Oral Dydrogesterone (OD) Versus Micronized Vaginal Progesterone (MVP) for Luteal Phase Support (LPS) in IVF/ICSI
Oral Dydrogesterone Versus Micronized Vaginal Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support in In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF)/ IntraCytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI): Pharmacokinetics and the Impact on the Endometrium, the Microbiota of the Genital Tract and the Peripheral Immunology. Double Blind Crossover Study.
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Female inability to conceive a child. The purpose of this prospective randomized, double-blinded, double dummy, two-arm cross-over study is to investigate the difference on histological, transcriptional and immunological level in endometrium between 3x10mg Dydrogesterone oral tablets and 3x200 mg Micronized progesterone intravaginal capsules for the luteal support in egg cell donors. Beside that, the pharmacokinetics, the impact on the peripheral immunology (by blood sampling) and the microbiota (by genital swabs) will be investigated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started May 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 24, 2020
CompletedDecember 17, 2020
December 1, 2020
1.3 years
September 4, 2018
December 14, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Molecular endometrial level using illumina RNA-seq
To study the difference of OD versus MVP as LPS after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) on the molecular endometrial level using Illumina RNA-seq on endometrial derived single cell suspensions
On the eight day (at 8am) of LPS intake
Molecular endometrial level using immunohistochemistry
To study the difference of OD versus MVP as LPS after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) on the molecular endometrial level using immunohistochemistry on endometrial derived single cell suspensions
On the eight day (at 8am) of LPS intake
Molecular endometrial level using flow cytometry
To study the difference of OD versus MVP as LPS after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) on the molecular endometrial level using flow cytometry on endometrial derived single cell suspensions
On the eight day (at 8am) of LPS intake
Secondary Outcomes (23)
Difference in pharmacokinetic profile: Progesterone: AUC0-τ
On the first and eight day of LPS intake: 1 hour before morning dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 1 hour 30, 2 hours, 2 hours 30, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours post-dose. One blood sample on the 9th, 10th and 11th day.
Difference in pharmacokinetic profile: Progesterone: AUC0-t
On the first day of LPS intake: 1 hour before morning dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 1 hour 30, 2 hours, 2 hours 30, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours post-dose.
Difference in pharmacokinetic profile: Progesterone: Cmax
On the first and eight day of LPS intake: 1 hour before morning dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 1 hour 30, 2 hours, 2 hours 30, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours post-dose. One blood sample on the 9th, 10th and 11th day.
Difference in pharmacokinetic profile: Progesterone: tmax
On the first and eight day of LPS intake: 1 hour before morning dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 1 hour 30, 2 hours, 2 hours 30, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours post-dose. One blood sample on the 9th, 10th and 11th day.
Difference in pharmacokinetic profile: Progesterone: Ctrough
On the eight day of LPS intake: 1 hour before morning dose.
- +18 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group l: 1st cycle MVP/placebo OD
OTHER2 cycles of controlled ovarian stimulation, dual triggering, oocyte retrieval (OR) and LPS, with an interval period of 2 to 12 months. The only difference of the second cycle being the other LPS study medication as compared to the first cycle. * 1st cycle: Start on day of oocyte retrieval (OR) (=d1): Dydrogesterone Oral Tablet 10 mg 3 times daily + Placebo micronized vaginal progesterone 200 mg capsules 3 times daily, for 8 days. * 2nd cycle: Start on day of oocyte retrieval (OR) (=day 1): 'Micronized Progesterone 200 mg intravaginal capsules 3 times daily + placebo 'Dydrogesterone Oral Tablet 10 mg 3 times daily, for 8 days.
Group ll: 1st cycle placebo MVP/OD
OTHER2 cycles of controlled ovarian stimulation, dual triggering, oocyte retrieval (OR) and LPS, with an interval period of 2 to 12 months. The only difference of the second cycle being the other LPS study medication as compared to the first cycle. * 1st cycle: Start on day of oocyte retrieval (OR) (=day 1): Micronized Progesterone 200 mg intravaginal capsules 3 times daily + placebo Dydrogesterone Oral Tablet 10 mg 3 times daily, for 8 days. * 2nd cycle: Start on day of oocyte retrieval (OR) (=day 1): Dydrogesterone Oral Tablet 10 mg 3 times daily + Placebo micronized progesterone 200 mg intravaginal capsules 3 times daily, for 8 days.
Interventions
Tablet, oral, 10 mg, 3 times daily, starting on the day of oocyte retrieval in the morning and during 8 days
Capsule, vaginal, 200 mg, 3 times daily, starting on the day of oocyte retrieval in the morning and during 8 days
Tablet, indistinguishable from dydrogesterone oral tablet
Capsule, indistinguishable from micronized vaginal progesterone capsules
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Oocyte donor candidates
- Regularly cycling
- BMI ≥18 and ≤ 29 kg/m2
- Signed informed consent
- Non-smokers.
- AMH \<7,53 and \>1,18 ng/mL (90th and 10th percentile for healthy women aged 25-29 according to the used Elecsys® AMH kit by Roche)
- PRL, T and TSH within the normal limits for the clinical laboratory, or considered not clinically significant by the investigator within 6 months prior or at screening
You may not qualify if:
- Intra-uterine device
- Previous enrollment
- Evidence of cardiovascular, respiratory, urogenital, gastrointestinal/hepatic, hematologic/immunologic, HEENT (head, ears, eyes, nose, throat), dermatologic/connective tissue, musculoskeletal, metabolic/nutritional, endocrine, neurologic/psychiatric, allergy, recent major surgery (\< 3 months), or other relevant diseases as revealed by history, physical examination and/or laboratory assessments which could limit participation in or completion of the study
- Acute urogenital disease during the course of the study
- Known allergic reactions to progesterone / dydrogesterone products (active substance or to any of the excipients)
- Intake of any experimental drug or any participation in any other clinical trial within 30 days prior to study start.
- Mental disability or any other lack of fitness, in the investigator's opinion, to preclude subjects in or to complete the study.
- Current or recent substance abuse, including alcohol and tobacco (patients who stopped tobacco usage at least 3 months prior to screening visit would be allowed)
- Refusal or inability to comply with the requirements of the study protocol for any reason, including scheduled clinic visits and laboratory tests.
- Known or suspected progestogen dependent neoplasms (e.g. meningioma)
- Serum progesterone level \>1.5 ng/mL at ovulation triggering
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CRG UZ Brussellead
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorfcollaborator
- Abbottcollaborator
- KU Leuvencollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centrum voor Reproductieve Geneeskunde
Jette, Brussels Capital, 1090, Belgium
Related Publications (1)
Tournaye H, Sukhikh GT, Kahler E, Griesinger G. A Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal support in in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1019-1027. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex023.
PMID: 28333318BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Herman Tournaye, PhD, MD
Head of department CRG
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinded and packaged medication will be provided to the investigational site and dispensed to the participants. The participants, their treating physicians and the investigators will be blinded for the randomization of subjects to the treatment groups. Of both treatment medications, OD and MVP, a placebo version will be available and administered in both oocyte donation cycles. The medication will be given in a double blind double dummy fashion. All the tablets and capsules will be identical in appearance, shape, smell and taste, and packaged in the proper proportion to assure desired dosages and maintenance of the blinding.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2018
First Posted
September 19, 2018
Study Start
May 1, 2019
Primary Completion
August 24, 2020
Study Completion
August 24, 2020
Last Updated
December 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12