Honey Versus Povidone-iodine on Laceration Wounds
Comparison of Honey and Povidone-iodine in Wound Healing on Acute Laceration Wounds: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates healing time in usage of honey and povidone-iodine over paraffin gauze as dressings in the treatment of acute laceration wounds. In Indonesia, especially in rural area, where most of the resources is limited and modern dressings are expensive and hard-to-find. The investigators tried to find an alternative which was easier to find and could act as a substitute of modern wound dressing. The hypothesis of this study is honey and povidone-iodine could be a good substitute (or equal to) to paraffin gauze on acute laceration wounds. Honey is chosen because of its versatility and already well-known to be used as a chronic wound dressing. Povidone-iodine was chosen as another alternative because it is still one of the most used substance in rural area as a wound dressing, but there is not enough study to support the usage of this substance. Paraffin gauze was chosen as a representative of modern wound dressing because it fulfilled the standard of wound dressing on acute wound, which is non-adherent and also moist.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jan 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 29, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2018
CompletedAugust 29, 2018
August 1, 2018
5 months
August 16, 2018
August 27, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wound healing time
Measured by days, when was all of the sutures completely removed and the wound is completely approximated. We followed the guideline from American Academy of Family Physicians for timing for suture removal, so we will not remove the suture before the recommended time
28 days/4 weeks; day 0 is the day of the event. The participants was chosen very carefully by our strict eligibility criteria, so the investigators expect that the wound will heal on acute period
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Infection
28 days/4 weeks; day 0 is the day of the event. The participants was chosen very carefully by our strict eligibility criteria, so the investigators expect that the wound will heal on acute period
Pain level
28 days/4 weeks; day 0 is the day of the event. The participants was chosen very carefully by our strict eligibility criteria, so the investigators expect that the wound will heal on acute period
Itchiness
28 days/4 weeks; day 0 is the day of the event. The participants was chosen very carefully by our strict eligibility criteria, so the investigators expect that the wound will heal on acute period
Odor
28 days/4 weeks; day 0 is the day of the event. The participants was chosen very carefully by our strict eligibility criteria, so the investigators expect that the wound will heal on acute period
Exudate
28 days/4 weeks; day 0 is the day of the event. The participants was chosen very carefully by our strict eligibility criteria, so the investigators expect that the wound will heal on acute period
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Honey
EXPERIMENTAL0.05 cc of honey (Madu Nusantara®) per 1 cm of laceration, given every predetermined wound care schedule
Povidone-iodine
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.05 cc of povidone-iodine per 1 cm of laceration, given every predetermined wound care schedule
Paraffin gauze
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1 layer of paraffin gauze, given every predetermined wound care schedule
Interventions
Substance is given topically after the wound has been sutured
Substance is given topically after the wound has been sutured
Substance is given topically after the wound has been sutured
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Every patient that admits to the emergency department with:
- An acute open traumatic wound
- Agrees to a voluntary agreement for informed consent
- To be treated in an outpatient setting
You may not qualify if:
- Human factor:
- Patient under the age of 10 and over 60 years old
- Systemic conditions (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, liver' kidney disease)
- Signs of infection
- Consuming steroids and / or antibiotics
- History of keloid
- History of drug and / or alcohol abuse
- Under treatment for chemotherapy or immunocompromised
- Pregnant
- History of allergy towards amoxicillin and / or ibuprofen
- Wound factor:
- Acute Open Traumatic Wound that has occured after than 12 hours of admittance to the emergency department
- Open fracture
- Suspicion of contamination from the mechanism of attaining the wound (human or animal bite, body fluids such as faeces, saliva, urine, sperm, or vaginal secretion)
- Penetration trauma (stab wound, gunshot wound, or a joint-affected wound)
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
S.K. Lerik General Hospital
Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara, 85227, Indonesia
Related Publications (32)
Fife CE, Carter MJ. Wound Care Outcomes and Associated Cost Among Patients Treated in US Outpatient Wound Centers: Data From the US Wound Registry. Wounds. 2012 Jan;24(1):10-7.
PMID: 25875947BACKGROUNDSood A, Granick MS, Tomaselli NL. Wound Dressings and Comparative Effectiveness Data. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014 Aug 1;3(8):511-529. doi: 10.1089/wound.2012.0401.
PMID: 25126472BACKGROUNDDhivya S, Padma VV, Santhini E. Wound dressings - a review. Biomedicine (Taipei). 2015 Dec;5(4):22. doi: 10.7603/s40681-015-0022-9. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
PMID: 26615539BACKGROUNDIndonesia | Data. Indonesia [Internet]. 2017 [updated 2017; cited 2017 Jun 18]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/country/indonesia.
BACKGROUNDTrihono. Riset Kesehatan Dasar: Riskesdas 2013. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan RI.
BACKGROUNDProduk Domestik Bruto - Analisis PDB Per Kapita Indonesia | Indonesia Investments. Produk Domestik Bruto Indonesia [Internet]. 2017 [updated 2017 Feb 6; cited 2017 Jun 18]. Available from: https://www.indonesia-investments.com/id/keuangan/angka-ekonomi-makro/produk-domestik-bruto-indonesia/item253.
BACKGROUNDBadan Pusat Statistik. Upah Minimum Regional/Provinsi (UMR/UMP) dan rata-rata Nasional per tahun (Dalam Rupiah), 1997-2016 [Internet]. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik; 2016 [updated 2016; cited 2017 Jun 18]. Available from: https://www.bps.go.id/linkTableDinamis/view/id/917
BACKGROUNDMoeloek NF. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 52 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Tarif Pelayanan Kesehatan Dalam Penyelenggaraan Program Jaminan Kesehatan. Jakarta: Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2017. pg. 6.
BACKGROUNDHemani ML, Lepor H. Skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infection: which agent is best? Rev Urol. 2009 Fall;11(4):190-5.
PMID: 20111631BACKGROUNDAngel DE, Morey P, Storer JG, Mwipatayi BP. The great debate over iodine in wound care continues: a review of the literature. Wound Pract Res. 2008;16(1):6-21.
BACKGROUNDJull AB, Walker N, Deshpande S. Honey as a topical treatment for wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD005083. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005083.pub3.
PMID: 23450557BACKGROUNDSaikaly SK, Khachemoune A. Honey and Wound Healing: An Update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017 Apr;18(2):237-251. doi: 10.1007/s40257-016-0247-8.
PMID: 28063093BACKGROUNDNevas M, Lindstrom M, Horman A, Keto-Timonen R, Korkeala H. Contamination routes of Clostridium botulinum in the honey production environment. Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jun;8(6):1085-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.001000.x.
PMID: 16689729BACKGROUNDShukrimi A, Sulaiman AR, Halim AY, Azril A. A comparative study between honey and povidone iodine as dressing solution for Wagner type II diabetic foot ulcers. Med J Malaysia. 2008 Mar;63(1):44-6.
PMID: 18935732BACKGROUNDGulati S, Qureshi A, Srivastava A, Kataria K, Kumar P, Ji AB. A Prospective Randomized Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Honey Dressing vs. Povidone Iodine Dressing in Chronic Wound Healing. Indian J Surg. 2014 Jun;76(3):193-8. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0682-6. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
PMID: 25177115BACKGROUNDLi J, Chen J, Kirsner R. Pathophysiology of acute wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 2007 Jan-Feb;25(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.09.007.
PMID: 17276196BACKGROUNDThorne CHM, Gurtner GC, Chung K, Gosain A Mehrara B, Rubin P, Spear SL Grabb and Smith's Plastic Surgery. 7th ed.. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA. Pg. 14-17.
BACKGROUNDSiddiqui AR, Bernstein JM. Chronic wound infection: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2010 Sep-Oct;28(5):519-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.03.009.
PMID: 20797512BACKGROUNDKumar V, Cotran RS, Robbin ST. Robbins basic Pathology. 7th ed. Philadelphia, 2003, Saunders.
BACKGROUNDSinger AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1999 Sep 2;341(10):738-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909023411006. No abstract available.
PMID: 10471461BACKGROUNDTroxler M, Vowden K, Vowden P. 2006. Integrating Adjunctive Therapy into Practice: The Importance of Recofnising 'Hard-to-Heal' Wounds.
BACKGROUNDLazarus GS, Cooper DM, Knighton DR, Percoraro RE, Rodeheaver G, Robson MC. Definitions and guidelines for assessment of wounds and evaluation of healing. Wound Repair Regen. 1994 Jul;2(3):165-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1994.20305.x.
PMID: 17156107BACKGROUNDFonseca JA et al. Medscape Education. Burn Wound Infections. [Online]. Updated May 25, 2016. Available at http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/213595-overview. Accessed June 16, 2017.
BACKGROUNDNicks BA, Ayello EA, Woo K, Nitzki-George D, Sibbald RG. Acute wound management: revisiting the approach to assessment, irrigation, and closure considerations. Int J Emerg Med. 2010 Aug 27;3(4):399-407. doi: 10.1007/s12245-010-0217-5.
PMID: 21373312BACKGROUNDYaghoobi R, Kazerouni A, Kazerouni O. Evidence for Clinical Use of Honey in Wound Healing as an Anti-bacterial, Anti-inflammatory Anti-oxidant and Anti-viral Agent: A Review. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2013 Aug;8(3):100-4. doi: 10.17795/jjnpp-9487. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
PMID: 24624197BACKGROUNDKaufman T, Eichenlaub EH, Angel MF, Levin M, Futrell JW. Topical acidification promotes healing of experimental deep partial thickness skin burns: a randomized double-blind preliminary study. Burns Incl Therm Inj. 1985 Dec;12(2):84-90. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(85)90032-4.
PMID: 4092157BACKGROUNDGreener B, Hughes AA, Bannister NP, Douglass J. Proteases and pH in chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2005 Feb;14(2):59-61. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2005.14.2.26739. No abstract available.
PMID: 15739652BACKGROUNDBiswas A, Bharara M, Hurst C, Gruessner R, Armstrong D, Rilo H. Use of sugar on the healing of diabetic ulcers: a review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Sep 1;4(5):1139-45. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400512.
PMID: 20920433BACKGROUNDMolan P, Rhodes T. Honey: A Biologic Wound Dressing. Wounds. 2015 Jun;27(6):141-51.
PMID: 26061489BACKGROUNDPortenoy RK, Tanner RM. Pain Management: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996.
BACKGROUNDBijur PE, Latimer CT, Gallagher EJ. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;10(4):390-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01355.x.
PMID: 12670856BACKGROUNDWilliamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.
PMID: 16000093BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kevin L Suryadinata, MD
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants do not know which intervention substance they have been assigned to
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Kevin Leonard Suryadinata, MD. Principal Investigator and General Practitioner of S.K. Lerik General Hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 16, 2018
First Posted
August 21, 2018
Study Start
January 29, 2018
Primary Completion
June 30, 2018
Study Completion
June 30, 2018
Last Updated
August 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share