Stress and Feeding (SAFE): A Pilot Intervention for Mothers and Their Preterm Infants
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A majority of mothers experience high stress levels and associated symptoms of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep disruption during the NICU hospitalization and continuing after hospital discharge. Given preterm infant feeding is one of the most stressful things the new mother will face and given the harmful nature of stress on maternal and infant health, it is important an intervention focuses on both of these concerns: infant feeding and maternal stress. Therefore, the purpose of this research study is two-fold. First, the investigators will examine how practical and acceptable it is for mothers of preterm infants to participate in Stress And FEeding (SAFE) intervention and collect biological stress measures from mothers and their preterm infant's saliva (spit). The intervention is designed to reduce stress and improve maternal feeding interaction. The second purpose of this study is to examine changes before and after using the intervention on mother and infant outcomes over 16-weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 14, 2020
CompletedJune 6, 2023
June 1, 2023
1.6 years
August 24, 2018
June 2, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Ease of recruitment of participants
Number of mother-infant dyads recruited, with a goal of 15
12-months after study opens to enrollment
Track non-participation
Track reasons for non-participation via self-report
16-weeks after start of intervention
Adherence
Adherence will be assessed by tracking the number of times the interventions are used
16-weeks after start of intervention
Data collection completeness
Percent of participants with complete data collection at end of study, with a goal of \>75% of patients
16-weeks after start of intervention
Appraisal of SAFE's degree of inconvenience
The participants appraisal of inconvenience will be measured through a semi-structured interview and will be described qualitatively
16-weeks after start of intervention
Satisfaction with intervention
The participants satisfaction with the intervention will be measured using a 26-item Likert scale where 1 represents being not at all satisfied to 5 being very much satisfied.
16-weeks after start of intervention
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in maternal stress
Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline
Changes in mother biological stress
Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline
Changes in infant biological stress
Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline
Changes in mother-infant feeding behaviors
Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline
Other Outcomes (1)
Practicability of collecting cortisol
16-weeks after start of intervention
Study Arms (1)
Stress and Feeding (SAFE)
EXPERIMENTALThe SAFE intervention is grounded in a general theory of guided participation (GP) that posits learning will be facilitated by an emotionally regulated state of the mother. Efforts to help mothers manage stress will better position them to learn and attend to feeding their infants. GP links the two components: stress management (SM) and guided feeding (GF). SM provides skills to manage perceived stress and regulate emotion. GF provides education with skill building to help mothers become more sensitive and responsive to their infant. SAFE is delivered through a secure, password-protected responsive website with practice opportunities.
Interventions
The Stress Management component of the intervention acknowledges the mind-body connection between stress and adverse outcomes and consists of four web-based modules based on Lazarus and Folkman's Transactional Model of Stress and Coping designed to improve health outcomes. The Guided Feeding component of the intervention is based on the synactive theory of development. The synactive theory of development provides insight in to reading the physiological and behavioral cues of infants born preterm and involves weekly viewing of video clips of adaptive and maladaptive feeding behaviors of mothers and infants, practice opportunities, and follow-up phone calls.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English-speaking and reading
- Given birth to preterm infant \< 35-weeks gestation
- Has access to internet
- Lives within 50-mile radius of hospital
- Born less than 35 week gestation
- No congenital anomalies that could interfere with feeding (e.g., diaphragmatic hernia, cleft lip/palate tracheoesophageal fistula, and cardiac anomalies
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic neuroendocrine or immunologic condition
- Currently using guided imagery or other mind-body techniques such as meditation
- Psychiatric disorder involving a history of dissociative disorders, borderline personalities, and psychotic pathology
- Grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage
- Surgical necrotizing enterocolitis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
Related Publications (10)
Als, H. (1986). A synactive model of neonatal behavioral organization: framework for the assessment of neurobehavioral development in the premature infant and for support of infants and parents in the neonatal intensive care environment. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 6(2-3), 3-53. http://doi.org/10.1080/J006v06n03_02
BACKGROUNDAls H, Gilkerson L. The role of relationship-based developmentally supportive newborn intensive care in strengthening outcome of preterm infants. Semin Perinatol. 1997 Jun;21(3):178-89. doi: 10.1016/s0146-0005(97)80062-6.
PMID: 9205974BACKGROUNDLazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
BACKGROUNDPridham KF. Guided participation and development of care-giving competencies for families of low birth-weight infants. J Adv Nurs. 1998 Nov;28(5):948-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00814.x.
PMID: 9840866BACKGROUNDPridham K, Brown R, Clark R, Limbo RK, Schroeder M, Henriques J, Bohne E. Effect of guided participation on feeding competencies of mothers and their premature infants. Res Nurs Health. 2005 Jun;28(3):252-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20073.
PMID: 15884024BACKGROUNDJung JW. Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context (barbara rogoff). Korean J Med Educ. 2009 Jun;21(2):197-8. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2009.21.2.197. Epub 2009 Jun 30. No abstract available.
PMID: 25813118BACKGROUNDRogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
BACKGROUNDSchroeder M, Pridham K. Development of relationship competencies through guided participation for mothers of preterm infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;35(3):358-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00049.x.
PMID: 16700685BACKGROUNDWethington, E., Glanz, K., & Schwartz, M. (2015). Stress, coping and health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health Behavior: theory, Research & Practice (5th ed., pp. 223-242). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
BACKGROUNDHsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
PMID: 16204405BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lisa F Brown, PhD, RN
Virginia Commonwealth University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2018
First Posted
September 10, 2018
Study Start
May 15, 2019
Primary Completion
December 14, 2020
Study Completion
December 14, 2020
Last Updated
June 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share IPD with other researchers.