MINDD 3: Prediabetes and Delay Discounting
MINDD
Delay Discounting as a Target for Self-Regulation in Prediabetes
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The proposed research will translate research on delay discounting to the prevention of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in persons with prediabetes. In this study, the investigators will verify target engagement (DD) by examining if EFT improves DD under conditions shown to increase discounting of the future. Prediabetics will be randomized to receive EFT/ERT in a factorial design when experiencing simulated poverty/neutral conditions, respectively. The effects will be measured on DD. The investigators predict that poverty conditions will increase discounting of the future for ERT subjects, but those receiving EFT will show levels of DD similar to levels observed for participants in the wealth condition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 4, 2022
CompletedFebruary 21, 2023
February 1, 2023
5 months
April 4, 2018
April 20, 2022
February 16, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Delay Discounting
Delay Discounting will be measured using monetary Delay Discounting tasks with $100 as the delayed reward. Delay discounting is assessed using Area Under the Curve (AUC), or time\*indifference point/delay. AUC for delay discounting included time (x-axis) and indifference point (y-axis), or the amount of money at which the immediate and delayed options are approximately equal. Indifference points are a percentage of the max amount (range 0 - 100). AUC adds the calculated areas for each timepoint from the previous timepoint. Ordinal AUC was used as the measure. Ordinal AUC normalizes the horizontal axis time points to have equal distances between them. AUC ranges from 0 (most impulsive, did not choose delay) to 100 (least impulsive, always chose delay). This is the difference in delay discounting between session 2 and session 1. Larger numbers indicate a decrease in discounting, or less impulsive, while smaller/negative numbers indicate an increase in discounting, or more impulsive.
Delay Discounting will be measured at baseline (session 1) and after receiving EFT/ERT and Scarcity/Narrative (within about 2 weeks)
Reinforcing Value of Food
Reinforcing value of food was measured using the relative reinforcing efficacy questionnaire in which participants are asked how many portions of food they would purchase at various prices. Intensity is the number of portions they would purchase and consume when the price is $0.
Session 2
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Working Memory Span
Working Memory will be measured at baseline (session 1) and after receiving EFT/ERT Scarcity/Neutral intervention (up to 2 weeks post-baseline)
Study Arms (4)
Episodic Future Thinking (EFT) & Neutral Narrative
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will complete an episodic thinking task to generate episodic cues where they will list and describe events for different time periods.The episodic component of the thinking task will occur while the participants are asked to describe what they are imagining about each event (e.g., vacations, weddings, parties, and so forth). EFT participants will list positive future events they are looking forward to and list events that could happen at different general future time points (e.g., 1 month, 2-6 months, 7-12 months). Participants will also be asked to think about a neutral narrative that describes a situation in which changes to their income are neutral or minimal
Episodic Recent Thinking (ERT) & Neutral Narrative
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will complete an episodic recent thinking task to generate episodic cues where they will list and describe events for different time periods. The episodic component of the thinking task will occur while the participants are asked to describe what they are imagining about each event. ERT participants will list positive recent events they enjoyed and list events that happened recently (e.g. 1 - 7 days ago). Participants will also be asked to think about a neutral narrative that describes a situation in which changes to their income are neutral or minimal (e.g. department job transfer).
Episodic Future Thinking (EFT) & Scarcity Narrative
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will complete an episodic thinking task to generate episodic cues where they will list and describe events for different time periods.The episodic component of the thinking task will occur while the participants are asked to describe what they are imagining about each event (e.g., vacations, weddings, parties, and so forth). EFT participants will list positive future events they are looking forward to and list events that could happen at different general future time points (e.g., 1 month, 2-6 months, 7-12 months). Participants will also be asked to think about a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset by describing a situation in which changes to their income are negative (e.g. loss of job).
Episodic Recent Thinking (ERT) & Scarcity Narrative
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will complete an episodic recent thinking task to generate episodic cues where they will list and describe events for different time periods. The episodic component of the thinking task will occur while the participants are asked to describe what they are imagining about each event. ERT participants will list positive recent events they enjoyed and list events that happened recently (e.g. 1 - 7 days ago). Participants will also be asked to think about a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset by describing a situation in which changes to their income are negative (e.g. loss of job).
Interventions
Participants will be instructed to use their episodic future cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.
Participants will be instructed to use their episodic recent cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.
Participants will read a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset, in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have lost their job and have no current secondary income.
Participants will read a narrative in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have been transferred between departmental jobs, with little change in salary/commute.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Prediabetes: Participants must have a diagnosis of prediabetes within the last 2 years or meet criteria for prediabetes. The American Diabetes Association guidelines defines prediabetes as Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) 100-125 mg/dl, 2h glucose 140-199 mg/dl after Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT), or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) approximately 5.7-6.4%.
- Comorbidities: Participants must have a history of comorbid diagnosis such as hypertension and/or hyperlipidemia to participate in the behavioral portion of this study. Hypertension is defined as blood pressure greater than 140/90 on two separate occasions at least one week apart, or medical management for hypertension (i.e. medications including Lisinopril and Diovan). Dyslipidemia is defined by LDL greater than 130 mg/dl, or non-fasting non HDL cholesterol ≥160mg/dL or medical management for dyslipidemia (medications including Niacin, Lovastatin).
You may not qualify if:
- Type 2 Diabetes: Individuals will be excluded if they have Type 2 Diabetes.
- Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant or lactating will be excluded from participation.
- Conditions that affect adherence: Participants should not have a condition that would limit participation which include medical conditions that would affect individuals' ability to use the computer for prolonged period of time; leave the individual unable to ambulate; or current diagnoses of an eating disorder (anorexia, bulimia,), unmanaged psychiatric disorder (depression, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia), or an intellectual impairment that would impact study adherence.
- Abnormal glucose related to medications: Participants should not be taking medications that would limit participation and cause abnormal glucose levels (e.g. atypical antipsychotic medications or glucocorticoids) including diabetic drugs such as Metformin.
- Unwilling or unable to eat study food: Participants who are unwilling or not able to eat the study food (a PowerBar) will not be able to take part in this study.
- Prior participation in similar studies: Individuals who have recently participated in a laboratory study using similar methods may also be excluded.
- Do not meet discounting criteria: Individuals who do not meet discounting criteria (e.g. nonsystematic discounting) on a delay discounting task may be excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University at Buffalo, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Behavioral Medicine
Buffalo, New York, 14214, United States
Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Virginia Tech Carilion
Roanoke, Virginia, 24016, United States
Related Publications (2)
Stein JS, Craft WH, Paluch RA, Gatchalian KM, Greenawald MH, Quattrin T, Mastrandrea LD, Epstein LH, Bickel WK. Bleak present, bright future: II. Combined effects of episodic future thinking and scarcity on delay discounting in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes. J Behav Med. 2021 Apr;44(2):222-230. doi: 10.1007/s10865-020-00178-7. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
PMID: 32989616DERIVEDBickel WK, Stein JS, Paluch RA, Mellis AM, Athamneh LN, Quattrin T, Greenawald MH, Bree KA, Gatchalian KM, Mastrandrea LD, Epstein LH. Does Episodic Future Thinking Repair Immediacy Bias at Home and in the Laboratory in Patients With Prediabetes? Psychosom Med. 2020 Sep;82(7):699-707. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000841.
PMID: 32868537DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Leonard H. Epstein
- Organization
- University at Buffalo
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leonard H Epstein
SUNY University at Buffalo
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Warren K Bickel
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2018
First Posted
September 10, 2018
Study Start
February 12, 2018
Primary Completion
June 30, 2018
Study Completion
June 30, 2018
Last Updated
February 21, 2023
Results First Posted
August 4, 2022
Record last verified: 2023-02