NCT03639558

Brief Summary

This is a randomised controlled trial comparing haloperidol + promethazine versus haloperidol + promethazine + chlorpromazine for agitated patients in the emergency department.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 15, 2018

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 21, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 28, 2018

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2019

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 7, 2019

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 14, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

June 14, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

August 15, 2018

Results QC Date

March 16, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants According to the Time Taken for Aggressive Behaviour to Change to Calm and Tranquil

    Patient no longer exhibiting aggressive behavior both verbal and physical post intervention treatment. A primary measure of outcome form will contain a Calm or Tranquil column followed by four rows: 20 mins, 40 mins, 60 mins and 120 mins post intervention medication. The boxes would be ticked depending if the patient meets the primary measure of outcome within the time frame provided.

    20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes post intervention treatment

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Time Taken for Patient to Fall Asleep Post Intervention

    20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes post intervention treatment

  • Time Patient Was Placed in Straitjacket/Restraint Post Intervention Treatment

    20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes post intervention treatment

  • Time Noted Where Important Adverse Effects Occurred Post Intervention

    20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes post intervention treatment

  • Time Patient Left the Ward Against Medical Advice During the Time Period After the Intervention Was Administered.

    20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes post intervention treatment

Study Arms (2)

Haloperidol + Promethazine + Chlorpromazine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Haloperidol + Promethazine + Chlorpromazine are all psychiatric drugs that have been well tested. The combination of these 3 drugs, however, have never been randomised.

Drug: Haloperidol + Promethazine + Chlorpromazine

Haloperidol + Promethazine

EXPERIMENTAL

Haloperidol + Promethazine are both psychiatric drugs with antipsychotic and calming properties.

Drug: Haloperidol + Promethazine

Interventions

This is the usual treatment given by this hospital during an aggressive psychiatric episode.

Also known as: HPC
Haloperidol + Promethazine + Chlorpromazine

This is the second most used psycho-pharmacological combination used in this hospital during an aggressive psychiatric episode.

Also known as: HP
Haloperidol + Promethazine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 64 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient will be eligible if (1) requiring emergency acute intramuscular sedation because of disturbed and dangerous behaviour and (2) if the clinician is uncertain of the benefits between haloperidol plus promethazine vs haloperidol plus promethazine plus chlorpromazine.
  • Gender - both male and female
  • Age (18-64)
  • Clinician is unaware on the effects of either treatment interventions

You may not qualify if:

  • If the clinician KNOWS one treatment has benefit over another for a particular person
  • If the clinician is aware of a contra-indication of one of the treatments
  • If there is an Advanced Directive expressing a wish for one or other, or another treatment in the emergency setting.
  • If the clinician does not want to undertake for both personal and professional reasons.
  • If the participant is known to be allergic to one or more of the interventions
  • Already randomized
  • Already sedated
  • Accompanying person (Friend/Family/Police Officer) refuses patient trial entry

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Hôpital Psychiatrique De La Croix

Beirut, Jal L Dib, Lebanon

Location

Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross

Beirut, Lebanon

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Dib JE, Adams CE, Ikdais WH, Atallah E, Yaacoub HE, Merheb TJ, Kazour F, Tahan F, Haddad G, Zoghbi M, Azar J, Haddad C, Hallit S. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of haloperidol plus promethazine plus chlorpromazine versus haloperidol plus promethazine for rapid tranquilisation for agitated psychiatric patients in the emergency setting (TREC-Lebanon). F1000Res. 2019 Aug 15;8:1442. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19933.1. eCollection 2019.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AggressionPsychomotor Agitation

Interventions

HaloperidolPromethazineChlorpromazine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Aberrant Motor Behavior in DementiaBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorSocial BehaviorDyskinesiasNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesPsychomotor DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ButyrophenonesKetonesOrganic ChemicalsPropylaminesAminesPhenothiazinesSulfur CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

Possible limitations for this trial are that there are no Emergency Departments; therefore residents must always carry the TREC envelopes at all times, increasing the risk for error (i.e. misplacing envelope, using wrong envelope, etc.). Despite the limitation, the chances of error remain low due to the small sample size of 100.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Joseph Dib
Organization
University of Nottingham/Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Trial Research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2018

First Posted

August 21, 2018

Study Start

August 28, 2018

Primary Completion

July 1, 2019

Study Completion

July 7, 2019

Last Updated

June 14, 2022

Results First Posted

June 14, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations