NCT03664154

Brief Summary

A majority of mothers experience high stress levels and associated symptoms of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep disruption during the NICU hospitalization and continuing after hospital discharge. Given preterm infant feeding is one of the most stressful things the new mother will face and given the harmful nature of stress on maternal and infant health, it is important an intervention focuses on both of these concerns: infant feeding and maternal stress. Therefore, the purpose of this research study is two-fold. First, the investigators will examine how practical and acceptable it is for mothers of preterm infants to participate in Stress And FEeding (SAFE) intervention and collect biological stress measures from mothers and their preterm infant's saliva (spit). The intervention is designed to reduce stress and improve maternal feeding interaction. The second purpose of this study is to examine changes before and after using the intervention on mother and infant outcomes over 16-weeks.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 24, 2018

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 10, 2018

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2019

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 14, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 14, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 6, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

August 24, 2018

Last Update Submit

June 2, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Ease of recruitment of participants

    Number of mother-infant dyads recruited, with a goal of 15

    12-months after study opens to enrollment

  • Track non-participation

    Track reasons for non-participation via self-report

    16-weeks after start of intervention

  • Adherence

    Adherence will be assessed by tracking the number of times the interventions are used

    16-weeks after start of intervention

  • Data collection completeness

    Percent of participants with complete data collection at end of study, with a goal of \>75% of patients

    16-weeks after start of intervention

  • Appraisal of SAFE's degree of inconvenience

    The participants appraisal of inconvenience will be measured through a semi-structured interview and will be described qualitatively

    16-weeks after start of intervention

  • Satisfaction with intervention

    The participants satisfaction with the intervention will be measured using a 26-item Likert scale where 1 represents being not at all satisfied to 5 being very much satisfied.

    16-weeks after start of intervention

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in maternal stress

    Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline

  • Changes in mother biological stress

    Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline

  • Changes in infant biological stress

    Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline

  • Changes in mother-infant feeding behaviors

    Baseline to 16-weeks post-baseline

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Practicability of collecting cortisol

    16-weeks after start of intervention

Study Arms (1)

Stress and Feeding (SAFE)

EXPERIMENTAL

The SAFE intervention is grounded in a general theory of guided participation (GP) that posits learning will be facilitated by an emotionally regulated state of the mother. Efforts to help mothers manage stress will better position them to learn and attend to feeding their infants. GP links the two components: stress management (SM) and guided feeding (GF). SM provides skills to manage perceived stress and regulate emotion. GF provides education with skill building to help mothers become more sensitive and responsive to their infant. SAFE is delivered through a secure, password-protected responsive website with practice opportunities.

Behavioral: Stress and Feeding (SAFE)

Interventions

The Stress Management component of the intervention acknowledges the mind-body connection between stress and adverse outcomes and consists of four web-based modules based on Lazarus and Folkman's Transactional Model of Stress and Coping designed to improve health outcomes. The Guided Feeding component of the intervention is based on the synactive theory of development. The synactive theory of development provides insight in to reading the physiological and behavioral cues of infants born preterm and involves weekly viewing of video clips of adaptive and maladaptive feeding behaviors of mothers and infants, practice opportunities, and follow-up phone calls.

Stress and Feeding (SAFE)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsWomen who have given birth to a premature infant (either male or female)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • English-speaking and reading
  • Given birth to preterm infant \< 35-weeks gestation
  • Has access to internet
  • Lives within 50-mile radius of hospital
  • Born less than 35 week gestation
  • No congenital anomalies that could interfere with feeding (e.g., diaphragmatic hernia, cleft lip/palate tracheoesophageal fistula, and cardiac anomalies

You may not qualify if:

  • Chronic neuroendocrine or immunologic condition
  • Currently using guided imagery or other mind-body techniques such as meditation
  • Psychiatric disorder involving a history of dissociative disorders, borderline personalities, and psychotic pathology
  • Grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage
  • Surgical necrotizing enterocolitis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Virginia Commonwealth University

Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Als, H. (1986). A synactive model of neonatal behavioral organization: framework for the assessment of neurobehavioral development in the premature infant and for support of infants and parents in the neonatal intensive care environment. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 6(2-3), 3-53. http://doi.org/10.1080/J006v06n03_02

    BACKGROUND
  • Als H, Gilkerson L. The role of relationship-based developmentally supportive newborn intensive care in strengthening outcome of preterm infants. Semin Perinatol. 1997 Jun;21(3):178-89. doi: 10.1016/s0146-0005(97)80062-6.

    PMID: 9205974BACKGROUND
  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.

    BACKGROUND
  • Pridham KF. Guided participation and development of care-giving competencies for families of low birth-weight infants. J Adv Nurs. 1998 Nov;28(5):948-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00814.x.

    PMID: 9840866BACKGROUND
  • Pridham K, Brown R, Clark R, Limbo RK, Schroeder M, Henriques J, Bohne E. Effect of guided participation on feeding competencies of mothers and their premature infants. Res Nurs Health. 2005 Jun;28(3):252-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20073.

    PMID: 15884024BACKGROUND
  • Jung JW. Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context (barbara rogoff). Korean J Med Educ. 2009 Jun;21(2):197-8. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2009.21.2.197. Epub 2009 Jun 30. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25813118BACKGROUND
  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    BACKGROUND
  • Schroeder M, Pridham K. Development of relationship competencies through guided participation for mothers of preterm infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;35(3):358-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00049.x.

    PMID: 16700685BACKGROUND
  • Wethington, E., Glanz, K., & Schwartz, M. (2015). Stress, coping and health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health Behavior: theory, Research & Practice (5th ed., pp. 223-242). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.

    PMID: 16204405BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Feeding BehaviorPremature Birth

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior, AnimalBehaviorObstetric Labor, PrematureObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Lisa F Brown, PhD, RN

    Virginia Commonwealth University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: A one-group longitudinal repeated measures design. Data will be collected at baseline, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, and 16-weeks
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2018

First Posted

September 10, 2018

Study Start

May 15, 2019

Primary Completion

December 14, 2020

Study Completion

December 14, 2020

Last Updated

June 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan to share IPD with other researchers.

Locations