Singing Your Negative Body-Related Thoughts
1 other identifier
interventional
133
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Study Objectives:
- 1.Examine whether singing can be used as a cognitive defusion strategy to change one's appraisals of body-related thoughts so they are less threatening to the individual.
- 2.Explore whether this technique can change the appraisals of one's body (i.e. increasing body satisfaction, increasing body esteem, decreasing the drive towards thinness), as well as increase mood and self-esteem.
- 3.Compare singing to the defusion strategy of verbal repetition, as well as control conditions, to determine the effectiveness of these techniques.
- 4.Examine whether defusion techniques would be particularly beneficial for individuals with high thought-shape fusion
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 3, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 5, 2021
CompletedMay 11, 2021
April 1, 2021
4 months
August 20, 2018
August 29, 2019
April 21, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Self-Ratings of Thought Appraisals (Believability)
Participants rated the believability of their body-related thought on a visual analogue scale that ranges from 0-100. Higher scores means greater believability of this negative thought.
Baseline, Post-Intervention (Day 1), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Self-Ratings of Thought Appraisals (Negativity)
Participants rated the negativity of their body-related thought on a visual analogue scale that ranges from 0-100. Higher scores means that the negative thought is perceived to be more negative.
Baseline, Post-Intervention (Day 1), and Follow-Up (Day 7)
Self-Ratings of Thought Appraisals (Discomfort)
Participants rated the discomfort of their body-related thought on a visual analogue scale that ranges from 0-100. Higher scores means that the thought is perceived to be more uncomfortable.
Baseline, Post-Intervention (Day 1), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Self-Ratings of Thought Appraisals (Willingness)
Participants rated their willingness to have their body-related thought on a visual analogue scale that ranges from 0-100. Higher scores means that they are more willing to have the thought.
Baseline, Post-Intervention (Day 1), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Self-Ratings of Thought Appraisals (Avoidance)
Participants rated their avoidance of their body-related thought on a visual analogue scale that ranges from 0-100. Higher scores means greater avoidance of the thought.
Baseline, Post-Intervention (Day 1), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Self-Ratings of Cognitive Fusion (Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire)
The Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire includes 7 items measured on a 7 item Likert scale and will be used to measure changes in cognitive fusion. Higher scores indicate higher degree of cognitive fusion. Total scores can range from 7 to 49.
Baseline and Follow-up (Day 7)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Self-Ratings of Body Image Cognitions (Weight Dissatisfaction)
Baseline, Post-Intervention (Day 1), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Self-Ratings of Body Image Cognitions (Appearance Dissatisfaction)
Baseline, Post-Intervention (Day 1), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Self-ratings of Body Image Distress (Body Image State Scale)
Baseline, Post-Intervention (Day 1), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Self-Ratings of Mood (Anxiety)
Baseline, Post-Intervention (Day 1), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Self-Ratings of Mood (Depression)
Baseline, Post-Intervention (Day 1), and Follow-up (Day 7)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Verbally repeat body-related thoughts
EXPERIMENTALA cognitive defusion strategy in which participants repeat a target unwanted thought out loud and as quickly as possible for 60 seconds.
Sing negative body-related thoughts
EXPERIMENTALA cognitive defusion strategy in which participants sing a target unwanted thought to the tune of 'twinkle, twinkle' for 60 seconds
Verbally repeat body-unrelated thoughts
NO INTERVENTIONA control condition in which participants repeat the phrase "I am talking" out loud and as quickly as possible for 60 seconds.
Sing body-unrelated thoughts
NO INTERVENTIONA control condition in which participants sing the phrase "I am singing" to the tune of 'twinkle, twinkle' for 60 seconds
Interventions
Cognitive defusion aims to change one's relationship to their thoughts - as opposed to changing the content, form, or frequency - by reframing internal experiences as less threatening (Hayes, Luoma, Bond, Masuda, \& Lillis, 2006). It is the process of detaching the link between one's thoughts and perceptions of reality and acknowledging the role one's thoughts play in their internal events. A number of techniques have been developed to remove the literal quality of such thoughts, including repeating the thought, and, more recently, singing the thought.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Restrained eaters, as indicated by a score of 15 or greater on the Revised Restraint Scale (Polivy, Herman, \& Howard, 1988)
- Identify as female
- Age 17 and older
You may not qualify if:
- Under age 17
- Do not identify as female
- Scores below 15 on the Revised Restraint Scale (Polivy, Herman, \& Howard, 1988).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- York Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
York University
Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006.
PMID: 16300724BACKGROUNDPolivy, J., Herman, P. H., & Howard, K. I. (1988). Restraint scale: Assessment of dieting. In M. Hersen & A. S. Bel lack (Eds.), Dictionary of behavioral assessment techniques (pp. 377- 380). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
BACKGROUND
Limitations and Caveats
No limitations or caveats to declare
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Keisha C. Gobin, MA
- Organization
- York University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Keisha C Gobin, BA
York University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2018
First Posted
August 24, 2018
Study Start
October 3, 2018
Primary Completion
January 30, 2019
Study Completion
January 30, 2019
Last Updated
May 11, 2021
Results First Posted
April 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04