Study Stopped
Attending surgeon on the project is moving to a different facility
Dynamic ACL Brace: In Vivo Kinematics
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the Össur Rebound dynamic ACL brace on knee kinematics evaluated using dynamic stereo X-ray (DSX) imaging during functional activities. Brace performance will be evaluated before and after ACL reconstruction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Oct 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedApril 29, 2026
April 1, 2026
6 months
September 6, 2018
April 23, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Dynamic tibiofemoral kinematics during activities of daily living in ACL-deficient knees
This study will use dynamic stereo x-ray (pulsed bi-plane fluoroscopy) to measure the dynamic movements of the tibiofemoral joint during walking and stair-climbing, focusing on differences in anterior-posterior sliding and internal/external rotation of the tibia relative to femur, between the braced ACL-deficient knee, unbraced ACL-deficient knee, and the contralateral/uninjured knee.
<1wk (pre-operative)
Dynamic tibiofemoral kinematics during sports activities in ACL-reconstructed-knees
This study will use dynamic stereo x-ray (pulsed bi-plane fluoroscopy) to measure the dynamic movements of the tibiofemoral joint during dynamic movements and sports activities, focusing on differences in anterior-posterior sliding and internal/external rotation of the tibia relative to femur, between the braced ACL-reconstructed knee, unbraced ACL-reconstructed knee, and contralateral/uninjured knee.
7-9 months (post-operative)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Percent symmetry in 3D motion capture kinematics and kinetics
<1wk; 7-9months
Muscle contribution levels in braced vs unbraced knee
<1wk; 7-9 months
Subject Satisfaction
2 months; 4 months; 7-9 months
Study Arms (1)
Knee Brace
EXPERIMENTALACL-reconstruction patients will be issued an Ossur Rebound ACL Brace at the time of enrollment in the study, prior to surgery. They will use this brace throughout their rehab and physical therapy. Dynamic X-ray imaging of the knee will take place prior to surgery, and again upon clearance from physical therapy 7-9 months after surgery. The injured knee will be imaged with and without the brace, and the contralateral limb will be imaged for use as a control.
Interventions
ACL-reconstruction patients will be issued an Ossur Rebound ACL Brace at the time of enrollment in the study, prior to surgery. They will use this brace throughout their rehab and physical therapy. The intervention (brace) will be applied only to the surgical limb.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral, complete ACL (Anterior Cruciate Ligament) ruptures (must be documented by prior MRI)
- No other concomitant lower extremity injuries and an uninjured contralateral limb
- Acute ACL tears that will be scheduled for ACL reconstruction with Dr. Robert F. LaPrade
- Minimal swelling and pain
- Able and willing to perform the required study activities
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgery or significant injury to either knee
- Relevant surgery, procedure, injury, or condition in the past two years which may affect knee pain or general movement patterns on either side
- Diagnosis of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid conditions, cancers, or other conditions which may affect musculoskeletal health
- Women who are pregnant, or trying/planning to become pregnant during the next 10 months
- Known balance or vestibular disorders
- Persons with a history of significant radiation exposure, whether occupational or medical in nature (Anyone with a history of medical radiation therapy, for cancer or other conditions, is excluded from the study. Those who have an annual occupational radiation exposure greater than 25mSv may not enroll.)
- Persons with a pacemaker, hearing aid, aneurysm clip or artificial heart valve, or other forms of loose metal implants
- Allergy or sensitivity to silver or latex
- Adults lacking capacity to consent for themselves
- Participants who do not pass their return-to-sport test within 7-9 months of ACL-Reconstruction surgery will be excluded from the second phase of testing.
- Participants who no longer pass the MRI screening at the time of Phase 2 testing (for example, who have a new loose metal implant), will be excluded from the MRI portion of the testing only.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Steadman Philippon Research Institutelead
- Össur Iceland ehfcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Steadman Philippon Research Institute
Vail, Colorado, 81657, United States
Related Publications (7)
Butler DL, Noyes FR, Grood ES. Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Mar;62(2):259-70. No abstract available.
PMID: 7358757BACKGROUNDKiapour AM, Murray MM. Basic science of anterior cruciate ligament injury and repair. Bone Joint Res. 2014 Feb 4;3(2):20-31. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.32.2000241. Print 2014.
PMID: 24497504BACKGROUNDMarshall, T., Gelber, J., & Spindler, K. (2016). Postoperative Knee Bracing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, 24(1), 55-58. DOI: 10.1053/j.otsm.2015.10.001
BACKGROUNDCook FF, Tibone JE, Redfern FC. A dynamic analysis of a functional brace for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med. 1989 Jul-Aug;17(4):519-24. doi: 10.1177/036354658901700412.
PMID: 2782535BACKGROUNDSmith SD, Laprade RF, Jansson KS, Aroen A, Wijdicks CA. Functional bracing of ACL injuries: current state and future directions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 May;22(5):1131-41. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2514-z. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
PMID: 23624655BACKGROUNDMayr HO, Stueken P, Munch EO, Wolter M, Bernstein A, Suedkamp NP, Stoehr A. Brace or no-brace after ACL graft? Four-year results of a prospective clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 May;22(5):1156-62. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2564-2. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
PMID: 23807029BACKGROUNDLaPrade RF, Venderley MB, Dahl KD, Dornan GJ, Turnbull TL. Functional Brace in ACL Surgery: Force Quantification in an In Vivo Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Jul 6;5(7):2325967117714242. doi: 10.1177/2325967117714242. eCollection 2017 Jul.
PMID: 28748195BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Investigators and participants cannot be blinded as to whether or not the brace is worn.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2018
First Posted
September 13, 2018
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
April 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share