Effect of Recruitment Maneuvers Plus Optimal PEEP Versus Optimal PEEP Alone in One Lung Ventilation
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The intraoperative driving pressure (∆P) has been recently identified as the greater independent predictor of postoperative pulmonary complications after one lung ventilation (OLV). The application of a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level of 5 or 10 cmH2O has been shown to reduce the ∆P and the V/Q mismatch (Spadaro 2017); however, the "optimal" PEEP level able to minimize the ∆P may change significantly across patients. The aim of this study is to describe the optimal PEEP levels in patients undergoing thoracic surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2018
CompletedJanuary 31, 2019
January 1, 2019
1.2 years
July 31, 2018
January 30, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pulmonary shunt, expressed as percentage, measured by ALPE system
20 minutes after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
intraoperative driving pressure, measured as plateau pressure - PEEP
20 minutes after intervention
Other Outcomes (1)
intraoperative oxygenation, measured as PaO2/FIO2 ratio
20 minutes after intervention
Study Arms (2)
PEEP group
EXPERIMENTALIn this group the a PEEP level will be added after 20 minutes from OLV. PEEP values will be chosen according to the best static compliance with an incremental trial (i.e. starting from ZEEP, the PEEP values will be increased in step of 2 cmH2O each until the best compliance is reached)
RM+PEEP group
EXPERIMENTALRecruitment maneuvers will be performed as follow Recruitment maneuvers 1. set FIO2 at 1.0 2. Ppeak limit at 45 cmH2O 3. Respiratory rate set at 6 4. I:E set at 1:1 5. Raise the VT at step of 2 ml/kg PBW until the Pplat is between 30-40 cmH2O 6. If the maximum VT is set without rasing the Pplat, raise PEEP 7. Allow three respiratory cycles with Pplat between 30 and 40 cmH2O 8. End of RM The recruitment manouvers will be performed after 20 minutes of OLV. At the end of the RM, the VT will be set back to 5 ml/kg while the PEEP will be chosen according to the best static compliance with a decremental trial (from 16 cmH2O, lowering PEEP with steps of 2 cmH2O each until the best compliance is reached).
Interventions
Recruitment manoeuvers will be performed as follow Recruitment manoeuvers 1. set FIO2 at 1.0 2. Ppeak limit at 45 cmH2O 3. Respiratory rate set at 6 4. I:E set at 1:1 5. Raise the VT at step of 2 ml/kg PBW until the Pplat is between 30-40 cmH2O 6. If the maximum VT is set without rasing the Pplat, raise PEEP 7. Allow three respiratory cycles with Pplat between 30 and 40 cmH2O 8. End of RM The recruitment manouvers will be performed after 20 minutes of OLV. At the end of the RM, the VT will be set back to 5 ml/kg while the PEEP will be chosen according to the best static compliance with a decremental trial (from 16 cmH2O, lowering PEEP with steps of 2 cmH2O each until the best compliance is reached).
In this group the a PEEP level will be added after 20 minutes from OLV. PEEP values will be chosen according to the best static compliance with an incremental trial (i.e. starting from ZEEP, the PEEP values will be increased in step of 2 cmH2O each until the best compliance is reached
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing VATS with OLV ≥2 hours
You may not qualify if:
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification) score ≥ 4
- severe chronic respiratory failure (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with GOLD stage 3 or 4
- preoperative hemoglobin less than 10 g ml-1
- hemodynamic instability (defined as a decrease in systolic arterial pressure of more than 20% from baseline),
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Università di Ferrara
Ferrara, 44121, Italy
Related Publications (2)
Spadaro S, Grasso S, Karbing DS, Fogagnolo A, Contoli M, Bollini G, Ragazzi R, Cinnella G, Verri M, Cavallesco NG, Rees SE, Volta CA. Physiologic Evaluation of Ventilation Perfusion Mismatch and Respiratory Mechanics at Different Positive End-expiratory Pressure in Patients Undergoing Protective One-lung Ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2018 Mar;128(3):531-538. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002011.
PMID: 29215365RESULTSpadaro S, Grasso S, Karbing DS, Santoro G, Cavallesco G, Maniscalco P, Murgolo F, Di Mussi R, Ragazzi R, Rees SE, Volta CA, Fogagnolo A. Physiological effects of two driving pressure-based methods to set positive end-expiratory pressure during one lung ventilation. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Oct;35(5):1149-1157. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00582-z. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
PMID: 32816177DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2018
First Posted
August 17, 2018
Study Start
August 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 30, 2018
Study Completion
October 30, 2018
Last Updated
January 31, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01