Imatinib for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Relapses
1 other identifier
interventional
200
4 countries
14
Brief Summary
To investigate if treatment with Imatinib results in a better outcome than standard care in form of Methylprednisolone(MP) after MS-associated relapses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 multiple-sclerosis
Started Oct 2018
Longer than P75 for phase_2 multiple-sclerosis
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2023
CompletedAugust 2, 2021
July 1, 2021
4.3 years
September 14, 2018
July 30, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Functional system score (FSS) change in the most worsened FSS after 28 days due to the acute relapse
The primary endpoint is mean change between baseline and day 28 in the most worsened FSS due to the acute relapse comparing MP and Imatinib. In case more than one domain is affected, priority of selected FSS should be in the following order: 1) Pyramidal, 2) Brain stem, 3) Cerebellar, 4) Visual, 5) Sensory. At least a two step deterioration due to neuroinflammatory bout should have occurred. Bowel and Cerebral domains will not be considered in the primary endpoints. The FSS is graded accordingly: 1. Visual function. Grade 0-6 2. Brain stem function grade 0-5 3. Pyramidal function, grade 0-6 4. Cerebellar function, grade 0-5 5. Sensory function grade 0-6 6. bowel/bladder function 7. Cerebral functions
28 days
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Functional system score (FSS) change between baseline and week 12 in the most worsened FSS due to the acute relapse
12 weeks
Mean expanded disability status scale (EDSS) change between baseline and day 28
28 days
Mean change in 9-hole peg test (evaluates upper limb function) between baseline and day 28
28 days
Mean change in timed 25- walk between baseline and day 28
28 days
Mean change in symbol digital modality test (SDMT) between baseline and day 28
28 days
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Imatinib
EXPERIMENTALImatinib will be administered orally one tablet (400mg) twice daily, 800mg per day for 14 consecutive days.
Methylprednisolone
ACTIVE COMPARATORMethylprednisolone will be administered once a day either in tablets; Medrol 1g per day or iv; Solumedrol 1000 mg per day, both for three consecutive days.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age
- Affection of any of the following EDSS sub-domains representing the targeted neurological deficit: 1. Visual function. grade 0-6, 2. Brain stem function grade 0-5. 3. Pyramidal function, grade 0-6. 4. Cerebellar function, grade 0-5. 5. Sensory function grade 0-6, and deterioration at least one step in any of these EDSS domains
- EDSS ≤ 6 before the acute exacerbation
- Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, if they are using effective methods of contraception during the study. Acceptable birth control methods are those with a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly according to CTFG, September 2014 "Recommendations related to contraception and pregnancy testing in clinical trials". Such methods include:
- Combined (estrogen and progestogen containing hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation.
- oral
- intravaginal
- transdermal
- progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation
- oral
- injectable
- implantable
- intrauterine device (IUD)
- intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
- bilateral tubal occlusion
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- A pseudo-relapse should be excluded, as deemed by the experienced treating neurologist, and as evidenced by an active infection, likely with fever, with reappearing new signs and symptoms in a previously affected neurological function.
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Concomitant medication with drugs which may increase the plasma concentration of Imatinib - ketoconazole, itraconazole , erythromycin and clarithromycin
- Concomitant medication with drugs which may decrease the plasma concentration of Imatinib: dexamethasone, phenytoin, carbamazepin, rifampicin, phenobarbital, fosphenytoin, primidon, Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort).
- Female patients with childbearing potential, if pregnancy cannot be excluded by pregnancy test (urine point-of-care pregnancy test).
- Patient is participating in other interventional study
- General infection or any other condition judged by the treating neurologist to contra-indicate Imatinib
- Patients with a positive Hepatitis B-DNA test result or serology indicating latent infection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tomas Olssonlead
- The Swedish Research Councilcollaborator
Study Sites (14)
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Uniklinik Köln
Cologne, 50937, Germany
Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246, Germany
UKSH Campus Kiel
Kiel, 24105, Germany
Haukeland sjukhus
Bergen, 5021, Norway
Akershus University Hospital
Lørenskog, 1478, Norway
Rikshospitalet, Oslo
Oslo, 0372, Norway
Ullevåls sjukhus
Oslo, 0424, Norway
Karolinska Universityhospital, Huddinge
Huddinge, Stockholm County, 14186, Sweden
Neurology Sahlgrenska Hospital
Gothenburg, 41345, Sweden
Linköping University Hospital
Linköping, 58185, Sweden
Akademiskt specialistcentrum
Stockholm, 11341, Sweden
Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Solna
Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, 75185, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Treating physician not blinded, evaluating physician blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2018
First Posted
September 17, 2018
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
July 30, 2023
Last Updated
August 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share