Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty(TKA)
Is Clinical Outcome of Robotic-Assisted TKA Better Than Conventional Manual TKA?Prospective, Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
674
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced to attempt to enhance the precision of bone preparation, component alignment and ultimately improve clinical results and survivorship of TKA. Although several published data suggest that bone preparation, and knee component alignment were improved by using robotic assistance, there is no high-quality evidence from randomized trials at long-term of which investigators are aware evaluating whether the improved bone preparation and knee component alignment improved clinical function or longevity of the TKA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jan 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2018
CompletedJuly 23, 2019
July 1, 2019
6.1 years
August 19, 2018
July 21, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Knee society Knee score
a proven score for the measurement of knee function, the score ranges from 0 to 100, 100 being the best possible score, indicating normal knee function
20 years after the surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
WOMAC score
20 years after the surgery
Study Arms (2)
Robot
EXPERIMENTALTKA is done with robotic-assisted manner. Final implantation of implants is done by surgeons, same as the conventional way. Robotic-assisted TKA for this arm.
Conventional
ACTIVE COMPARATORTKA is done with conventional instruments. Conventional TKA for this arm.
Interventions
Total knee arthroplasty is carried out with help of robotic surgery system, using a Robodoc system. CT-based preoperative planning using ORTHODOC (Integrated Surgical Technology Corp) performed in the first step before the day of surgery, and the robotic-assisted surgery using the ROBODOC surgical assistance in the second step. The bone markers are registered to the computer, and the computer arm does all the cutting and preparation of bones. This is in contrast to conventional jigs and cutting blocks. Actual implantation of the implants is done by a surgeon. A Duracon posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prosthesis (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahawh, NJ, USA) are used in all knees.
Total knee arthroplasty is carried out with classical, conventional, manual method. A surgeon measures the angle, length of the cuts with bone landmarks and specialized surgical instruments. After all the cuts actual implantation is done. A Duracon posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prosthesis (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahawh, NJ, USA) are used in all knees.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- end stage knee arthritis
You may not qualify if:
- mild knee deformity
- inflammatory arthritis
- foot and ankle disorder
- dementia
- hip disease
- history of a stroke
- older than 65 years of age
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Sep;77(9):1331-4. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199509000-00006.
PMID: 7673281BACKGROUNDBellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40.
PMID: 3068365BACKGROUNDBellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:111-6. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318126c0c0.
PMID: 17563698BACKGROUNDCrowder AR, Duffy GP, Trousdale RT. Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty in young patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct;20(7 Suppl 3):12-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.05.020.
PMID: 16213997BACKGROUNDDecking J, Theis C, Achenbach T, Roth E, Nafe B, Eckardt A. Robotic total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of CT-based component placement. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Oct;75(5):573-9. doi: 10.1080/00016470410001448.
PMID: 15513489BACKGROUNDJacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Oct;31(10):2353-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.026. Epub 2016 May 18.
PMID: 27325369BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2018
First Posted
September 6, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2002
Primary Completion
February 1, 2008
Study Completion
July 1, 2018
Last Updated
July 23, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07