish, oral hygiene instruction, and dietary counseling. The test group: will be treated with light curable resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) varnish in addition to standard-of-care preventive measures.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor in Pediatric Dentistry Department, Medical Director, KAU-DH Program Director, Post Grad Studies for Master and PhD programs Program Director,of Saudi Commission for Health Specialities, Faculty of Dentistry- King Abdulaziz University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2017

First Posted

September 26, 2018

Study Start

January 11, 2018

Primary Completion

July 1, 2019

Study Completion

November 1, 2019

Last Updated

December 4, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-11

Locations