Comparison of Conventional Versus Conservative Caries Removal in Primary Teeth
Caries_removal
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparison of Conventional Versus Conservative Caries Removal in Primary Teeth: a Two-year Evaluation
1 other identifier
interventional
49
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The sample will be, at least, 90 primary molars, randomly distributed into three groups: Group 1: IPC; Group 2: SE; Group 3: SCR. Teeth must present deep caries lesions (at least 2/3 of dentin depth), pulp vitality (no clinical or radiographical signs of pulp disease, such as abcesses, fistulae, root resorption, abnormal tooth mobility). This study received approval by the Ethics Committee of Fluminense Federal University (UFF; Brazil) - # CAAE: 58812816.8.0000.5626. The study started in January, 2017; and will finish in December, 2020. Patients will be selected from the public schools in Nova Friburgo. The dental exams and treatment procedures will be done at the clinics from the School of Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo (ISNF). Laboratory proceedings will be done at:
- Clinical and Microbiological Research Laboratory (LAB PECMA - ISNF) - Sample storage, bacterial cultivation and identification.
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Rio de Janeiro Federal University
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 5, 2020
CompletedAugust 29, 2018
August 1, 2018
1 year
August 21, 2018
August 24, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pulp vitality maintenance diagnosed by clinical exam
Among the three treatment protocols, which one will have better prognosis in maintaining pulp vitality. The clinical parameters of pulpal failures are: pain, presence of abscess, fistulae and/or abnormal tooth mobility.
Through study completion, up to three years.
Pulp vitality maintenance diagnosed by radiograph exam
The prognosis of maintaining pulp vitality will be acessed by radiological signs of loss of vitality, as presence of abnormal root resorption and/or bone resorption.
Through study completion, up to three years.
Study Arms (3)
Indirect Pulp Capping
ACTIVE COMPARATORNonselective removal to hard dentine (formerly complete excavation or complete caries removal) : removal of soft dentin, only hard dentine is left on the cavity, so that demineralized dentine "free" of bacteria is completely removed. Intervention: Total soft and leathery caries removal. Carious dentin removal
Stepwise excavation
EXPERIMENTALStepwise removal is carious tissue removal in 2 stages, i.e., visits. Soft carious tissue is left over the pulp in the first step, while peripheral dentine is prepared to hard dentine to allow a complete and durable seal of the lesion. A provisional restoration is placed, which should be sufficiently durable to last up to 6 months to allow changes in the dentine and pulp to take place. After this period, a second excavation is done and, if there is hard dentin formed, the tooth is restored. Intervention: Part of the soft caries is removed. Final restoration is placed on the second visit. Carious dentin removal
Selective caries removal
EXPERIMENTALSelective caries removal: only part the soft dentine is removed, so soft carious tissue is left over the pulp, while peripheral enamel and dentine are prepared to hard dentine, to allow a tight seal and placement of a durable restoration. Intervention: Part of the soft caries is removed. Final restoration is place over the soft dentin. Carious dentin removal
Interventions
Carious tissue removal and managing deep cavitated carious lesions in primary teeth.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The child need to be healthy;
- This should be in the age range of 4 to 6 years of age;
- The primary molars to be submitted to treatment should have the following characteristics: deep caries lesion (greater than or equal to 2/3 of dentine thickness) without clinical or radiographic aspects of pulp lesion, restoration margins above gingival line, absence of spontaneous pain or mobility, absence of periodontal changes, roots compatible with pulpal maturation stage.
You may not qualify if:
- Children under use of controlled drugs or antibiotics.
- Children who presented with some neurological or motor disorder that could influence the treatment procedure.
- Molars with more than three lost walls or margins in subgingival area.
- Patients with allergies to the medications used.
- Patients in the pulpal regression stage in which the tooth is likely to be lost within 12 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Apoena A Ribeiro, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2018
First Posted
August 29, 2018
Study Start
January 15, 2017
Primary Completion
January 15, 2018
Study Completion
January 5, 2020
Last Updated
August 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08