Evaluation of Stroke Patient Screening
1 other identifier
observational
845
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background and Rationale: Traditionally, stroke rehabilitation studies have been performed in stroke patients beyond the first one to three months poststroke \[Stinear et al. 2013; Veerbeek et al. 2014\]. Acknowledging that early stroke rehabilitation should be initiated soon after stroke onset to optimize stroke outcomes, it is has been stressed that stroke rehabilitation trials should be initiated within the first month \[Stinear 2013\]. Early stroke rehabilitation trials face difficulties regarding patient recruitment with corresponding low enrollment rates \[AVERT 2015; Winters 2015\]. Explanations are for example priority given to (sub)acute medical interventions, highly dynamic situation at a stroke unit, and a more rapid change in patients' abilities when compared to patients in later stages poststroke. With the low enrollment rates (\~7%), the generalizability of study results is questionable. Participant screening methods and procedures for research eligibility are part of the patient selection and recruitment process in clinical trials. However, no information is available regarding screening procedures and methods for these early initiated stroke rehabilitation trials, including reasons for not enrolling patients. This knowledge is essential to improve screening procedures and methods, in order to optimize patient enrollment and with that, increase the generalizability of study results. Objective: The objective of this project is to evaluate screening methods and procedures for stroke rehabilitation research. Study Design: Observational study
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 25, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 16, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2019
CompletedFebruary 7, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.8 years
July 24, 2018
February 5, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reasons why participants are not eligible for an early rehabilitation trial
The reasons for non-enrollment will be measured by counting, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the aRISE study
1 Day
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Enrolment rate
1 Month
Estimated personnel expenses in Swiss Francs for screening
1 Month
Eligibility Criteria
All stroke patients admitted to the University Hospital Zurich, Department of Neurology, Switzerland.
You may qualify if:
- First-ever unilateral ischemic stroke \<48 hours, confirmed by MRI-DWI and/or CT
- Age 18 years or older
- Able to follow one-staged commands
- NIHSS arm score ≥1
- Informed consent after participants' information
You may not qualify if:
- Modified Rankin Scale score \>2 before stroke
- Neurological or other diseases affecting the upper limb(s) before stroke
- Intravenous line in the upper limb(s) which limits assessment
- Contra-indications on ethical grounds
- Expected or known non-compliance to participate in the observational study, severe drug or/and alcohol abuse
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zürcher RehaZentrum Wald
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
Related Publications (5)
AVERT Trial Collaboration group. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):46-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60690-0. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
PMID: 25892679BACKGROUNDStinear C, Ackerley S, Byblow W. Rehabilitation is initiated early after stroke, but most motor rehabilitation trials are not: a systematic review. Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):2039-45. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000968. Epub 2013 May 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 23715959BACKGROUNDVeerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087987. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24505342BACKGROUNDWinters C, van Wegen EE, Daffertshofer A, Kwakkel G. Generalizability of the Proportional Recovery Model for the Upper Extremity After an Ischemic Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Aug;29(7):614-22. doi: 10.1177/1545968314562115. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
PMID: 25505223BACKGROUNDHeld JPO, van Duinen J, Luft AR, Veerbeek JM. Eligibility Screening for an Early Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation Study. Front Neurol. 2019 Jul 2;10:683. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00683. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31312170RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2018
First Posted
August 16, 2018
Study Start
September 25, 2017
Primary Completion
July 31, 2019
Study Completion
July 31, 2019
Last Updated
February 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share