NCT03666208

Brief Summary

End stage renal disease is on increasing trend. Haemodialysis is the main dialysis modality among these patients which accounts for the incidence of 81.3% in 2015 based on data from Singapore renal registry. Thus, A functioning dialysis vascular access (either arteriovenous Fistula or graft) is critical to the delivery of life-saving haemodialysis treatment to these patients. The main focus in our study is thrombosed (blocked) AVG as it has higher thrombosis rate and poorer patency rate. Conventionally, to restore the function of the dialysis access, the thrombus (clot) will be lysed with the use of lytic agent; followed by treatment of the underlying stenosis (narrowing) with plain balloon angioplasty (dilatation). However narrowing often recur and multiple repeated angioplasty procedures are needed keep the AVG flowing to prevent clots formation. Recently developed balloons called drug eluting balloons, are coated with medications to prevent the narrowing from recurring after angioplasty. With these drug balloons, the AVG can potentially continue to have good flow for a longer period of time, hence, decreasing the chance of clotting. A newer generation of drug-eluting balloon, called sirolimus coated balloon, are coated with a medicine called sirolimus. It has been successfully used in the treatment of narrowing of vessels in the leg and heart and it were superior than conventional paclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty. We hypothesis that sirolimus coated balloon is superior to conventional plain balloon angioplasty with decreased re-stenosis of target lesion, improved access circuit and target lesion patency, and decreased number of interventions needed to maintain patency.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 10, 2018

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 11, 2018

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 2, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 2, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 10, 2019

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

September 10, 2018

Last Update Submit

September 9, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The patency rate of AVG at 3 months post sirolimus balloon angioplasty by performing surveillance ultrasound of AVG, assessing the thrill of AVG and assessing any dysfunctional vascular assess- related hospital admission.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • The patency rate of AVG at 6 months post sirolimus balloon angioplasty by performing surveillance ultrasound of AVG, assessing the thrill of AVG and assessing any dysfunctional vascular assess- related hospital admission.

    6 months

  • The number of intervention(s) needed to maintain patency of AVG.

    6 months

  • The cost effective of using sirolimus coated balloon in the management of thrombosed AVG by reviewing hospital bills related to dysfunctional dialysis access.

    6 months

Study Arms (1)

Thrombosed Arteriovenous Graft

EXPERIMENTAL

Single arm pilot study to investigate effect of sirolimus coated balloon in thrombosed arteriovenous graft

Device: Sirolimus Coated Balloon

Interventions

Sirolimus has been used in organ transplantation as well as coronary stent due to its antiproliferative properties. It has been proven to has better outcome in animal studies compared to paclitaxel, which is about 22% in the sirolimus group versus 75% re-stenosis rate in paclitaxel group. Sirolimus is coated on the surface of the angioplasty balloon and is transferred to the vessel wall when balloon is inflated and in contact with the vessel wall. The following table compare sirolimus to paclitaxel. In which sirolimus works by cytostatic mechanism with a ten thousand fold of safety margin. And sirolimus's anti-restenosis effect is optimal with the benefit of lower level of competition and lesser tissue absorption and elution.

Also known as: Drug eluting device
Thrombosed Arteriovenous Graft

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 21-85 years
  • Thrombosed AVG in the arm
  • Successful thrombolysis of the thrombosed AVG, defined as the re-established of flow on Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) and restoration of thrill in the AVG on clinical examination

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient unable to provide informed consent
  • Previous bare metal stent or stent-graft placement within the dialysis access
  • Presence of central vein stenosis
  • Sepsis or active infection
  • Recent intracranial bleed or gastrointestinal bleed within the past 12 months
  • Allergy to iodinated contrast media, anti-platelet drugs, heparin or paclitaxel
  • Pregnancy
  • Life expectancy \< 12 months based on physician's estimate (active malignancy)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Singapore General Hospital Renal Department

Singapore, 169608, Singapore

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Roy-Chaudhury P, Sukhatme VP, Cheung AK. Hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction: a cellular and molecular viewpoint. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Apr;17(4):1112-27. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005050615.

    PMID: 16565259BACKGROUND
  • Lee T, Roy-Chaudhury P. Advances and new frontiers in the pathophysiology of venous neointimal hyperplasia and dialysis access stenosis. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2009 Sep;16(5):329-38. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2009.06.009.

    PMID: 19695501BACKGROUND
  • Pantelias K, Grapsa E. Vascular access today. World J Nephrol. 2012 Jun 6;1(3):69-78. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v1.i3.69.

  • Collins AJ, Foley RN, Gilbertson DT, Chen SC. United States Renal Data System public health surveillance of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2015 Jun;5(1):2-7. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2015.2.

  • Rajan DK, Bunston S, Misra S, Pinto R, Lok CE. Dysfunctional autogenous hemodialysis fistulas: outcomes after angioplasty--are there clinical predictors of patency? Radiology. 2004 Aug;232(2):508-15. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2322030714.

  • Manninen HI, Kaukanen ET, Ikaheimo R, Karhapaa P, Lahtinen T, Matsi P, Lampainen E. Brachial arterial access: endovascular treatment of failing Brescia-Cimino hemodialysis fistulas--initial success and long-term results. Radiology. 2001 Mar;218(3):711-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr38711.

  • Heye S, Maleux G, Vaninbroukx J, Claes K, Kuypers D, Oyen R. Factors influencing technical success and outcome of percutaneous balloon angioplasty in de novo native hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Sep;81(9):2298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Sep 28.

  • Haskal ZJ, Trerotola S, Dolmatch B, Schuman E, Altman S, Mietling S, Berman S, McLennan G, Trimmer C, Ross J, Vesely T. Stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for failing dialysis-access grafts. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 11;362(6):494-503. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902045.

  • Shemesh D, Goldin I, Zaghal I, Berlowitz D, Raveh D, Olsha O. Angioplasty with stent graft versus bare stent for recurrent cephalic arch stenosis in autogenous arteriovenous access for hemodialysis: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6):1524-31, 1531.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.071. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

  • Katsanos K, Karnabatidis D, Kitrou P, Spiliopoulos S, Christeas N, Siablis D. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty vs. plain balloon dilation for the treatment of failing dialysis access: 6-month interim results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Apr;19(2):263-72. doi: 10.1583/11-3690.1.

  • Andreini D, Trabattoni D. Is the Sirolimus encapsulated balloon a reliable tool for treating the in-stent restenosis?-insights from the SABRE trial. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Feb;10(2):634-637. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.05. No abstract available.

  • Verheye S, Vrolix M, Kumsars I, Erglis A, Sondore D, Agostoni P, Cornelis K, Janssens L, Maeng M, Slagboom T, Amoroso G, Jensen LO, Granada JF, Stella P. The SABRE Trial (Sirolimus Angioplasty Balloon for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis): Angiographic Results and 1-Year Clinical Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 23;10(20):2029-2037. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

  • Tan RY, Tan CW, Pang SC, Foo MWY, Tang TY, Gogna A, Chong TT, Tan CS. Study protocol of a pilot study on sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty in salvaging clotted arteriovenous graft. CVIR Endovasc. 2020 Jul 5;3(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s42155-020-00123-4.

Study Officials

  • Chieh Suai Tan, Doctor

    Singapore General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a phase 2, pilot clinical trial to investigate the effect of SCB on thrombosed AVG. Specifically, we are focusing on AVG as they have a higher thrombosis rate than AVF and the patency rate even after successful thrombolysis is much lower than AVF. As neointimal hyperplasia is the predominant cause for stenosis at the graft vein junction, treatment with Sirolimus will intuitively delay the recurrence of neo-intimal hyperplasia and result in better patency of the AVG after successful thrombolysis. Patients with ESRD presenting with a thrombosed AVG between June 2018 and December 2018 will be screened for suitability. Eligible patients of at least 21 years of age will be offered participation. The potential benefits and risks of SCB will be explained and informed consent obtained from participants. A total of 20 patients will be recruited for the trial and they will be followed up for 6 months after the interventions.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2018

First Posted

September 11, 2018

Study Start

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion

September 2, 2019

Study Completion

September 2, 2019

Last Updated

September 10, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-09

Locations