NCT03639389

Brief Summary

Prostate cancer is the commonest cancer form in men in Northern Europe. Management of the cancer often includes surgical removal of the primary tumor. In the last 5-10 years, robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has become common. Good pain relief is central to early mobilization and greater patient satisfaction. Randomized controlled studies on pain relief following RALP are few and the role of spinal analgesia in pain management following robotic surgery has not been described. Techniques available for pain relief following RALP include spinal anesthesia with or without opiates, intravenous analgesia with morphine or a multimodal pain management technique using a combination of several analgesics. Spinal anesthesia and analgesia reduces the surgical stress and inflammatory response following laparoscopic colorectal surgery and may offer similar benefit even during RALP. Early perioperative complications may cause postoperative morbidity following robotic surgery, and sometimes delay home discharge. Since all robotic operations in the pelvic region are performed in a deep Trendelenberg position, this can even have negative consequences for the heart, brain and the lungs. Cardiac complications in the form of minimal cardiac injury or mild heart failure have not been previously studied following RALP. Additionally, patients are sometimes delirious in the early postoperative period following RALP. The precise cause for this remains unclear and may be related to pain, cognitive dysfunction or an urge to pass urine despite a urinary catheter. In addition to good postoperative pain relief, early postoperative mobilization and home discharge are important milestones in recovery of full function following major surgery. With improvement in surgical technique, the time has come to evaluate if RALP can be performed on an ambulatory basis. The main aims of this study are:

  1. 1.Can RALP be performed on an ambulatory basis and patients ready to be discharged home at 8 pm?
  2. 2.To determine if spinal anesthesia reduces pre-discharge pain intensity, stress response and other perioperative side effects.
  3. 3.Is sufentanil or fentanyl the analgesic of choice when administered spinally together with bupivacaine as an analgesic.
  4. 4.To determine the frequency and severity of cardiac and respiratory complications in the steep Trendelenberg position during RALP.
  5. 5.To assess the quality of recovery, quality of life and activities of daily living following ambulatory RALP?

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
211

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 6, 2018

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 21, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2019

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 29, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 29, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

June 22, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

August 6, 2018

Last Update Submit

June 18, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Robot assisted surgeryProstatectomySpinal anesthesiaPostoperative painHome discharge

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of patients ready for home discharge at 8 pm after surgery

    Number of patients ready to be discharged home after surgery when using a standardized home-discharge criteria

    With 12 h of surgery start

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Pain intensity

    7 days postoperatively

  • Stress markers in plasma

    24 hours

  • Quality of Recovery

    3 days postoperatively

  • Quality of life after surgery

    30 days postoperatively

  • Amount (mg) of morphine administered as rescue analgesic at 12 and at 24 h

    At 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Analgesics, multimodal

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Combination of paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and morphine as analgesics

Drug: Analgesics

Bupivacaine

EXPERIMENTAL

Spinal anesthetic with bupivacain + fentanyl/sufentanil

Drug: Bupivacaine

Interventions

Spinal anesthesia with a combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl or sufentanil

Also known as: Marcain spinal
Bupivacaine

Combination of paracetamol + non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug + morphine to all patients

Also known as: paracetamol + NSAID + morphine
Analgesics, multimodal

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 85 Years
Sexmale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsOnly males undergo this procedure
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA 1-3
  • Elective robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy Karolinska Hospital

You may not qualify if:

  • Communication limitations (language, mental)
  • Chronic opiate use
  • Allergy to NSAID
  • Coagulation problems preventing administration of spinal analgesia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Karolinska Hospital, Solna

Stockholm, 17176, Sweden

Location

Capio St Görans Hospital

Stockholm, Sweden

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

BupivacaineAnalgesicsAcetaminophenAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalMorphine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesSensory System AgentsPeripheral Nervous System AgentsPhysiological Effects of DrugsPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesCentral Nervous System AgentsTherapeutic UsesAcetanilidesAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntirheumatic AgentsMorphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Håkan Björne, MD, PhD

    Karolinska Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome observer blinded to method of analgesia (spinal/no-spinal)
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, randomized, observer-blinded
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2018

First Posted

August 21, 2018

Study Start

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion

March 29, 2022

Study Completion

March 29, 2022

Last Updated

June 22, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Locations