NCT03674879

Brief Summary

To compare the effectiveness of text message versus voice call as a method of contact for providing results of diagnostic tests and assuring ongoing care from the pediatric emergency department.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 19, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 18, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

September 18, 2018

Status Verified

September 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

July 19, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 14, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Follow UpText Messaging

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of phone call or text message attempts to successful contact with study participant

    A study practitioner will make one attempt per business day to contact the patient or caregiver to provide test results and arrange follow-up care; the method will be determined by the study arm to which the participant is assigned. Participants in the standard practice control arm will receive a telephone call. If a call is not answered, a voice message will be left instructing the patient/parent to call the Pediatric Follow-Up Office. Participants in the intervention arm will receive a text message using the same script. A successful contact will be recorded when a practitioner speaks directly to the patient or parent/guardian via phone.

    Within 2 weeks.

Study Arms (2)

Phone Call

NO INTERVENTION

Follow up contact is attempted via phone call.

Text Message

EXPERIMENTAL

Follow up contact is attempted via text message.

Other: Text Message

Interventions

Patient contact attempted with text message.

Text Message

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • patients under the age of 18 who have had diagnostic testing without finalized results prior to discharge from the emergency department

You may not qualify if:

  • Admitted patients
  • Patients transferred to another facility
  • Patients with critical values as results
  • Do not have devices that can receive phone and text messages
  • Cannot read English or Spanish

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (6)

  • Dudas RA, Pumilia JN, Crocetti M. Pediatric caregiver attitudes and technologic readiness toward electronic follow-up communication in an urban community emergency department. Telemed J E Health. 2013 Jun;19(6):493-6. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0166. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

    PMID: 23570276BACKGROUND
  • Horne A, Ros SP. Telephone follow-up of patients discharged from the emergency department: how reliable? Pediatr Emerg Care. 1995 Jun;11(3):173-5. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199506000-00008.

    PMID: 7651874BACKGROUND
  • Levitt MA, Johnson S, Engelstad L, Montana R, Stewart S. Clinical management of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection in a county teaching emergency department--concerns in overtreatment, undertreatment, and follow-up treatment success. J Emerg Med. 2003 Jul;25(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(03)00131-8.

    PMID: 12865101BACKGROUND
  • Neuner B, Fleming M, Born R, Weiss-Gerlach E, Neumann T, Rettig J, Lau A, Schoenfeld H, Kallischnigg G, Spies C. Predictors of loss to follow-up in young patients with minor trauma after screening and written intervention for alcohol in an urban emergency department. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jan;68(1):133-40. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.133.

    PMID: 17149527BACKGROUND
  • Reed JL, Huppert JS, Taylor RG, Gillespie GL, Byczkowski TL, Kahn JA, Alessandrini EA. Improving sexually transmitted infection results notification via mobile phone technology. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Nov;55(5):690-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 21.

    PMID: 24962503BACKGROUND
  • Reed JL, Simendinger L, Griffeth S, Kim HG, Huppert JS. Point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections increases awareness and short-term abstinence in adolescent women. J Adolesc Health. 2010 Mar;46(3):270-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Oct 12.

    PMID: 20159505BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Czer Anthoney E Lim, MD

    Jacobi Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2016

First Posted

September 18, 2018

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion

August 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

September 18, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share