Lactated Ringer's Versus Normal Saline for Acute Pancreatitis
1 other identifier
interventional
121
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute pancreatitis is a common problem in the United States necessitating 275,000 hospital admissions per year, with resultant healthcare costs of approximately 2.5 billion USD annually. As numerous trials have failed to show a benefit to specific pharmacologic therapies in acute pancreatitis, the mainstay of treatment has been both supportive care and early, aggressive fluid resuscitation. Small randomized studies have shown conflicting results with regards to the influence of resuscitation fluid on outcomes in acute pancreatitis, necessitating a large randomized trial to clarify if fluid choice matters or not in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. The objective of this study is to assess the comparative efficacy of normal saline versus lactated ringer's solution in the management of acute pancreatitis. Patients presenting to the Los Angeles County Hospital with acute pancreatitis will be randomized to fluid resuscitation with NS or LR with volumes of fluid administered according to a pre-determined algorithm that will be the same for both treatment arms. The primary outcome of the study will be the change in SIRS prevalence from enrollment to 24 hours. Secondary outcomes will include the change in SIRS prevalence from enrollment to 48 hours and 72 hours, development of moderately severe or severe pancreatitis, change in PASS score, ICU admission, length of hospitalization, persistent pain or disability after discharge, and time of advancement to oral diet and discharge.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 18, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 16, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 16, 2021
CompletedDecember 8, 2021
December 1, 2021
2.9 years
February 12, 2018
December 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
SIRS at 24 hours
Change in SIRS prevalence from enrollment to 24 hours
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (12)
SIRS at 48 hours
48 hours
SIRS at 72 hours
72 hours
Moderately severe acute pancreatitis
48 hours
Severe acute pancreatitis
>48 hours
PASS score
24 hours
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lactated Ringer
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive fluid administration of Lactated Ringer's solution at a pre-determined volume algorithm that is the same for both arms
Normal Saline
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive fluid administration of Normal Saline solution at a pre-determined volume algorithm that is the same for both arms
Interventions
Fluid administration of bolus and maintenance fluids
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presentation with acute pancreatitis as defined by two of three criterion; amylase or lipase \> 3x the upper limit of normal, classical abdominal pain, or imaging suggestive of pancreatitis. Such radiographic findings include swelling, edema, or heterogeneity of the gland or peripancreatic fluid or stranding.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with severe pancreatitis as defined by the Revised Atlanta Classification will be excluded. Severe pancreatitis is defined by the Revised Atlanta Classification as those with a Modified Marshall score of \>2 for their cardiovascular renal, or respiratory system will be excluded (Figure 2).13 Practically this includes patients with systolic blood pressure \<90, serum creatinine \>1.9, and PaO2/FiO2 \<300 (Figure 3). Since blood gases are unlikely to be drawn on those with mild pancreatitis we will exclude patients with an oxygen saturation \<92% on room air and certainly any patients which require intubation for respiratory failure due to pancreatitis.
- Patients who cannot tolerate increased doses of fluids for other reasons will also be excluded. This consists of those with cardiac insufficiency (CI, \>NYHA Class II heart failure), pulmonary edema, dialysis requirement, or severe liver dysfunction (albumin \< 3mg/dL, known cirrhosis).
- Pregnant women will also be excluded as they are prone to retain sodium and water, which puts them at increased risk of pulmonary congestion, ascites or peripheral edema.
- Patients who are incarcerated, younger than eighteen, or unable to give informed consent will be excluded.
- Individuals who present with clinical signs of edema or anasacra, including pulmonary congestion, peripheral swelling, and ascites, will also be ineligible for the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
LAC+USC Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
Related Publications (17)
Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS; American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;108(9):1400-15; 1416. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.218. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
PMID: 23896955BACKGROUNDSingh VK, Gardner TB, Papachristou GI, Rey-Riveiro M, Faghih M, Koutroumpakis E, Afghani E, Acevedo-Piedra NG, Seth N, Sinha A, Quesada-Vazquez N, Moya-Hoyo N, Sanchez-Marin C, Martinez J, Lluis F, Whitcomb DC, Zapater P, de-Madaria E. An international multicenter study of early intravenous fluid administration and outcome in acute pancreatitis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Jun;5(4):491-498. doi: 10.1177/2050640616671077. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
PMID: 28588879BACKGROUNDForsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox CM. Acute Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1972-1981. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1505202. No abstract available.
PMID: 27959604BACKGROUNDBuxbaum JL, Quezada M, Da B, Jani N, Lane C, Mwengela D, Kelly T, Jhun P, Dhanireddy K, Laine L. Early Aggressive Hydration Hastens Clinical Improvement in Mild Acute Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 May;112(5):797-803. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.40. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
PMID: 28266591BACKGROUNDCuthbertson CM, Christophi C. Disturbances of the microcirculation in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 2006 May;93(5):518-30. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5316.
PMID: 16607683BACKGROUNDRaghunathan K, Shaw A, Nathanson B, Sturmer T, Brookhart A, Stefan MS, Setoguchi S, Beadles C, Lindenauer PK. Association between the choice of IV crystalloid and in-hospital mortality among critically ill adults with sepsis*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1585-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000305.
PMID: 24674927BACKGROUNDRochwerg B, Alhazzani W, Sindi A, Heels-Ansdell D, Thabane L, Fox-Robichaud A, Mbuagbaw L, Szczeklik W, Alshamsi F, Altayyar S, Ip WC, Li G, Wang M, Wludarczyk A, Zhou Q, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Jaeschke R, Annane D; Fluids in Sepsis and Septic Shock Group. Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Sep 2;161(5):347-55. doi: 10.7326/M14-0178.
PMID: 25047428BACKGROUNDCorrea TD, Cavalcanti AB, Assuncao MS. Balanced crystalloids for septic shock resuscitation. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016 Oct-Dec;28(4):463-471. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20160079.
PMID: 28099643BACKGROUNDWu BU, Hwang JQ, Gardner TH, Repas K, Delee R, Yu S, Smith B, Banks PA, Conwell DL. Lactated Ringer's solution reduces systemic inflammation compared with saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug;9(8):710-717.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.026. Epub 2011 May 12.
PMID: 21645639BACKGROUNDLipinski M, Rydzewska-Rosolowska A, Rydzewski A, Rydzewska G. Fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis: Normal saline or lactated Ringer's solution? World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 21;21(31):9367-72. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9367.
PMID: 26309362BACKGROUNDde-Madaria E, Soler-Sala G, Lopez-Font I, Zapater P, Martinez J, Gomez-Escolar L, Sanchez-Fortun C, Sempere L, Perez-Lopez J, Lluis F, Perez-Mateo M. Update of the Atlanta Classification of severity of acute pancreatitis: should a moderate category be included? Pancreatology. 2010;10(5):613-9. doi: 10.1159/000308795. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
PMID: 21042037BACKGROUNDBalthazar EJ. Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology. 2002 Jun;223(3):603-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2233010680.
PMID: 12034923BACKGROUNDWarndorf MG, Kurtzman JT, Bartel MJ, Cox M, Mackenzie T, Robinson S, Burchard PR, Gordon SR, Gardner TB. Early fluid resuscitation reduces morbidity among patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Aug;9(8):705-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.03.032. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
PMID: 21554987BACKGROUNDCotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):383-93. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2.
PMID: 2070995BACKGROUNDBanks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
PMID: 23100216BACKGROUNDWu BU, Batech M, Quezada M, Lew D, Fujikawa K, Kung J, Jamil LH, Chen W, Afghani E, Reicher S, Buxbaum J, Pandol SJ. Dynamic Measurement of Disease Activity in Acute Pancreatitis: The Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):1144-1152. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.114. Epub 2017 May 2.
PMID: 28462914BACKGROUNDBuxbaum J, Quezada M, Chong B, Gupta N, Yu CY, Lane C, Da B, Leung K, Shulman I, Pandol S, Wu B. The Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System predicts clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis: findings from a prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 May;113(5):755-764. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0048-1. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
PMID: 29545634BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Buxbaum, MD
University of Southern California
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 12, 2018
First Posted
August 22, 2018
Study Start
September 18, 2018
Primary Completion
August 16, 2021
Study Completion
August 16, 2021
Last Updated
December 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12