Patient-controlled Sedation Versus Target-controlled Infusion in Orthopaedic Surgery Under Central Neuraxial Block
Propofol Sedation in Orthopaedic Surgery Under Central Neuraxial Block: Patient-controlled Sedation Versus Target-controlled Infusion
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Orthopaedic surgeries involving the legs can be done under nerve block, where patients will be numb of pain at the operated site but awake during surgery. Sedation can be given to allay anxiety and provide comfort throughout the surgery. Sedation can be given by the anaesthetic doctors by using target-comtrolled infusion pump, or self-administered by patients by means of specialised machines. This study compares two method of administration of sedation, patient-controlled sedation (PCS) versus target-controlled infusion sedation (TCIS) by anaesthetic doctors, in people undergoing orthopaedic surgeries under nerve block.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 22, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 3, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 27, 2018
CompletedAugust 27, 2018
August 1, 2018
11 months
August 1, 2018
August 23, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
total propofol requirement between PCS versus TCI sedation (TCIS)
Total propofol requirement in both groups was calculated in mg/kg/hour.
Assessed from the beginning to the end of sedation, at the average of 120 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient satisfaction assessed by a 10-point numerical scale
Within one hour after recovery from sedation
Complications including incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, hypopnea, oxygen desaturation and over sedation
Assessed from the beginning to the end of sedation, at the average of 120 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Group PCS
EXPERIMENTALPatients in Group PCS (patient-controlled sedation) received intravenous (IV) propofol via a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion pump. The machine was set to deliver a demand bolus dose of 0.25 mg/kg with 1-minute lockout interval, without basal infusion.The patient was instructed to press on a hand-held device as often as required, to achieve their desired level of comfort or sedation.
Group TCIS
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in Group TCIS (target-controlled infusion sedation) received IV propofol via a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump, targeted at an initial effect site concentration (Cet) of 0.6 μg/ml, using the Schnider pharmacokinetic model. Upon attainment of 0.6 μg/ml Cet, the patient's sedation level was assessed. The Cet was increased or reduced accordingly by 0.2 μg/ml to attain an OAA/S score of 3.
Interventions
Patient-controlled propofol boluses for patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery under central neuraxial block
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II.
- Aged 18-65 years.
- Elective lower limb orthopaedic surgery under CNB anticipated to last for 1.5 to 2 hours
You may not qualify if:
- Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 30kg/m2
- Unable to cooperate (eg. mental disorders, language barrier)
- Drug abuse
- Alcoholism (chronic daily alcohol intake greater than 75 g of pure alcohol for ≥ 2 years, where 75g of alcohol = 5 cans of beer, 1 bottle of wine or half a pint of distilled spirit)
- Contraindications to the study drugs
- Pregnancy
- Significant pulmonary or cardiovascular diseases, including obstructive sleep apnoea and obesity hypoventilation syndrome
- Features of difficult airway
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
Related Publications (3)
Wahlen BM, Kilian M, Schuster F, Muellenbach R, Roewer N, Kranke P. Patient-controlled versus continuous anesthesiologist-controlled sedation using propofol during regional anesthesia in orthopedic procedures--a pilot study. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Nov;9(16):2733-9. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.16.2733.
PMID: 18937608RESULTEkin A, Donmez F, Taspinar V, Dikmen B. Patient-controlled sedation in orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia: a new approach in procedural sedation. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2013 Sep-Oct;63(5):410-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2012.07.012.
PMID: 24263045RESULTSingh T, Ravishankar M. Conscious sedation with propofol for surgeries under spinal anaesthesia: anaesthesiologist versus patient controlled. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 21:169-173, 2005.
RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nadia Md Nor, MMED(Anaes)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2018
First Posted
August 27, 2018
Study Start
June 22, 2017
Primary Completion
May 3, 2018
Study Completion
May 3, 2018
Last Updated
August 27, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08