Treating Pain With Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Trial
T-PACT
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The long-term goal is to define best practices for diminishing the risk of high opioid doses used to treat chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) patients while optimizing pain outcomes and functional levels of activity, emotional functioning, and quality of life. The short-term goal is to assess the feasibility of multiple Clinical and Translational Research Award (CTSA) sites working together to perform and study the effects of a cognitive behavioral therapy intervention in a future randomized controlled trial (RCT) among CNCP patients in rural primary care practices in each CTSA state.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 23, 2020
CompletedMay 24, 2023
May 1, 2023
1.2 years
July 20, 2018
May 23, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary study outcome will be the Success Scale of the Chronic Pain Values Inventory.
Primary study outcome will be the Success Scale of the Chronic Pain Values Inventory (CPVI). Based on an in-progress meta-analysis of unidisciplinary Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for chronic pain, we expect a post-treatment effect size of d = .80 (95% CI: .41 - 1.20). Construct: The CPVI has 12 items that measure, "which values are important to an individual and to assess the degree of success they are having in following their values" and "has supported its use in a contextual analysis of pain and as part of a treatment for chronic pain." Scale ranges: 0 to 5. First sore is mean success rating; second score is mean discrepancy rating. Outcome measures: "Low success in living in accordance to an important value is presumed to entail greater suffering than low success in living in accordance to a value that is relatively unimportant."
One year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The secondary study outcome will be the Pain Interference Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory.
One year
Study Arms (1)
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention consists of eight individual (one-on-one) acceptance and commitment therapy sessions approximately one week apart over a 12-week period.
Interventions
Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a type of psychotherapy, or cognitive behavioral therapy, that aims to help patients focus on the present, accept their situation, and find positive coping skills.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (21-65 years of age).
- Being prescribed chronic opioid medications for the pain.
- Mentally and physically able to participate in data collection (namely, completing an extensive survey at three points in time, attending 8 one-hour therapy sessions, and participating in an interview by the research staff).
You may not qualify if:
- Children under the age of 21 will be excluded from participating because this study is examining ACT in adults with CNCP. Pregnant women will be excluded because their use of opioids presents a special therapeutic circumstance out of the scope of this study. People who are not fluent in English will be excluded because this is a small feasibility study and we do not have the resources to conduct the intervention or collect data in other languages.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of New Mexicolead
- University of Kansas Medical Centercollaborator
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hillcollaborator
- University of Kentuckycollaborator
Study Sites (4)
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Related Publications (4)
Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004 Mar;5(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005.
PMID: 15042521BACKGROUNDKeller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):309-18. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00005.
PMID: 15322437BACKGROUNDCleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.
PMID: 8080219BACKGROUNDMcCracken LM, Yang SY. The role of values in a contextual cognitive-behavioral approach to chronic pain. Pain. 2006 Jul;123(1-2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.021. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
PMID: 16564627BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Rhyne, MD
University of New Mexico
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor & Vice Chair of Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2018
First Posted
September 11, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 23, 2020
Study Completion
March 23, 2020
Last Updated
May 24, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share