A Study of the Safety and Effect of Repeated Administration of G-CSF on Hot Flashes in Postmenopausal Women
Study to Assess the Safety and Effect of Repeated Administration of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF; Filgrastim) on Hot Flashes and Other Vasomotor Symptoms of Menopause in Postmenopausal Women
2 other identifiers
interventional
61
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of repeated administration of G-CSF for the treatment of hot flashes and vasomotor symptoms in women with naturally-occurring or surgically induced menopause. G-CSF will be administered three times at 28 day intervals to postmenopausal women, ages 40 to 65, suffering at least 49 moderate to severe hot flashes per week.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Aug 2018
Typical duration for phase_1
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 22, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 28, 2023
CompletedNovember 28, 2023
November 1, 2023
3.5 years
July 30, 2018
May 31, 2023
November 3, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence, including the exacerbation of a pre-existing condition, in a subject or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product. This does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution. This includes any experience that results in death; is acutely life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongs the existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of ability to conduct normal life functions; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
From first dose date up to 30 days after last dose (up to 16 weeks)
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Counts 24 Hours After Administration of G-CSF or Placebo on Day 0
Change from baseline in white blood cell counts 24 hours after administration of G-CSF or placebo on day 0. Blood samples were collected 24 hours after adminstration of G-CSF on day 0.
Baseline and day 1
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Counts 24 Hours After Administration of G-CSF or Placebo on Day 28
Change from baseline in white blood cell counts 24 hours after administration of G-CSF or placebo on day 28. Blood samples were collected 24 hours after adminstration of G-CSF on day 28.
Baseline and day 29
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Counts 24 Hours After Administration of G-CSF or Placebo on Day 56.
Change from baseline in white blood cell counts 24 hours after administration of G-CSF or placebo on day 56. Blood samples were collected 24 hours after adminstration of G-CSF on day 56.
Baseline and day 57
Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Counts on Day 84 (28 Days After Last Administration of G-CSF or Palcebo)
Change from baseline in white blood cell counts on day 84. Blood samples were collected 24 hours after adminstration of G-CSF on day 84.
Baseline and day 84
Change From Baseline in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe (M+S) Hot Flashes at Week 4
The frequency of moderate to severe hot flashes was the number of moderate to severe hot flashes per 24 hours. A daily frequency per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. All subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug are included in this subset. Subjects are analysed according to the randomized treatment group regardless of treatment received.
Baseline and week 4
Change From Baseline in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe (M+S) Hot Flashes at Week 12
The frequency of moderate to severe hot flashes was the number of moderate to severe hot flashes per 24 hours. A daily frequency per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. All subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug are included in this subset. Subjects are analysed according to the randomized treatment group regardless of treatment received.
Baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in the Mean Composite Daily Severity of Hot Flashes (CDS) at Week 4
CDS (Composite Daily Hot Flash Severity) was calculated as follows: \[(number of mild hot flashes per day x 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes per day x 2) + (number of severe hot flashes per day x 3)\]. A daily frequency per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. All subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug are included in this subset. Subjects are analysed according to the randomized treatment group regardless of treatment received.
Baseline and week 4
Change From Baseline in the Mean Composite Daily Severity of Hot Flashes (CDS) at Week 12
CDS (Composite Daily Hot Flash Severity) was calculated as follows: \[(number of mild hot flashes per day x 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes per day x 2) + (number of severe hot flashes per day x 3)\]. A daily frequency per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. All subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug are included in this subset. Subjects are analysed according to the randomized treatment group regardless of treatment received.
Baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Severity of Hot Flashes (HFSS) at Week 4
HFSS (Daily Hot Flash Severity Score) was calculated as follows: \[(number of mild hot flashes per day x 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes per day x 2) + (number of severe hot flashes per day x 3)\]/daily total hot flashes), where total hot flashes (THF) = number of daily mild, moderate, and severe hot flashes. A daily severity score per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. All subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug are included in this subset. Subjects are analysed according to the randomized treatment group regardless of treatment received.
Baseline and week 4
Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Severity of Hot Flashes (HFSS) at Week 12
HFSS (Daily Hot Flash Severity Score) was calculated as follows: \[(number of mild hot flashes per day x 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes per day x 2) + (number of severe hot flashes per day x 3)\]/daily total hot flashes), where total hot flashes (THF) = number of daily mild, moderate, and severe hot flashes. A daily severity score per week was derived by taking the mean of the data over 7 days. All subjects who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug are included in this subset. Subjects are analysed according to the randomized treatment group regardless of treatment received.
Baseline and week 12
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Number of Subjects Achieving >50% Reduction in the Mean Frequency of Moderate and Severe (M+S) Hot Flashes up to Week 12
Weeks 1-12
Number of Subjects Acheiving >50% Reduction in the Mean Composite Daily Hot Flash Severity (CDS) up to Week 12
Weeks 1-12
Number of Subjects Acheiving >0.30 Reduction in the Mean Daily Hot Flash Severity Score (HFSS) up to Week 12
Weeks 1-12
Percent Change in M+S at 12 Weeks in Demographic Subgroups
Baseline and Week 12
Net Change in HFSS at 12 Weeks in Demographic Subgroups
Baseline and Week 12
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Experimental: G-CSF
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention: G-CSF given by subcutaneous injection repeated 3 times (Days 0, 28, 56) Other name: Filgrastim
Comparator: Placebo/Saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORIntervention: Placebo/saline given by subcutaneous injection repeated 3 times (Days 0, 28, 56) Other name: Saline
Interventions
G-CSF injected subcutaneously 3 times (Days 0, 28, 56)
Placebo/saline injected subcutaneously 3 times (Days 0, 28, 56)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female, aged 49 to 65 for natural postmenopausal or aged 40 to 65 for surgical postmenopausal
- Body Mass Index (BMI) 18 to 35
- At least 7 moderate to severe hot flashes per day on average (or at least 49 moderate to severe hot flashes per week)
- Naturally postmenopausal or surgically postmenopausal women:
- Naturally postmenopausal is defined as having no menstrual periods for at least 12 months prior to study entry; with a biochemical criteria of menopause (FSH \>40 IU/L)
- Surgically postmenopausal is defined as at least 3 months after documented bilateral salpingo oophorectomy
- Normal pelvic exam and pap smear within 2 years
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Radiation or chemotherapy-induced (including gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist) menopause
- Prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy for cancer
- Prior diagnosis of hematologic malignancy
- Type 1 diabetics or Type 2 diabetics with HbA1c \> 7.0%
- Use of hormone replacement therapy or oral contraceptives within the past three months
- Use of alternative or complementary medicines or herbs for menopausal symptoms within 30 days (refer to Appendix 2)
- Use of any selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) within 30 days
- Use of selective estrogen receptor modulators within 30 days
- Use of gabapentin within 30 days
- Use of clonidine within 30 days
- Use of megestrol acetate (Megace) within 30 days
- Use of, prescription corticosteroids within 30 days (nasal or other inhaled corticosteroids and over-the-counter (OTC) hydrocortisone ointment or cream excepted)
- Current use of lithium therapy (related to possible risk of G-CSF)
- History (in the past year) or presence of drug or alcohol use which, in the opinion of the Investigator, might compromise the study or confound the study results
- History of use of any anti-inflammatory biologics
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MenoGeniX, Inc.lead
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Site 2
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Site 1
Denver, Colorado, 80209, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Debra Duke
- Organization
- MenoGeniX
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Richard C Duke, PhD
MenoGeniX, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 30, 2018
First Posted
August 21, 2018
Study Start
August 6, 2018
Primary Completion
January 21, 2022
Study Completion
February 22, 2022
Last Updated
November 28, 2023
Results First Posted
November 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share