NCT03664726

Brief Summary

The proposed research will translate research on delay discounting to the prevention of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in persons with prediabetes. In this study, the investigators will verify target engagement (DD) by examining if EFT improves DD under conditions shown to increase discounting of the future. Prediabetics will be randomized to receive EFT/ERT in a factorial design when experiencing simulated poverty/neutral conditions, respectively. The effects will be measured on DD. The investigators predict that poverty conditions will increase discounting of the future for ERT subjects, but those receiving EFT will show levels of DD similar to levels observed for participants in the wealth condition.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
78

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 12, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 4, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 10, 2018

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 4, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 21, 2023

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

April 4, 2018

Results QC Date

April 20, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 16, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Delay Discounting, Episodic Future Thinking

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Delay Discounting

    Delay Discounting will be measured using monetary Delay Discounting tasks with $100 as the delayed reward. Delay discounting is assessed using Area Under the Curve (AUC), or time\*indifference point/delay. AUC for delay discounting included time (x-axis) and indifference point (y-axis), or the amount of money at which the immediate and delayed options are approximately equal. Indifference points are a percentage of the max amount (range 0 - 100). AUC adds the calculated areas for each timepoint from the previous timepoint. Ordinal AUC was used as the measure. Ordinal AUC normalizes the horizontal axis time points to have equal distances between them. AUC ranges from 0 (most impulsive, did not choose delay) to 100 (least impulsive, always chose delay). This is the difference in delay discounting between session 2 and session 1. Larger numbers indicate a decrease in discounting, or less impulsive, while smaller/negative numbers indicate an increase in discounting, or more impulsive.

    Delay Discounting will be measured at baseline (session 1) and after receiving EFT/ERT and Scarcity/Narrative (within about 2 weeks)

  • Reinforcing Value of Food

    Reinforcing value of food was measured using the relative reinforcing efficacy questionnaire in which participants are asked how many portions of food they would purchase at various prices. Intensity is the number of portions they would purchase and consume when the price is $0.

    Session 2

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Working Memory Span

    Working Memory will be measured at baseline (session 1) and after receiving EFT/ERT Scarcity/Neutral intervention (up to 2 weeks post-baseline)

Study Arms (4)

Episodic Future Thinking (EFT) & Neutral Narrative

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will complete an episodic thinking task to generate episodic cues where they will list and describe events for different time periods.The episodic component of the thinking task will occur while the participants are asked to describe what they are imagining about each event (e.g., vacations, weddings, parties, and so forth). EFT participants will list positive future events they are looking forward to and list events that could happen at different general future time points (e.g., 1 month, 2-6 months, 7-12 months). Participants will also be asked to think about a neutral narrative that describes a situation in which changes to their income are neutral or minimal

Behavioral: Episodic Future ThinkingBehavioral: Neutral Narrative

Episodic Recent Thinking (ERT) & Neutral Narrative

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will complete an episodic recent thinking task to generate episodic cues where they will list and describe events for different time periods. The episodic component of the thinking task will occur while the participants are asked to describe what they are imagining about each event. ERT participants will list positive recent events they enjoyed and list events that happened recently (e.g. 1 - 7 days ago). Participants will also be asked to think about a neutral narrative that describes a situation in which changes to their income are neutral or minimal (e.g. department job transfer).

Behavioral: Episodic Recent ThinkingBehavioral: Neutral Narrative

Episodic Future Thinking (EFT) & Scarcity Narrative

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will complete an episodic thinking task to generate episodic cues where they will list and describe events for different time periods.The episodic component of the thinking task will occur while the participants are asked to describe what they are imagining about each event (e.g., vacations, weddings, parties, and so forth). EFT participants will list positive future events they are looking forward to and list events that could happen at different general future time points (e.g., 1 month, 2-6 months, 7-12 months). Participants will also be asked to think about a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset by describing a situation in which changes to their income are negative (e.g. loss of job).

Behavioral: Episodic Future ThinkingBehavioral: Scarcity Narrative

Episodic Recent Thinking (ERT) & Scarcity Narrative

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will complete an episodic recent thinking task to generate episodic cues where they will list and describe events for different time periods. The episodic component of the thinking task will occur while the participants are asked to describe what they are imagining about each event. ERT participants will list positive recent events they enjoyed and list events that happened recently (e.g. 1 - 7 days ago). Participants will also be asked to think about a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset by describing a situation in which changes to their income are negative (e.g. loss of job).

Behavioral: Episodic Recent ThinkingBehavioral: Scarcity Narrative

Interventions

Participants will be instructed to use their episodic future cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.

Also known as: EFT
Episodic Future Thinking (EFT) & Neutral NarrativeEpisodic Future Thinking (EFT) & Scarcity Narrative

Participants will be instructed to use their episodic recent cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.

Also known as: ERT
Episodic Recent Thinking (ERT) & Neutral NarrativeEpisodic Recent Thinking (ERT) & Scarcity Narrative

Participants will read a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset, in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have lost their job and have no current secondary income.

Also known as: Scarcity
Episodic Future Thinking (EFT) & Scarcity NarrativeEpisodic Recent Thinking (ERT) & Scarcity Narrative

Participants will read a narrative in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have been transferred between departmental jobs, with little change in salary/commute.

Also known as: Neutral
Episodic Future Thinking (EFT) & Neutral NarrativeEpisodic Recent Thinking (ERT) & Neutral Narrative

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Prediabetes: Participants must have a diagnosis of prediabetes within the last 2 years or meet criteria for prediabetes. The American Diabetes Association guidelines defines prediabetes as Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) 100-125 mg/dl, 2h glucose 140-199 mg/dl after Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT), or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) approximately 5.7-6.4%.
  • Comorbidities: Participants must have a history of comorbid diagnosis such as hypertension and/or hyperlipidemia to participate in the behavioral portion of this study. Hypertension is defined as blood pressure greater than 140/90 on two separate occasions at least one week apart, or medical management for hypertension (i.e. medications including Lisinopril and Diovan). Dyslipidemia is defined by LDL greater than 130 mg/dl, or non-fasting non HDL cholesterol ≥160mg/dL or medical management for dyslipidemia (medications including Niacin, Lovastatin).

You may not qualify if:

  • Type 2 Diabetes: Individuals will be excluded if they have Type 2 Diabetes.
  • Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant or lactating will be excluded from participation.
  • Conditions that affect adherence: Participants should not have a condition that would limit participation which include medical conditions that would affect individuals' ability to use the computer for prolonged period of time; leave the individual unable to ambulate; or current diagnoses of an eating disorder (anorexia, bulimia,), unmanaged psychiatric disorder (depression, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia), or an intellectual impairment that would impact study adherence.
  • Abnormal glucose related to medications: Participants should not be taking medications that would limit participation and cause abnormal glucose levels (e.g. atypical antipsychotic medications or glucocorticoids) including diabetic drugs such as Metformin.
  • Unwilling or unable to eat study food: Participants who are unwilling or not able to eat the study food (a PowerBar) will not be able to take part in this study.
  • Prior participation in similar studies: Individuals who have recently participated in a laboratory study using similar methods may also be excluded.
  • Do not meet discounting criteria: Individuals who do not meet discounting criteria (e.g. nonsystematic discounting) on a delay discounting task may be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

University at Buffalo, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Behavioral Medicine

Buffalo, New York, 14214, United States

Location

Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Virginia Tech Carilion

Roanoke, Virginia, 24016, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Stein JS, Craft WH, Paluch RA, Gatchalian KM, Greenawald MH, Quattrin T, Mastrandrea LD, Epstein LH, Bickel WK. Bleak present, bright future: II. Combined effects of episodic future thinking and scarcity on delay discounting in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes. J Behav Med. 2021 Apr;44(2):222-230. doi: 10.1007/s10865-020-00178-7. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

  • Bickel WK, Stein JS, Paluch RA, Mellis AM, Athamneh LN, Quattrin T, Greenawald MH, Bree KA, Gatchalian KM, Mastrandrea LD, Epstein LH. Does Episodic Future Thinking Repair Immediacy Bias at Home and in the Laboratory in Patients With Prediabetes? Psychosom Med. 2020 Sep;82(7):699-707. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000841.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prediabetic State

Interventions

Water Insecurity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Drinking WaterBeveragesDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological PhenomenaFood and Beverages

Results Point of Contact

Title
Leonard H. Epstein
Organization
University at Buffalo

Study Officials

  • Leonard H Epstein

    SUNY University at Buffalo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Warren K Bickel

    Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: Participants will be assigned to complete an episodic future or recent thinking task and asked to describe positive events for different time periods.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2018

First Posted

September 10, 2018

Study Start

February 12, 2018

Primary Completion

June 30, 2018

Study Completion

June 30, 2018

Last Updated

February 21, 2023

Results First Posted

August 4, 2022

Record last verified: 2023-02

Locations