NCT03647735

Brief Summary

Orthopaedic surgeries involving the legs can be done under nerve block, where patients will be numb of pain at the operated site but awake during surgery. Sedation can be given to allay anxiety and provide comfort throughout the surgery. Sedation can be given by the anaesthetic doctors by using target-comtrolled infusion pump, or self-administered by patients by means of specialised machines. This study compares two method of administration of sedation, patient-controlled sedation (PCS) versus target-controlled infusion sedation (TCIS) by anaesthetic doctors, in people undergoing orthopaedic surgeries under nerve block.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
78

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 22, 2017

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 3, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 3, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 1, 2018

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 27, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 27, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

August 1, 2018

Last Update Submit

August 23, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • total propofol requirement between PCS versus TCI sedation (TCIS)

    Total propofol requirement in both groups was calculated in mg/kg/hour.

    Assessed from the beginning to the end of sedation, at the average of 120 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient satisfaction assessed by a 10-point numerical scale

    Within one hour after recovery from sedation

  • Complications including incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, hypopnea, oxygen desaturation and over sedation

    Assessed from the beginning to the end of sedation, at the average of 120 minutes

Study Arms (2)

Group PCS

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in Group PCS (patient-controlled sedation) received intravenous (IV) propofol via a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion pump. The machine was set to deliver a demand bolus dose of 0.25 mg/kg with 1-minute lockout interval, without basal infusion.The patient was instructed to press on a hand-held device as often as required, to achieve their desired level of comfort or sedation.

Other: patient-controlled sedation

Group TCIS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in Group TCIS (target-controlled infusion sedation) received IV propofol via a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump, targeted at an initial effect site concentration (Cet) of 0.6 μg/ml, using the Schnider pharmacokinetic model. Upon attainment of 0.6 μg/ml Cet, the patient's sedation level was assessed. The Cet was increased or reduced accordingly by 0.2 μg/ml to attain an OAA/S score of 3.

Other: patient-controlled sedation

Interventions

Patient-controlled propofol boluses for patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery under central neuraxial block

Group PCSGroup TCIS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II.
  • Aged 18-65 years.
  • Elective lower limb orthopaedic surgery under CNB anticipated to last for 1.5 to 2 hours

You may not qualify if:

  • Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 30kg/m2
  • Unable to cooperate (eg. mental disorders, language barrier)
  • Drug abuse
  • Alcoholism (chronic daily alcohol intake greater than 75 g of pure alcohol for ≥ 2 years, where 75g of alcohol = 5 cans of beer, 1 bottle of wine or half a pint of distilled spirit)
  • Contraindications to the study drugs
  • Pregnancy
  • Significant pulmonary or cardiovascular diseases, including obstructive sleep apnoea and obesity hypoventilation syndrome
  • Features of difficult airway

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Wahlen BM, Kilian M, Schuster F, Muellenbach R, Roewer N, Kranke P. Patient-controlled versus continuous anesthesiologist-controlled sedation using propofol during regional anesthesia in orthopedic procedures--a pilot study. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Nov;9(16):2733-9. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.16.2733.

  • Ekin A, Donmez F, Taspinar V, Dikmen B. Patient-controlled sedation in orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia: a new approach in procedural sedation. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2013 Sep-Oct;63(5):410-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2012.07.012.

  • Singh T, Ravishankar M. Conscious sedation with propofol for surgeries under spinal anaesthesia: anaesthesiologist versus patient controlled. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 21:169-173, 2005.

    RESULT

Study Officials

  • Nadia Md Nor, MMED(Anaes)

    Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2018

First Posted

August 27, 2018

Study Start

June 22, 2017

Primary Completion

May 3, 2018

Study Completion

May 3, 2018

Last Updated

August 27, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08

Locations