Comparing Effectiveness of Oral Misoprostal for Cervical Priming in Hysteroscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Research objective To compare effectiveness of oral Misoprostal for cervical priming in premenopausal women underwent to diagnostic hysteroscopy Research hypothesis: Null hypothesis Effectiveness of oral misoprostal for cervical priming in premenopausal women underwent to diagnostic hysteroscopy is not different from placebo Alternative hypothesis: : Oral Misoprostal for cervical priming in Premenopausal women underwent to diagnostic hysteroscopy is better than placebo
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2018
CompletedOctober 22, 2020
June 1, 2018
3 months
June 1, 2018
October 20, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
initial cervical diameter
The initial hedgar dilator number which can easily insert through cervix
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Misoprostal group
EXPERIMENTALPatients were added oral Misoprostal 200 mcg 2 tab per oral 3 hour before hysteroscopy
Placebo group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients were take placebo 2 tab per oral 3 hour before hysteroscopy
Interventions
patient takes 2 tab of 200 mcg of Misoprostal 3 hr before hysteroscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Premenopausal women
- Patients have following indication for diagnosis hysteroscopy
- Abnormal uterine bleeding
- Unexplained infertility
- Recurrent pregnancy loss
- Chronic pelvic pain
- Late postpartum hemorrhage
- Patients provided written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Postmenopausal women
- Patients who have contraindication for Misoprostal as following
- Allergic to Misoprostal
- Medical illnesses such as cardiovascular diseases, Asthma, Renal disease
- Patients who have contraindication for Hysteroscopoy as following
- Pregnant women
- Pelvic inflammatory disease
- Infection at cervix and vagina
- Cervical cancer
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rajavithi Hospital
Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2018
First Posted
August 20, 2018
Study Start
September 30, 2018
Primary Completion
December 30, 2018
Study Completion
December 30, 2018
Last Updated
October 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2018-06