NCT03647241

Brief Summary

Patients at the Orthodontic Department of University of Damascus Dental School will be examined and subjects who meet the inclusion criteria will be admitted then the initial diagnostic records (diagnostic gypsum samples - internal and external oral photographs as well as radiographic images) will be studied to ensure that the selection criteria are accurately matched. The aim of this study is to compare three groups of patients with severe crowding of the upper anterior teeth:

  • Group 1 : Patients will be treated using self-ligating brackets
  • Group 2 : Patients will be treated using self-ligating brackets associated with flapless corticotomy.
  • Group 3 : Patients will be treated using traditional brackets (i.e. brackets positioned on the labial surface of the teeth) At the end of leveling and aligning phase, we will compare the self-ligating brackets and traditional brackets ( the acceleration of teeth movement, dental and alveolar changes and other variables ) Also, there is an intention to study the effectiveness of using flapless corticotomy with the self-ligating brackets.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 15, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 22, 2018

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 27, 2018

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 10, 2019

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 19, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

November 20, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

August 22, 2018

Last Update Submit

November 19, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Duration of Alignment

    The time required in days will be calculated from the beginning of treatment till the end of the alignment stage

    This variable is going to be measured at the end of the alignment stage (i.e. expected to occur within four to six months)

  • Change in Little's Index

    The irregularity of the upper and lower incisors is calculated by measuring the amount of deviation of the anatomic contact points between the six incisors in the horizontal direction in mm, since the sum of these measurements represents the value of the index (Little, 1975). The more the score is, the more crowded the case is.

    T0: one day before the beginning of treatment; T1: after one month; T2: after two months; T3: after three months; T4: after four months; T5: at the end of the alignment stage (which is expected to occur within 4 to 6 months)

  • Change in inter-canine width lingually

    The distance between the most lingual points on the lingual surface of the canines on the upper dental arch. This will be measured on plaster models.

    T1: One day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the alignment stage (is expected within four to six months)

  • Change in inter-canine width

    The distance between the cusp tips of the upper canines. This variable will be measured on plaster models.

    T1: One day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the alignment stage (is expected within four to six months)

  • Change in Canine Rotation Angle

    It is calculated by the angle formed between the median palatine suture and the line passing through the two medial and lateral contact points of the canine.

    T1: One day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the alignment stage (is expected within four to six months)

  • Change in Lateral Incisor Rotation Angle

    It is calculated by the angle formed between the median palatine suture and the line passing through the two medial and lateral contact points of the lateral incisor.

    T1: One day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the alignment stage (is expected within four to six months)

  • Change in Central Incisor Rotation Angle

    It is calculated by the angle formed between the median palatine suture and the line passing through the two medial and lateral contact points of the central incisor.

    T1: One day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the alignment stage (is expected within four to six months)

Study Arms (3)

Self-Ligating Brackets

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will be treated using self-ligating brackets to achieve proper alignment of teeth

Device: Self-Ligating Brackets

Self-Ligating Brackets with Corticotomy

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will be treated using self-ligating brackets with corticotomy (alveolar cortical cuts) in order to accelerate orthodontic treatment.

Device: Self-Ligating BracketsProcedure: Corticotomy

Traditionally-Ligated Brackets

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this group will be treated using traditionally-ligated brackets to achieve proper alignment of teeth

Device: Traditionally-Ligated Brackets

Interventions

These brackets can be opened and closed through the use of a sliding cap embedded into the design of these brackets. There is no need to use elastic modules to ligate the arch.

Also known as: SLBs
Self-Ligating BracketsSelf-Ligating Brackets with Corticotomy

These brackets are used in the conventional manner, where the orthodontist is obliged to use elastic modules to engage the arch into the slot of the bracket.

Also known as: Non-SLBs
Traditionally-Ligated Brackets
CorticotomyPROCEDURE

Corticotomy without flap elevations will be performed in order to induce acceleration in tooth movement during the orthodontic treatment in only one group.

Also known as: Piezosurgery, Decortication
Self-Ligating Brackets with Corticotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age17 Years - 28 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age of patients: 17-28 years.
  • Severe crowding greater than 6 mm on the upper jaw in which orthodontic treatment requires at least two upper extraction.
  • The Little's Index of Irregularity is over 7 mm.
  • There is no previous orthodontic treatment.
  • The patient dose not take any drug may interfere with the tooth movement (Cortisone, NSAIDs, ...).
  • The patient has good oral health (i.e., Plaque Index is less or equal to 1 according to Loe and Silness (1963).
  • Class I or mild class II (ANB ≤ 5) or mild class III (ANB ≥ 0) skeletal relationship.
  • Overbite is between 0-4 mm.
  • There is no skeletal constriction on the upper jaw.
  • Full presence of all permanent teeth in the dental arch (except for third molars)

You may not qualify if:

  • Any systemic diseases that would affect tooth movement .
  • Any congenital syndromes or cleft lip and palate cases
  • Bad oral health

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School

Damascus, DM20AM18, Syria

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Yang X, Xue C, He Y, Zhao M, Luo M, Wang P, Bai D. Transversal changes, space closure, and efficiency of conventional and self-ligating appliances : A quantitative systematic review. J Orofac Orthop. 2018 Jan;79(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00056-017-0110-4. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

    PMID: 29101414BACKGROUND
  • Yang X, Su N, Shi Z, Xiang Z, He Y, Han X, Bai D. Effects of self-ligating brackets on oral hygiene and discomfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Dent Hyg. 2017 Feb;15(1):16-22. doi: 10.1111/idh.12220. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

    PMID: 27095145BACKGROUND
  • Yang X, He Y, Chen T, Zhao M, Yan Y, Wang H, Bai D. Differences between active and passive self-ligating brackets for orthodontic treatment : Systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized clinical trials. J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Mar;78(2):121-128. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0059-8. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

    PMID: 28224175BACKGROUND
  • Qamruddin I, Alam MK, Mahroof V, Fida M, Khamis MF, Husein A. Effects of low-level laser irradiation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and associated pain with self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Nov;152(5):622-630. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.023.

    PMID: 29103440BACKGROUND
  • Nahas AZ, Samara SA, Rastegar-Lari TA. Decrowding of lower anterior segment with and without photobiomodulation: a single center, randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Jan;32(1):129-135. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2094-5. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

    PMID: 27761668BACKGROUND
  • Hassan SE, Hajeer MY, Alali OH, Kaddah AS. The Effect of Using Self-ligating Brackets on Maxillary Canine Retraction: A Split-mouth Design Randomized Controlled Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jun 1;17(6):496-503. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1879.

    PMID: 27484605BACKGROUND
  • Charavet C, Lecloux G, Bruwier A, Rompen E, Maes N, Limme M, Lambert F. Localized Piezoelectric Alveolar Decortication for Orthodontic Treatment in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Dent Res. 2016 Aug;95(9):1003-9. doi: 10.1177/0022034516645066. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

    PMID: 27129491BACKGROUND
  • Wahab RM, Idris H, Yacob H, Ariffin SH. Comparison of self- and conventional-ligating brackets in the alignment stage. Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):176-81. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq179. Epub 2011 Apr 8.

    PMID: 21478298BACKGROUND
  • Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Oct;134(4):470.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.018.

    PMID: 18929262BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

PiezosurgeryCerebral Decortication

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ultrasonic Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeNeurosurgical Procedures

Study Officials

  • Heba Al-Ibrahim, DDS

    MSc student at the Orthodontic Department, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD

    Associate Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Issam Khoury, DDS MSc PhD

    Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, SYRIA

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2018

First Posted

August 27, 2018

Study Start

August 15, 2018

Primary Completion

November 10, 2019

Study Completion

June 19, 2020

Last Updated

November 20, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations