NCT03650387

Brief Summary

The primary objective is to collect clinical data to confirm performance and safety for RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine, when used in accordance with its labelling in the treatment of nasolabial folds, marionette lines and/or upper cheek volume loss.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
207

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

7 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2018

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 28, 2018

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 17, 2018

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 26, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 26, 2020

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 18, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

December 5, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

August 27, 2018

Results QC Date

May 25, 2021

Last Update Submit

November 14, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Responder Rate for Nasolabial Folds Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the Merz Nasolabial Folds Scale (MNLFS) at Week 12/16 (Depending on Touch-up)

    The MNLFS was used to assess the severity of nasolabial folds. The assessment was performed separately for the left and the right nasolabial fold by the blinded rater and the treating investigator (at baseline only prior to SMD injection) by live rating. MNLFS was a 5 point scale ranging as: 0 (no folds), 1 (mild folds), 2 (moderate folds), 3 (severe folds), 4 (very severe folds). Responders rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved improvement of greater than or equal to (\>=) 1 point in both folds (left and right) from Day 1 pre-injection to Week 12/16 (depending on touch-up). As planned, the cumulative data was collected for Week 12 or Week 16 based on the touch-up.

    At Week 12 (for participants with no touch-up) or Week 16 (for participants with touch-up)

  • Responder Rate for Marionette Lines Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the Merz Marionette Lines Scale (MMLS) at Week 12/16 (Depending on Touch-up)

    The MMLS was used to assess the severity of marionette lines. The assessment was performed separately for the left and the right marionette line by the blinded rater and the treating investigator (at baseline only prior to SMD injection) by live rating. MMLS was a 5 point scale ranging as: 0 (no lines), 1 (mild lines), 2 (moderate lines), 3 (severe lines), 4 (very severe lines). Responders rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved improvement of \>=1 point in both marionette lines (left and right) from Day 1 pre-injection to Week 12/16 (depending on touch-up). As planned, the cumulative data was collected for Week 12 or Week 16 based on the touch-up.

    At Week 12 (for participants with no touch-up) or Week 16 (for participants with touch-up)

  • Responder Rate for Cheek Fullness Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the Merz Upper Cheek Fullness Scale (MUCFS) at Week 12/16 (Depending on Touch-up)

    The MUCFS was used to assess the severity of volume loss of upper cheeks. The assessment was performed separately for the left and the right cheek by the blinded rater and the treating investigator (at baseline only prior to SMD injection) by live rating. MUCFS was a 5 point scale ranging as: 0 (full upper cheek), 1 (mildly sunken upper cheek), 2 (moderately sunken upper cheek), 3 (severely sunken upper cheek), 4 (very severely sunken upper cheek). Responders rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved improvement of \>=1 point in both cheeks (left and right) from Day 1 pre-injection to Week 12/16 (depending on touch-up). As planned, the cumulative data was collected for Week 12 or Week 16 based on the touch-up.

    At Week 12 (for participants with no touch-up) or Week 16 (for participants with touch-up)

  • Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Baseline up to Week 72 (for participants with no touch-up) or Week 76 (for participants with touch-up)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Responder Rate for Nasolabial Folds Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the MNLFS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), at Week 24/28, at Week 48/52, and at Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up)

    At Week 4 (prior to optional touch-up); at Weeks 24, 48 and 72 (for participants with no touch-up) or at Weeks 28, 52 and 76 (for participants with touch-up)

  • Responder Rate for Marionette Lines Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the MMLS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), at Week 24/28, at Week 48/52, and at Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up)

    At Week 4 (prior to optional touch-up); and at Weeks 24, 48 and 72 (for participants with no touch-up) or at Weeks 28, 52 and 76 (for participants with touch-up)

  • Responder Rate for Cheek Fullness Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the MUCFS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), at Week 24/28, at Week 48/52, and at Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up)

    At Week 4 (prior to optional touch-up); at Weeks 24, 48 and 72 (for participants with no touch-up) or at Weeks 28, 52 and 76 (for participants with touch-up)

  • Number of Participants Based on Treating Investigator's Evaluation of the Global Aesthetic Improvement on the iGAIS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), Week 12/16, Week 24/28, Week 48/52, and Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up Performed)

    At Week 4 (prior to optional touch-up); at Weeks 12, 24, 48 and 72 (for participants with no touch-up) or at Weeks 16, 28, 52 and 76 (for participants with touch-up)

  • Number of Participants Based on Participant's Evaluation of the Global Aesthetic Improvement on the sGAIS at Week 4 (Prior to Optional Touch-up), Week 12/16, Week 24/28, Week 48/52, and Week 72/76 (Depending on Touch-up Performed)

    At Week 4 (prior to optional touch-up); at Weeks 12, 24, 48 and 72 (for participants with no touch-up) or at Weeks 16, 28, 52 and 76 (for participants with touch-up)

Study Arms (1)

RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine

Interventions

RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine will be injected as per its current approved labelling and investigator's usual practice

Also known as: Radiesse® Injectable Dermal Filler with Lidocaine
RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years old.
  • Participants seeking for dermal filler/volumising treatment in at least two of the following indications:
  • Nasolabial folds;
  • Marionette lines;
  • Cheek volume loss.
  • Nasolabial folds volume deficit of moderate to very severe intensity (grade 2 to 4) on the Merz Nasolabial Folds Scale with symmetrical rating at Day 1 as determined by the blinded rater and confirmed by the treating investigator afterwards.
  • Marionette lines volume deficit of moderate to very severe intensity (grade 2 to 4) on the Merz Marionette Lines Scale with symmetrical rating at Day 1 as determined by the blinded rater and confirmed by the treating investigator afterwards.
  • Upper cheek volume deficit of moderate to very severe intensity (grade 2 to 4) on the Merz Upper Cheek Fullness Scale with symmetrical rating at Day 1 as determined by the blinded rater and confirmed by the treating investigator afterwards.

You may not qualify if:

  • Any prior treatment with silicone, polymethyl methacrylate, fat injections, poly L-lactic acid or permanent dermal fillers in the face.
  • Any prior facial surgery, including facial plastic surgery, thread lift, any unknown treatment, or any surgical permanent implant that could interfere with performance assessments.
  • Prior treatment within the past 24 months with porcine based collagen fillers or with volumisers (e.g., Belotero® Volume or others) in the area to be treated.
  • Prior treatment within the past 18 months with calcium hydroxylapatite in the area to be treated.
  • Prior treatment within the past 12 months with hyaluronic acid in the area to be treated.
  • Prior treatment within the past 6 months with facial dermal therapies (e.g. epilation, ultraviolet irradiation, radiofrequency, facial ablative or non-ablative laser treatment, microderm abrasion, mechanical or chemical peels, non-invasive skin-tightening \[e.g., Ultherapy, Thermage\] or surgical procedures) or plans to receive this during participation in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

Rosenpark Research, Merz Investigational Site #490099

Darmstadt, 64283, Germany

Location

Universität Hamburg Fachbereich Chemie Institut für Biologie und Molekularbiologie , Merz Investigational Site #490095

Hamburg, 20146, Germany

Location

Derma Science GmbH Hamburg, Merz Investigational Site #490345

Hamburg, 22609, Germany

Location

Privatpraxis für Dermatologie und Ästhetik, Merz Investigational Site #490371

Munich, 80539, Germany

Location

Dermatologie München-Neuhausen, Merz Investigational Site #490372

Munich, 80636, Germany

Location

Haut-und Lasercentrum, Merz Investigational Site #0490362

Potsdam, 14467, Germany

Location

Centroderm GmbH, Merz Investigational Site #490367

Wuppertal, 42287, Germany

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Pavicic T, Sattler G, Fischer T, Dirschka T, Kerscher M, Gauglitz G, Dersch H, Kravtsov M, Heide I, Prager W. Calcium Hydroxyapatite Filler With Integral Lidocaine CaHA (+) for Soft Tissue Augmentation: Results from an Open-Label Multicenter Clinical Study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022 May 1;21(5):481-487. doi: 10.36849/JDD.6737.

    PMID: 35533030BACKGROUND

Results Point of Contact

Title
Public Disclosure Manager
Organization
Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH

Study Officials

  • Merz Medical Expert

    Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Rater-blinded live evaluation of scale scores (the blinded rater does not know which indications were treated)
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2018

First Posted

August 28, 2018

Study Start

September 17, 2018

Primary Completion

May 26, 2020

Study Completion

May 26, 2020

Last Updated

December 5, 2023

Results First Posted

June 18, 2021

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations