Comparing Outpatient to Inpatient Cervical Ripening Using Dilapan-S®
HOMECARE
Induction of Labor in Women With Unfavorable Cervix: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Outpatient to Inpatient Cervical Ripening Using Dilapan-S® (HOMECARE)
1 other identifier
interventional
338
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The target population for our study is women who present for induction of labor. If there is a decision by the obstetrical team to place a mechanical dilator for cervical ripening, the obstetrical team will notify the research staff so that the patient may be screened for the study. If the subject is eligible for the trial, written informed consent will be obtained by person-to-person contact. The PI, study coordinator, or a collaborator will be responsible for the informed consent procedure. After informed consent is obtained and Dilapan-S is placed, the patient will be randomized to the Outpatient or the Inpatient group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 7, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 5, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 5, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 27, 2023
CompletedJuly 27, 2023
July 1, 2023
3 years
August 30, 2018
March 31, 2023
July 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Hospital Stay Longer Than 48 Hours
Rate of hospital stay longer than 48 hours (from admission to discharge)
72 hours or discharge home time, whichever occurs first
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Number of Participants With Vaginal Deliveries 2-4 Days
2-4 days
Number of Participants With Vaginal Deliveries - 24 Hours
24 hours
Time From Hospital Admission to Active Stage of Labor
1-2 days
Change in Bishop Score From Insertion of Device to Extraction
12 hours
Number of Participants With Operative Vaginal Delivery
1-4 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Outpatient Dilapan-S
EXPERIMENTALAfter Dilapan-S® placement, subjects will be given the option to either return home or to stay in a hotel if transportation is an issue. Subjects will also be instructed to return to L\&D unit 12 hours after insertion, or earlier if any excessive bleeding, rupture of membranes, pain or other concerns (contractions, decreased fetal movement) develop before the 12 hours
Inpatient Dilapan-S
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter Dilapan-S® placement, subjects will be admitted to L\&D unit and standard clinical protocol will be initiated for cervical ripening and labor induction. During the period of 12 hours of cervical ripening subject is to remain "nothing per os" (NPO), "nothing per vagina" and undergo continuous fetal heart rate monitoring. No other interventions are to occur during this period of 12 hours, unless clinically indicated.
Interventions
After Dilapan-S placement, subjects will be given the option to either return home or to stay in a hotel if transportation is an issue. Subjects will also be instructed to return to L\&D unit 12 hours after insertion, or earlier if any excessive bleeding, rupture of membranes, pain or other concerns (contractions, decreased fetal movement) develop before the 12 hours. After the designated 12 hours' time or earlier, if indicated, subjects are to return and to be admitted to L\&D unit for standard protocol of labor induction.
After Dilapan-S placement, subjects will be admitted to L\&D unit and standard clinical protocol will be initiated for cervical ripening and labor induction. During the period of 12 hours of cervical ripening subject is to remain "nothing per os" (NPO), "nothing per vagina" and undergo continuous fetal heart rate monitoring. No other interventions are to occur during this period of 12 hours, unless clinically indicated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant woman whose plan of care is induction of labor
- Maternal age between 18 and 45 years
- Understanding and capable to sign informed consent
- Singleton pregnancy
- Gestational age ≥ 37 0/7 weeks (based on a sure last menstrual period or a first trimester dating ultrasound)
- Live fetus in cephalic presentation
- Intact membranes
- Pelvic exam (sterile vaginal exam) of less than or equal to 3cm and at most 60% effaced
You may not qualify if:
- Active labor
- Active genital herpes
- Chorioamnionitis
- Transfundal uterine or cervical surgery
- Previous cesarean delivery
- Non-reassuring fetal status
- Need for continuous maternal or fetal monitoring during ripening
- Contraindication for vaginal delivery
- Active vaginal bleeding
- Abnormal placental location or adherence (placenta previa or unresolved low lying placenta)
- Estimated fetal weight \> 5000 g (non diabetic) or \> 4500 g (diabetic)
- Intrauterine growth restriction (estimated fetal weight \<10 percentile)
- Oligohydramnios (amniotic fluid index \< 5cm or deep vertical pocket of \< 2 cm)
- Fetal anomaly
- Need for inpatient care (e.g. hypertension, insulin-dependent diabetes)
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
UTMB Galveston
Galveston, Texas, 77555, United States
Related Publications (12)
Thiery M, De Boever J, Merchiers E, Martens G. Hormones and cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 May;160(5 Pt 1):1251-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90207-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 2524974BACKGROUNDGrobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.
PMID: 30089070BACKGROUNDWilkinson C, Adelson P, Turnbull D. A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 May 28;15:126. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0550-z.
PMID: 26018581BACKGROUNDWilkinson C, Bryce R, Adelson P, Turnbull D. A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E(2) (OPRA study). BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(1):94-104. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12846. Epub 2014 May 14.
PMID: 24824157BACKGROUNDHenry A, Madan A, Reid R, Tracy SK, Austin K, Welsh A, Challis D. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jan 29;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-25.
PMID: 23356673BACKGROUNDKruit H, Heikinheimo O, Ulander VM, Aitokallio-Tallberg A, Nupponen I, Paavonen J, Rahkonen L. Foley catheter induction of labor as an outpatient procedure. J Perinatol. 2016 Aug;36(8):618-22. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.62. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
PMID: 27078202BACKGROUNDSciscione AC, Muench M, Pollock M, Jenkins TM, Tildon-Burton J, Colmorgen GH. Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):751-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01579-4.
PMID: 11704164BACKGROUNDDiederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15047. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
PMID: 29211328BACKGROUNDGupta J, Chodankar R, Baev O, Bahlmann F, Brega E, Gala A, Hellmeyer L, Hruban L, Maier J, Mehta P, Murthy A, Ritter M, Saad A, Shmakov R, Suneja A, Zahumensky J, Gdovinova D. Synthetic osmotic dilators in the induction of labour-An international multicentre observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Oct;229:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
PMID: 30107363BACKGROUNDKuper SG, Jauk VC, George DM, Edwards RK, Szychowski JM, Mazzoni SE, Wang MJ, Files P, Tita AT, Subramaniam A, Harper LM. Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Parous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):94-101. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002678.
PMID: 29889751BACKGROUNDSaad AF, Gavara R, Senguttuvan RN, Goncharov AD, Berry M, Eid J, Goldman B, Nutter A, Moutos CP, Wang AM, Saade GR. Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct 1;140(4):584-590. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004942. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
PMID: 36083097DERIVEDAlfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Nogueira Pileggi V, Plachcinski R, Osoti AO, Finucane EM. Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 27;8(8):CD007372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007372.pub4.
PMID: 32852803DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Antonio Saad Director of Clinical Research Division
- Organization
- UTMB Galveston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Antonio Saad, MD
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 30, 2018
First Posted
September 11, 2018
Study Start
November 7, 2018
Primary Completion
November 5, 2021
Study Completion
November 5, 2021
Last Updated
July 27, 2023
Results First Posted
July 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07