NCT03650530

Brief Summary

Even though most children with cancer now survive the ill child has to go through painful treatments which include suffering and uncertainty for all family members. The overall aim is to evaluate a modified version of the Family Talk Intervention (FTI) among families affected by childhood cancer. The goals of FTI are to increase family communication, the family members' resilience, knowledge about the illness, and thereby reduce the family members' long-term psychosocial well-being. Specific aims are to assess the feasibility (Aim 1) and the possible effects of the FTI (Aim 2). Two to three months after diagnosis families at one of six pediatric oncology units in Sweden will be recruited to FTI. All families at this unit who have a child (with cancer and/or sibling) in the age of 6 to 19 will be asked to participate. The recruitment will continuing for 9 months. The core elements in the intervention are to support: 1) the families in talking about the illness and related subjects, 2) the parents in understanding the needs of their children and how to support them, and 3) the families in identifying their strengths and how to use them. FTI entails six meetings with two interventionists (with the whole family and with the individual members of the family) at 1-2 weekly intervals. Questionnaires, interviews and field notes will be used to evaluate the intervention. Time points for data collection: before the intervention starts (baseline), directly after the intervention (follow-up 1) and 6 months after baseline (follow-up 2). Since few intervention studies (if any) of this kind have been carried out in pediatric oncology in Sweden to date, this study fills a knowledge gap. Research has described how cancer affects the whole family, and the importance of an open and honest communication about the illness in order to reduce the psychological suffering. The interventions presented here are likely to improve communication within the family, which may reduce the risk of long-term psychological distress for all family members.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
27

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 20, 2018

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 28, 2018

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2018

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2019

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

August 20, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 2, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Family-centred interventionSupport programThe Family Talk Intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Survey data on family communication

    Changed family Communication will be measured with the Family Communication Scale. The minimum possible score is 10 points, and the maximum possible score is 50 points. A higher score indicates a better level of family communication. Total score of 10-29 represent very low level of communication, 30-35 low level of communication, 36-39 moderate level of communication, 40-44 high level of communication and 45-50 very high level of communication. A step within the framework of very high/high/moderate/low/very low represents a change. Study-specific questions will also be used.

    Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Survey data on psychosocial health

    Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)

  • Survey data regarding knowledge about the illness

    Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)

  • Survey data on family satisfaction

    Baseline (before the intervention start), follow-up 1 (after the end of the intervention, approximately 2 months after baseline) and follow-up 2 (approximately 6 months after baseline)

Study Arms (1)

The Family Talk Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

These families will participate in a psychosocial support program.

Other: The Family Talk Intervention

Interventions

The family meets two interventionists at six time points.

Also known as: Beardslee's Family Intervention
The Family Talk Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • One of the children in the family, the ill child or the sibling(s), have to be between 6-19 years old
  • At least one adult and one child in the age 6-19 from the same family have to participate
  • The family members have to understand and talk Swedish

You may not qualify if:

  • Families with children only under 6 years or over 19 years
  • Families were only the parent(s) or the children want to participate
  • Families that do not speak and write Swedish.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College

Stockholm, SE- 10061, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Eklund R, Lovgren M. The Family Talk Intervention in Pediatric Oncology: Ill Children's Descriptions of Feasibility and Potential Effects. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs. 2022 May-Jun;39(3):143-154. doi: 10.1177/27527530221068423. Epub 2022 Feb 17.

  • Iveus K, Eklund R, Kreicbergs U, Lovgren M. Family bonding as a result of the family talk intervention in pediatric oncology: Siblings' experiences. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Mar;69(3):e29517. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29517. Epub 2021 Dec 31.

  • Lovgren M, Kreicbergs U, Udo C. Family talk intervention in paediatric oncology: a pilot study protocol. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019 Jan 31;3(1):e000417. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000417. eCollection 2019.

Study Officials

  • Malin Lövgren, PhD

    Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: An intervention study with a single group design.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assiciate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2018

First Posted

August 28, 2018

Study Start

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion

August 31, 2019

Study Completion

August 31, 2020

Last Updated

February 3, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPD is not planed to be shared with other researchers outside the group.

Locations