The Accuracy of the Performance and Placement Test for Predicting Supraglottic Airway Device (SAD) Position in the Hypopharynx as Confirmed With Video Laryngoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The supraglottic airway device (SAD) is currently widely used in patients undergoing general anaesthesia as a method of securing the airway. The usage of SAD does not require the patient to be paralysed prior to insertion, as opposed to an endotracheal tube. Five tests have been recommend to ensure that the SAD can be used for advanced procedure after a blind insertion. These tests however are not confirmed with visual validation and hence the confirmation of optimal position can be misleading. This study is conducted to validate by video laryngoscopy the five recommended tests for confirming the placement and efficacy of a SAD, thus enabling its safe application in institutions with limited availability of video laryngoscopes. Subjects for this study will consist of patients scheduled for procedures under general anaesthesia in the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) who are amenable to supraglottic airway management.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedAugust 23, 2018
August 1, 2018
1.2 years
August 20, 2018
August 21, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To evaluate the accuracy of the performance and placement tests for predicting SAD position in the hypopharynx as confirmed with video laryngoscopy
If all five placement and performance tests are successful, optimal (Grade 1) view of the SAD from video-laryngoscopy is expected.
Intraoperative (from commencement of SAD insertion until confirmation of satisfactory SAD placement via video-laryngoscopy)
Interventions
Following insertion of a supraglottic airway device (SAD), the placement and performance tests are carried out. If the tests are successful, a video-laryngoscopy will be performed to confirm the placement of the SAD in the hypopharynx.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients scheduled for procedures under general anaesthesia in the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) who are amenable to supraglottic airway management.
You may not qualify if:
- \- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class IV and above
- \- morbid obesity (BMI \> 40kg/m2)
- \- high risk of regurgitation or aspiration (e.g. symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux, hiatus hernia)
- \- respiratory tract pathology (e.g. preoperative sore throat)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Timmermann A, Bergner UA, Russo SG. Laryngeal mask airway indications: new frontiers for second-generation supraglottic airways. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Dec;28(6):717-26. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000262.
PMID: 26539790BACKGROUNDVan Zundert AAJ, Gatt SP, Kumar CM, Van Zundert TCRV, Pandit JJ. 'Failed supraglottic airway': an algorithm for suboptimally placed supraglottic airway devices based on videolaryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):645-649. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex093. No abstract available.
PMID: 28510747BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Officer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2018
First Posted
August 22, 2018
Study Start
September 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
August 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- From date of publication until seven years after publication