Investigation of Nicotine Seeking Behavior in Current Smokers
NSS
Neuropharmacological Investigation of Frontostriatal Network Function and Nicotine Seeking Behavior in Current Smokers
2 other identifiers
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, 21 non-treatment-seeking cigarette smokers were recruited to investigate the effects of acute stress on brain function and nicotine seeking/self-administration behavior.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Jan 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 7, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 4, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2018
CompletedSeptember 13, 2018
September 1, 2018
9 months
September 9, 2018
September 12, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cigarette puff vs. money choice task
Participants could earn (via computer mouse 'clicks') money or cigarette puffs (preferred brand; provided by the study) across 11 independent choice trials. At the start of each trial, subjects selected either money or cigarette puffs on a computer screen. After each selection, subjects could earn one unit of that selection by satisfying the computer 'mouse' click requirement. The click requirement increased with each successive unit earned separately for cigarette puffs and money following a progressive ratio schedule (5, 12, 33, 100, 180, 340, 540, 835, 1220, 1660, and 2275 'mouse' clicks; identical schedule for both options and experimental sessions). Units were $0.25 money and 1 cigarette puff. Earned cigarette puffs were smoked at the end of the task and earned money was applied to the subject's study payment. The task was completed between 2:30pm and 3pm for each session.
30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Letter 2-back task
12 minutes
Cigarette-cued letter N-back task
15 minutes
Other Outcomes (6)
Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale
1 minute; collected five times throughout each experimental session
Brief Questionnaire of Smoking Urges
1 minute; collected five times throughout each experimental session
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
1 minute; collected five times throughout each experimental session
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe placebo compound, Lactose Monohydrate Powder, was encapsulated in generic opaque capsules identical to the capsules used in the acute stress session. During the placebo session, two capsules were self-administered (swallowed) by each subject. At 11:45am, subjects self-administered a capsule containing 54mg of lactose. At 12:15pm, subjects self-administered a capsule containing 10mg of lactose.
Acute Stress
EXPERIMENTALDuring the acute stress experimental session, subjects self-administered two generic opaque capsules. At 11:45am, subjects self-administered a capsule containing 54mg of Yohimbine Hydrochloride powder. At 12:15pm, subjects self-administered a capsule containing 10mg of Hydrocortisone.
Interventions
54mg of yohimbine powder was encapsulated in a generic opaque capsule and swallowed with water.
10mg hydrocortisone was encapsulated in a generic opaque capsule and swallowed with water.
Lactose powder was encapsulated in generic opaque capsules identical to those used during the acute stress session. Lactose doses weighed the same as the acute stress session doses (54mg and 10mg, respectively).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \) Aged between 21-35 years old, 2) current smokers (expired breath carbon monoxide \> 4ppm, self-reported 10+ cigarettes/day, Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence score \> 3, 3) normal seated and resting vital signs (systolic blood pressure 80-160mmHg, diastolic blood pressure 50-90mmHg, and heart rate 50-90 bpm), and 4) normal or corrected-normal vision.
You may not qualify if:
- \) Abnormal electrocardiogram (reviewed by licensed cardiologist), 2) magnetic resonance imaging contraindications (e.g. metal implants), 3) medical/neurological contraindications (e.g., diabetes or head trauma), 4) pregnancy (urine test; females only), 5) positive urine test result for opioids, cocaine metabolites, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, or amphetamines, 6) psychiatric contraindications (subject met criteria for current Axis 1 disorder \[other than nicotine dependence\] as indicated by computerized MINI-6 screen), and 7) self-reported marijuana and/or alcohol use on 15+ days in the past month.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Wayne State Universitylead
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Wayne State University
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Related Publications (4)
Cox LS, Tiffany ST, Christen AG. Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001 Feb;3(1):7-16. doi: 10.1080/14622200020032051.
PMID: 11260806BACKGROUNDSpielberger CD. Assessment of state and trait anxiety: Conceptual and methodological issues. Southern Psychologist 2(4): 6-16, 1985.
BACKGROUNDWatson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
PMID: 3397865BACKGROUNDHughes JR, Hatsukami D. Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Mar;43(3):289-94. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800030107013.
PMID: 3954551BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric A Woodcock, PhD
Wayne State University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Double-blinded study. Subjects, the experimenter, research assistants, and MRI technician did not know if the oral doses were active (acute stress condition) or inert (placebo session).
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctoral Candidate
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2018
First Posted
September 13, 2018
Study Start
January 7, 2016
Primary Completion
October 4, 2016
Study Completion
October 4, 2016
Last Updated
September 13, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share