Spectral Computed Tomography With Photon Counting Detector of Brain and Vessels.
1 other identifier
observational
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Primary purpose of the study is to show wether computed tomography with photon counting detector has a diagnostic image quality as good as, or better than classic computed tomography in investigations concerning stroke work-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedFebruary 24, 2021
February 1, 2021
4 years
March 16, 2018
February 23, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Equal or better images vs classic computed tomography.
Are images taken with photon counting detector of brain and vessels worse, equal or better in comparison with ordinary computed tomography. Comparison of images with kernals (or algorithms) for bone and soft tissue at the level of the carotid plaque, inner ear/hindbrain and nucl lentiformis. Comparison of the ability of the spectral function - the ability to separate iodine, soft tissue and calcifications- if applicable. The comparison will be done as a grading (better, equal or worse) regarding the different kernals compared to routine CT exams from the same patient. Significance of difference between proportions with thh use of Fisher's exact test or Pearson's χ2 as appropriate. Evaluation with Cohen´s kappa with 95% CI to assess the level of inter-reader agreement
During 2020
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic information in comparison with MRI
During 2020
Interventions
No intervention is performed, just a CT with a new detector and comparison with the same patients older image.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients in the ordinary stroke workup that do both CT brain and CTA of neck/brain vessel will be asked if we can ask them to participate in this study. Of the ones with carotid stenosis 30% or more we will ask patients to participate in this study.
You may qualify if:
- Brain exam with CT and/or CT neck/brain vessels prior to this study. Regarding neck-vessel imaging - carotid stenosis of 30% or more. Normal kidney function.
You may not qualify if:
- no contraindications to iodine contrast for neck-vessel imaging with contrast.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2018
First Posted
August 20, 2018
Study Start
January 11, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
February 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
After the study is completed, contact the Principal Investigator for (anonymous) data