Regional Anesthesia in Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: 21 Cases Reported to the Limoges University Hospital
TRINEB ONE
1 other identifier
observational
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Trigeminal neuralgia is defined according to the third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) criteria. Chronic pain can have a major impact on the quality of life. First-line treatments are anti-epileptics, and surgical treatments are also possible according to several approaches. Sometimes the pain is resistant to these therapies. In this indication, sensory blocks may have a therapeutic impact but their place is not clear. In France, there are formalized expert recommendations on "loco regional analgesia and chronic pain", from 2013. Several adjuvants to local anesthetics have been studied for acute and chronic pain. CLONIDINE and DEXAMETHASONE are of greatest interest in increasing block duration and reducing opioid consumption. The investigators report the case of 21 patients, treated by a trigeminal block from 2014 to 2018, suffering from a resistant trigeminal neuralgia. After a first consultation, the diagnosis is confirmed, an information is done and an appropriate support is established. The sensory block is performed as an outpatient care. It consists in a peri-neural injection of a mixture of LEVOBUPIVACAINE 5%, CORTIVAZOL 3.75mg / 1.5mL (or BETAMETHASONE 7mg / 1ml) and CLONIDINE (1μg / kg). Standard precautions are respected and patients are monitored in the recovery room after the procedure. The efficacity is evaluated before the exit and a follow-up is done within 15 days. The level of satisfaction expressed by the patients seems to be globally high. The investigators wish to evaluate statistically the impact of the trigeminal blocks, in terms of improvement of the quality of life. This retrospective study, by its procedure, does not change the management of patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Oct 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 9, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 9, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 9, 2019
CompletedSeptember 25, 2019
July 1, 2019
9 months
September 5, 2018
September 24, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of the quality of life from baseline to day 15 after baseline
Percentage of patients with improvement of more than 50% in quality of life, mesured with the 'Medical Outcome Study Short Form 12', from baseline (day 0 = just before the block) to day 15. The questionnaire consists of 12 items questioned weighted and summed to provide physical and mental health scores (PCS and MCS). The two composite scores are computed using the scores on twelve questions that range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better health.
Day 0, Day 15
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change in pain level just before and after the block assessed by a numerical scoring scale
Day 0, Day 15
Neuropathic criteria of pain just before and after the block assessed by DN4
Day 0
Duration of the block
Day 0
Patient overall satisfaction assessed by a Numerical Rating Scale.
Day 0
Impact on analgesics consumption assessed by the dosage of analgesics
Day 0
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Patients with trigeminal neuralgia resistant
a telephone survey will be conducted at 21 patients with trigeminal neuralgia resistant to usual treatments, according to the ICHD-3β criteria treating by one or more trigeminal nerve blocks at the peri operative pain management center of Limoges University Hospital between 2014 and 2018
Interventions
a telephone survey will be conducted at 21 patients with trigeminal neuralgia resistant to usual treatments, according to the ICHD-3β criteria treating by one or more trigeminal nerve blocks at the peri operative pain management center of Limoges University Hospital between 2014 and 2018.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with trigeminal neuralgia resistant to usual treatments, according to the ICHD-3β criteria treating by one or more trigeminal nerve blocks at the peri operative pain management center of Limoges University Hospital between 2014 and 2018.
You may qualify if:
- Major patients with trigeminal neuralgia resistant to usual treatments, according to the ICHD-3β criteria
- treating by one or more trigeminal nerve blocks
- at the peri operative pain management center of Limoges University Hospital
- between 2014 and 2018
You may not qualify if:
- Not consent
- Another type of facial block during the previous year.
- Unavailable medical data
- Deceased patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital
Limoges, 87042, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nathalie NATHAN-DENIZOT, PU-PH
University Hospital, Limoges
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2018
First Posted
September 13, 2018
Study Start
October 9, 2018
Primary Completion
July 9, 2019
Study Completion
July 9, 2019
Last Updated
September 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share