Comparison of a Web-based Advance Directive to a Standard Advance Directive
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare a web-based advance directive to a standard advance directive.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2020
CompletedMay 7, 2020
May 1, 2020
1 year
September 7, 2018
May 6, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
New documentation of advance care planning in the EHR
any new advance directive or advance care planning note, excluding an advance directive that either 1) contains only information on the patient's preferred surrogate decision-makers, or 2) is blank except for personal identifying information.
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in satisfaction with end-of-life plans
Initial completed at enrollment, survey sent again at 15 days
Acceptability
Survey sent at 15 days (reminders at 2 week intervals x 2, then phone call)
Self reporting sharing with surrogate
Survey sent at 15 days (reminders 4, 6)Survey sent at 15 days (reminders at 2 week intervals x 2, then phone call)
Self reporting completion
Survey sent at 15 days (reminders at 2 week intervals x 2, then phone call)
Qualitative feedback
Survey sent at 15 days (reminders at 2 week intervals x 2, then phone call)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Web-based AD
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be encouraged to use the web platform for advance care planning/advance directive to document their care preferences..
Paper AD
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be given the standard advance directive and encouraged to complete on their own.
Interventions
Ourcarewishes (OCW) is a web-based platform to document advance care planning based at Penn. OCW contains more detailed content on preferences and values than a standard advance directive and allows electronic sharing with loved ones and transmission to the Penn EHR.
Patients receive a paper copy of an advance directive used by social workers at Penn Medicine and are encouraged to complete on their own.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pancreatic cancer, any stage except stage 0 (C25),
- NSCLC, stage IIIA or higher (C34),
- SCLC, any stage (C34),
- Colon cancer, stage IIIB or greater (C18),
- Rectal cancer, stage IIB or greater (C21),
- Esophageal cancer (adeno or squamous), any stage (C15),
- Stomach cancer, stage IIB or greater (C16),
- Gallbladder cancer, stage I or greater (C23),
- Cholangiocarcinoma, any stage (C22.1),
- HCC, any stage (no plan for transplant) (C22.0),
- Malignant carcinoid of GI tract, stage IV (C7A.019).
You may not qualify if:
- Does not have an active patient portal (MyPennMedicine) account,
- Does not use email at least once per month,
- Has already completed a living will,
- Does not speak fluent English,
- Unwilling to be contacted by email,
- Determined to be too ill or inappropriate for participation by patient's oncologist.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ruth & Raymond Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Related Publications (2)
Halpern SD, Loewenstein G, Volpp KG, Cooney E, Vranas K, Quill CM, McKenzie MS, Harhay MO, Gabler NB, Silva T, Arnold R, Angus DC, Bryce C. Default options in advance directives influence how patients set goals for end-of-life care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):408-17. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0895.
PMID: 23381535BACKGROUNDSudore RL, Landefeld CS, Barnes DE, Lindquist K, Williams BA, Brody R, Schillinger D. An advance directive redesigned to meet the literacy level of most adults: a randomized trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):165-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.015. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
PMID: 17942272BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Patients will be blinded to the comparison being made, but not to the intervention in their arm.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 7, 2018
First Posted
September 18, 2018
Study Start
October 15, 2018
Primary Completion
October 20, 2019
Study Completion
February 20, 2020
Last Updated
May 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05