A Study Evaluating the Diagnostic Yield and Safety of the ProCore vs Conventional EBUS-TBNA Needle in Subjects With Suspected Sarcoidosis
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the yield and safety of two different needles for performing endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in patients with sarcoidosis. The two needles that will be compared will be the 22-gauge ProCore needle and the conventional 22-gauge EBUS-TBNA needle.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2019
CompletedFebruary 23, 2021
February 1, 2021
12 months
August 22, 2018
February 22, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients with sarcoidosis diagnosed by EBUS-TBNA (Diagnostic yield)
The diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of patients with a final diagnosis of sarcoidosis diagnosed by EBUS-TBNA
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of patients with adequate EBUS-TBNA aspirate on cytology
2 weeks
Incidence of adverse events related to EBUS-TBNA procedure in the two groups
1 week
Study Arms (2)
Procore needle
EXPERIMENTALEchoTip ProCore needle (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, Ind., USA)
Conventional needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional 22-gauge EBUS-TBNA needle (Vizishot, Olympus, Japan)
Interventions
EBUS-TBNA with the EchoTip ProCore needle (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, Ind., USA)
EBUS-TBNA with the conventional 22-gauge EBUS-TBNA needle (Vizishot, Olympus, Japan)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age group of 18 to 75 years
- Clinicoradiological suspicion of sarcoidosis where EBUS-TBNA is being planned
- Enlarged hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes \>10 mm (any axis) on computed tomography of the chest
- Ability to provide informed consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Hypoxemia (SpO2 \<92% on FiO2 of 0.3)
- Treatment with systemic glucocorticoids for \>2 weeks in the preceding three months
- Diagnosis of sarcoidosis possible with another minimally invasive technique such as skin biopsy or peripheral lymph node biopsy
- Failure to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bronchoscopy suite, PGIMER
Chandigarh, 160012, India
Related Publications (1)
Dhooria S, Sehgal IS, Prasad KT, Muthu V, Gupta N, Bal A, Ram B, Aggarwal AN, Agarwal R. Diagnostic yield and safety of the ProCore versus the standard EBUS-TBNA needle in subjects with suspected sarcoidosis. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Feb;18(2):211-216. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1876560. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
PMID: 33435733DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ashutosh N Aggarwal
Professor & Head
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2018
First Posted
September 4, 2018
Study Start
August 1, 2018
Primary Completion
July 31, 2019
Study Completion
July 31, 2019
Last Updated
February 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02