Heated Vest for Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
Developing a Feedback-Controlled Heated Vest to Address Thermoregulatory Dysfunction in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury
2 other identifiers
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Persons with higher levels of spinal cord injury (above the 2nd thoracic vertebrae; tetraplegia) are unable to maintain normal core body temperature (Tcore) when exposed to cool environments. In persons with tetraplegia, even limited exposure to cool temperatures may cause Tcore to approach hypothermic values and impair cognitive performance. Conversely, an increase in Tcore from subnormal to normal range may improve cognitive performance. Prior work has shown that cool seasonal temperatures have an adverse effect on personal comfort and the ability to perform vital daily activities of self-care in persons with tetraplegia. Interventions that address the vulnerability to hypothermia are limited. A self-regulating heated vest designed specifically for persons with tetraplegia is a novel and promising strategy to address this problem. By more effectively maintaining Tcore, the vest can decrease the adverse impact of cool temperatures on comfort, quality of life, and performance of vital daily tasks for Veterans with tetraplegia during the cooler seasons.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 25, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 1, 2024
CompletedMay 6, 2024
May 1, 2024
2.7 years
July 30, 2018
September 7, 2023
May 2, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Core Body Temperature (Tcore)
Tcore will be continuously monitored throughout baseline and thermal challenge periods (with heated \& non-heated vests) by a TX-2 Rectal probe and Iso-Thermex Multichannel Thermometer (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). The probe will be placed 10 cm beyond the anal sphincter.
Visits 2 & 3 (subjects with tetraplegia only): Continuously throughout baseline & Thermal Challenge (2 hrs) periods. The change in Tcore from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined.
Change in Cognitive Performance: WAIS-IV (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition)
WAIS-IV Digit Span test has 3, 16-point sections (Forward, Backward, Sequence) and assesses attention, processing speed, and working memory. Cognitive battery is administered at BL, after Thermal Challenge (tetra only). Testing conditions are distraction-free. The Forward section has 16 numerical sequences of successive increasing length (each 1 point). Participant is read the numbers, then asked to repeat the test numbers in the same order. In Backward, participant is asked to repeat the numbers in reverse order. In Sequence portion, the participant is asked to repeat the numbers in ascending order. Sections add to a WAIS-IV Total Score of 48. The greater the score, the better the cognitive function. The minimum score, which would represent not being able to repeat even the first sequence of numbers, is 0. We report the difference in WAIS-IV score before and after the cold challenge. The more negative the difference, the more cognitive impairment after cold challenge.
Visits 2 & 3 (subjects with tetraplegia only): At the end baseline (at 15 min) & end of Thermal Challenge (at 120 min) periods. The change in cognitive performance from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined. Each WAIS is 10 min
Change in Cognitive Performance: Delayed Recall
Delayed Recall section of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): Subjects will be asked to repeat 5 simple words immediately and then recall them after a 5-minute delay to assess working memory. In scoring the MoCA, one point is awarded for each of the five words. Thus, the score ranges from 0 (no words remembered) to 5 (all words remembered). A higher score represents a more intact delayed recall capacity. We administered the Delayed Recall of the MoCA before and after the cold challenge, in both the heated vest (powered) and non-heated vest control condition. The reported measure is the mean difference in MoCA Delayed Recall scores before and after the cold challenge. Here, a more negative number represents a greater degree of impairment in delayed recall (working memory) after the cold challenge.
Visits 2 & 3 tetraplegia only): At the end baseline (at 15 min) & end of Thermal Challenge (at 120 min) periods. The change in cognitive performance from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined. Each assessment requires 6 min.
Change in Cognitive Performance: Stroop
Stroop Color and Word: Subjects will be asked to read words of colors, colors of fonts to assess attention and processing speed; color of fonts of words which describe conflicting colors to assess response inhibition (executive functioning). Each assessment is 4 min. The Stroop Test yields three scores. The Raw Word score is the number of words correctly completed on the Word page in 45 seconds. Similarly for Color, and Color-Word. For example, in the color-word section, a participant correctly identifying the color of 61 words, the score is 61. Greater scores reflects greater executive functioning. Zero is the minimum score, which corresponds to not being able to read any of the words of colors or colors of fonts. Each words of colors or color of fonts correctly identified in time confer 1 point. We report the difference in Word-Color before the cold challenge and after the cold challenge, for each intervention. Negative differences represent impaired executive function.
Visits 2 & 3 (subjects with tetraplegia only): At the end baseline (at 15 min) & end of Thermal Challenge (at 120 min) periods. The change in cognitive performance from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Thermal Comfort (TC)
Visits 1, 2, & 3 (all subjects): During baseline & every 10 minutes throughout Thermal Challenge (2 hrs). The change in TC from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined.
Other Outcomes (2)
Change in Skin Temperature (Tsk) Under the Heated Vest
Visits 2 & 3 (all subjects): Continuously throughout baseline (15 min) & Thermal Challenge (2 hrs) periods. The change in Tsk from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined.
Change in Thermal Sensation (TS)
Visit 1 (able-bodied subjects only): During baseline & every 10 minutes throughout Thermal Challenge (2 hrs). The change in TS from baseline to the end of Thermal Challenge will be determined.
Study Arms (3)
Heated Vest Safety & Comfort (able-bodied subjects)
OTHERAble-bodied controls will be fitted with an appropriately sized heated vest, while wearing only a standard cotton T-shirt and shorts, and will remain seated in a wheelchair. Subjects will be transferred to a pre-cooled (18 degrees C) thermal chamber and data will be collected for 2 hours with the heated vest on full power. Outcome Variables for Visit 1: Skin thermocouple temperatures, subjective ratings of thermal sensation.
Heated Vest Efficacy (persons with tetraplegia)
EXPERIMENTALSubjects with tetraplegia, while seated and wearing only a standard cotton T-shirt and shorts, will be fitted with an appropriately sized heated vest. Subjects will be transferred to a pre-cooled (18 degrees C) thermal chamber and data will be collected for up to 2 hours with the self-regulating heated vest. Primary Dependent variables: core body temperature (Tcore), cognitive performance, and thermal comfort.
Non-Heated Vest control condition (persons with tetraplegia)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe same subjects with tetraplegia from the experimental arm, while seated and wearing only a standard cotton T-shirt and shorts, will be fitted with an appropriately sized, similarly insulated, but non-heated vest (control condition). Subjects will be transferred to a pre-cooled (18 degrees C) thermal chamber and data will be collected for up to 2 hours with the non-heated vest. Primary Dependent variables: core body temperature (Tcore), cognitive performance, and thermal comfort.
Interventions
Heated vest that regulates its heat output based on the user's skin, the user's core temperature, and the ambient temperature
A similarly insulated (compared to the experimental vest), but non-heated vest
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) and able-bodied subjects will be recruited according to the following criteria:
- Duration of injury 1 year
- Neurological Level of SCI \[C3-T1\]; American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) A \& B
- Euhydration
- Subjects will be instructed to avoid caffeine and alcohol
- maintain normal salt and water intake
- avoid strenuous exercise for 24 hours prior to study
You may not qualify if:
- Known heart, kidney, peripheral vascular or cerebrovascular disease
- High blood pressure
- History of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) or diagnosed cognitive impairment
- Untreated thyroid disease
- Diabetes mellitus
- Acute illness or infection
- Dehydration
- Smoking
- Pregnant women
- BMI\>30 kg/m2
- Broken, inflamed, or otherwise fragile skin
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY
The Bronx, New York, 10468-3904, United States
Related Publications (1)
Zhang H, Huizenga C, Arens E, Wang D. Thermal sensation and comfort in transient non-uniform thermal environments. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Sep;92(6):728-33. doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1137-y.
PMID: 15221406BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. John Handrakis
- Organization
- SPINAL CORD DAMAGE RESEARCH CENTER
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Philip Handrakis, PT DPT EdD
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2018
First Posted
September 7, 2018
Study Start
February 25, 2020
Primary Completion
October 31, 2022
Study Completion
October 31, 2022
Last Updated
May 6, 2024
Results First Posted
February 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share