Using Sealing Socket Abutment Technique With Immediate Implant in the Mandibular Molars
Alveolar and Soft Tissue Changes Surrounding Immediate Implant in the Mandibular Molars With and Without Using Sealing Socket Abutment Technique (Randomized Clinical Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
First and second molar locations present major challenges when immediate implant placement is planned due to large extraction sockets that are difficult to seal without mucoperiosteal flap reflection which is less comfortable to patient and also crestal socket morphology not amenable to standard healing abutment which have circular shape and the possibility of high occlusal forces during function with complete provisional crown.Immediate implant placement without sealing socket abutment has several drawbacks, such as collapse of existing soft tissue and also it needs second stage surgery which is less comfortable to patient and chair time consuming for the operator.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 12, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2021
CompletedApril 19, 2024
April 1, 2024
2.5 years
July 18, 2018
April 17, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Soft tissue changes around implant
The PES comprises the following five variables: mesial papilla, distal papilla, curvature of the facial mucosa, level of the facial mucosa, and root convexity/soft tissue, color and texture at the facial aspect of the site. Using a 0-1-2 scoring system, 0 being the lowest, 2 being the highest value, the maximum achievable PES is 14 at time of surgery and at the time of final prothesis. All ten parameters are assessed by direct comparison with the contralateral tooth and a score of 2, 1, or 0 is assigned to all ten parameters. Thus, a maximum total PES of 10 can be reached which represents the optimum condition of the soft tissues of the rehabilitated site compared to the characteristics of the contralateral natural tooth.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
marginal bone loss
18 months
Study Arms (2)
cover screw
ACTIVE COMPARATORextraction of hopeless mandibular molars followed by immediate implants that will be covered using cover screw
sealing socket abutment
EXPERIMENTALextraction of hopeless mandibular molars followed by immediate implants that will be covered using sealing socket abutment
Interventions
Sealing Socket Abutment (SSA) serves as a mechanical barrier to isolate the grafted area, stabilize the clot and contain the graft material, and seal the socket from foreign contaminants and also minimizing the risk of premature loading of the implant during healing. By preparing an SSA fabricated to follow the transmucosal contours of the natural tooth, the grafted area can be sealed and separated from the growth of soft tissue without the use of a membrane or releasing incisions
immediate implant placement in mandibular molar area will be covered with conventional cover screw
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with hopeless molars in the posterior area of the mandible.
- Both sexes.
- No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology
- No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement
You may not qualify if:
- Very thin less than 0.5 mm or absent buccal plate.
- Heavy smokers more than 10 cigarettes per day.
- Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
- Psychiatric problems
- Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site
- Immunodeficiency pathology, bruxism, stress situation (socially or professionally), emotional instability, and unrealistic aesthetic demands.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Cairo Universty
Cairo, 002, Egypt
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
mohamed atef
Cairo University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcomes assessor will be blinded as well as the data analysis
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- clinical research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2018
First Posted
September 12, 2018
Study Start
September 1, 2018
Primary Completion
February 20, 2021
Study Completion
February 20, 2021
Last Updated
April 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04