PPV With Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Treatment-Naïve DME
Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Versus Intravitreal Ziv-Aflibercept for Treatment-Naïve Diabetic Macular Edema
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Treatment-naïve subjects with center-involved diabetic macular edema undergoing pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling will have similar visual outcomes but better anatomical outcomes compared to subjects undergoing intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy at one year.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Sep 2018
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 4, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 4, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 4, 2021
CompletedDecember 2, 2021
November 1, 2021
2.7 years
September 4, 2018
November 20, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
BCVA
Best-corrected visual acuity
6 months
Study Arms (2)
PPV/MP
EXPERIMENTALStudy Group: Treatment-naïve subjects with center-involved diabetic macular edema undergo pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling
Intravitreal Injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl Group: Treatment-naïve subjects with center-involved diabetic macular edema undergo intravitreal ziv-aflibercept monotherapy according to a fixed treatment schedule
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Patient able and willing to provide informed consent
- Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) is established.
- Patient has non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy and is treatment-naïve for diabetic retinopathy in the study eye. (Patients may NOT have received treatment of any kind for diabetic retinopathy to the study eye).
- Best corrected visual acuity letter score is 20/32 or worse, and 20/400 or better at the time of randomization in the study eye.
- On clinical exam, definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema involving the center of the macula is present in the study eye.
- Central subfield thickness on the spectral domain OCT is greater than 300 microns at the time of randomization in the study eye.
- (The investigator must verify accuracy of OCT scan by ensuring it is centered and of adequate quality).
- The study eye has no history of intraocular surgery within the previous four months. Previous uncomplicated cataract surgery otherwise shall be allowed if the study eye is longer than four months out at the time of randomization.
You may not qualify if:
- Proliferative diabetic retinopathy of any kind including neovascularization of the disc/retina/iris, presence of any degree of vitreous hemorrhage, and tractional retinal detachment must be excluded.
- Patients that received treatment to the posterior segment for any retinal condition must be excluded. Such treatments include intravitreal injections of any kind, retinal lasers of any kind, and subtenons injections.
- The study eye has a history of previous anterior or pars plana vitrectomy for any reason must be excluded.
- The patient has a history of systemic anti-VEGF therapy or systemic corticosteroid therapy within the previous 12 months.
- The patient's macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.
- An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, a nonretinal condition like corneal scarring or advanced optic nerve cupping from glaucoma, etc.).
- Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely decreasing visual acuity by three or more lines on its own merit (apart from the macular edema).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital La Carlota
Montemorelos, Nuevo León, Mexico
Related Publications (1)
Rush RB, Rush SW. Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Treatment-Naive Diabetic Macular Edema: A Prospective, Uncontrolled Pilot Study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 21;15:2619-2624. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S320214. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34188440DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Sloan Rush
panhandle eye group
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2018
First Posted
September 6, 2018
Study Start
September 4, 2018
Primary Completion
May 4, 2021
Study Completion
May 4, 2021
Last Updated
December 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share