Injection Techniques of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) for the Treatment of EFP (Cellulite)
A Phase 2A, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety and Different Injection Techniques of CCH for the Treatment of Edematous Fibrosclerotic Panniculopathy (EFP)
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of different injection techniques of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) for the treatment of adult women with mild, moderate or severe Edematous Fibrosclerotic Panniculopathy (commonly known as Cellulite).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Sep 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 16, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 18, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 24, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 24, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 7, 2023
CompletedSeptember 7, 2023
August 1, 2023
4 months
July 5, 2018
May 27, 2022
August 15, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Aesthetic Appearance Improvement Likert Scores by Treatment Region at Day 22
Aesthetic appearance improvement for each treatment area (buttocks or thighs) was assessed by a blinded central assessment, using a 5-point Likert scale with scores ranging from -1 to 3. Aesthetic improvement was scored as worse (-1), stayed the same (0), improved (1), much improved (2) and very much improved (3). The assessor evaluated the image at Day 22 in comparison with baseline and recorded the Likert score. Aesthetic appearance Likert scale scores were analyzed using linear mixed model with treatment arm, study visit, interaction of treatment arm and study visit as fixed effects. This model was fitted using the response for the average of left and right of treatment area (that is, average of left buttock and right buttock or average of left thigh and right thigh).
Day 22
Aesthetic Appearance Improvement Likert Scores by Treatment Region at Day 43
Aesthetic appearance improvement for each treatment area (buttocks or thighs) was assessed by a blinded central assessment, using a 5-point Likert scale with scores ranging from -1 to 3. Aesthetic improvement was scored as worse (-1), stayed the same (0), improved (1), much improved (2) and very much improved (3). The assessor evaluated the image at Day 43 in comparison with baseline and recorded the Likert score. Aesthetic appearance Likert scale scores were analyzed using linear mixed model with treatment arm, study visit, interaction of treatment arm and study visit as fixed effects. This model was fitted using the response for the average of left and right of treatment area (that is, average of left buttock and right buttock or average of left thigh and right thigh).
Day 43
Aesthetic Appearance Improvement Likert Scores by Treatment Region at Day 71
Aesthetic appearance improvement for each treatment area (buttocks or thighs) was assessed by a blinded central assessment, using a 5-point Likert scale with scores ranging from -1 to 3. Aesthetic improvement was scored as worse (-1), stayed the same (0), improved (1), much improved (2) and very much improved (3). The assessor evaluated the image at Day 71 in comparison with baseline and recorded the Likert score. Aesthetic appearance Likert scale scores were analyzed using linear mixed model with treatment arm, study visit, interaction of treatment arm and study visit as fixed effects. This model was fitted using the response for the average of left and right of treatment area (that is, average of left buttock and right buttock or average of left thigh and right thigh).
Day 71
Change From Baseline in Dimple Depth Depression (Hexsel CSS [B]) by Treatment Region at Day 22
Dimple depth depression for each treatment area was assessed by the Investigator using the Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (B). Dimple Depth Depression of Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (B) was assessed and graded as: no depression (0), superficial depressions (1), medium depth depressions (2) and deep depressions (3). A negative change in Hexsel CSS (B) from baseline indicated an improvement in depression depth. Change from Baseline in dimple depth depression of Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (B) was analyzed using linear mixed model with treatment arm, study visits, interaction of treatment arm and study visit as fixed effect. This model was fitted using the response for the average of left and right of treatment areas (that is, average of left buttock and right buttock; average of left thigh and right thigh)
Baseline, Day 22
Change From Baseline in Dimple Depth Depression (Hexsel CSS [B]) by Treatment Region at Day 43
Dimple depth depression for each treatment area was assessed by the Investigator using the Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (B). Dimple Depth Depression of Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (B) was assessed and graded as: no depression (0), superficial depressions (1), medium depth depressions (2) and deep depressions (3). A negative change in Hexsel CSS (B) from baseline indicated an improvement in depression depth. Change from Baseline in dimple depth depression of Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (B) was analyzed using linear mixed model with treatment arm, study visits, interaction of treatment arm and study visit as fixed effect. This model was fitted using the response for the average of left and right of treatment areas (that is, average of left buttock and right buttock; average of left thigh and right thigh)
Baseline, Day 43
Change From Baseline in Dimple Depth Depression (Hexsel CSS [B]) by Treatment Region at Day 71
Dimple depth depression for each treatment area was assessed by the Investigator using the Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (B). Dimple Depth Depression of Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (B) was assessed and graded as: no depression (0), superficial depressions (1), medium depth depressions (2) and deep depressions (3). A negative change in Hexsel CSS (B) from baseline indicated an improvement in depression depth. Change from Baseline in dimple depth depression of Hexsel Cellulite Severity Scale (B) was analyzed using linear mixed model with treatment arm, study visits, interaction of treatment arm and study visit as fixed effect. This model was fitted using the response for the average of left and right of treatment areas (that is, average of left buttock and right buttock; average of left thigh and right thigh)
Baseline, Day 71
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline of Dimple Volume by Treatment Region
Baseline, Day 22, Day 43, and Day 71
Study Arms (5)
Treatment I: CCH Shallow Injection, 3 Aliquots
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Treatment I, CCH will be injected subcutaneously while the participant lies in a prone position. Each injection will consist of a single skin injection of study drug administered as three 0.1 milliliters (mL) aliquots (for a total injection volume of 0.3 mL). During each treatment visit, 8 syringes (4 syringes per treatment area) will be prepared for dosing. Each syringe will contain 0.9 mL of CCH (3 injections in each syringe). Dose per participant per treatment visit = up to 1.68 milligrams (mg) of CCH (0.84 mg in each treatment area).
Treatment II: CCH Shallow Injection, 1 Aliquot
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Treatment II, CCH will be injected subcutaneously while the participant is in a prone position. Each injection will consist of a single skin injection of study drug administered as a single shallow injection of a 0.3 mL aliquot. During each treatment visit, 8 syringes (4 syringes per treatment area) will be prepared for dosing. Each syringe will contain 0.9 mL of CCH (3 injections in each syringe). Dose per participant per treatment visit = up to 1.68 mg of CCH (0.84 mg in each treatment area).
Treatment III: CCH Deep Injection, 1 Aliquot
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Treatment III, CCH will be injected subcutaneously while the participant is in a prone position. Each injection will consist of a single skin injection of study drug administered as a single deep injection of a 0.3 mL study drug aliquot. During each treatment visit, 8 syringes (4 syringes per treatment area) will be prepared for dosing. Each syringe will contain 0.9 mL of CCH (3 injections in each syringe). Dose per participant per treatment visit = up to 1.68 mg of CCH (0.84 mg in each treatment area).
Treatment IV: CCH Deep and Shallow Injections, 5 Aliquots
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Treatment IV, CCH will be injected subcutaneously while the participant lies in a prone position. Each injection will consist of a single skin injection of study drug administered as five 0.3 mL (for a total injection volume of 1.5 mL). During each treatment visit, 24 syringes (12 syringes per treatment area) will be prepared for dosing. Each syringe will contain 1.5 mL of CCH (5 aliquots of 0.3 mL, for each injection, in each syringe). Dose per participant per treatment visit = up to 1.68 mg of CCH (0.84 mg in each treatment area).
Treatment V: CCH Shallow Injections, 4 Aliquots
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Treatment V, CCH will be injected subcutaneously while the participant lies in a prone position. Each injection will receive a single skin injection of study drug administered as four 0.3 mL aliquots (for a total injection volume of 1.2 mL). During each treatment visit, 24 syringes (12 syringes per treatment area) will be prepared for dosing. Each syringe will contain 1.2 mL of CCH (4 aliquots of 0.3 mL each). Dose per participant per treatment visit = up to 1.68 mg of CCH (0.84 mg in each treatment area).
Interventions
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Endo) is developing collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) for the treatment of EFP. Because CCH is a proteinase that can hydrolyze the triple-helical region of collagen under physiological conditions, CCH has the potential to be effective in lysing sub-dermal collagen, such as those observed in the dermal septa, which are the underlying cause of the skin dimpling in women with Edematous Fibrosclerotic Panniculopathy (EFP). CCH targets the collagenase structural matrix (for example, dermal septa) at the site of injection and does not require systemic exposure to be effective.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- No participant will be assigned to treatment until all eligibility criteria have been satisfied. To qualify for the study a participant must:
- Be able to provide voluntary written informed consent prior to the initiation of any study specific procedures per the policy of the governing Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC).
- Be female and at least 18 years of age at the time of consent.
- Have evidence of cellulite in 2 bilateral treatment areas (defined as right and left buttocks or right and left posterolateral thighs) as assessed by the Investigator at the Screening visit, and fulfills the following requirements:
- has a score of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) as reported by the Investigator (CR-PCSS) in 2 treatment areas (two thighs or two buttocks) at the Screening Visit.
- has at least 2 dimples from each treatment area that:
- are isolated and separated by at least 5 centimeters (cm) from any other dimples.
- score 2 or 3 on the Hexsel depression scale.
- have dimple width: length ratio ≥ 0.5.
- Be willing to apply sunscreen to the dosing areas before each exposure to the sun while participating in the study (that is, screening through end of study).
- Be judged to be in good health, based upon the results of a medical history, physical examination, and laboratory profile at screening.
- Have a negative serum pregnancy test at the Screening Visit and negative urine pregnancy at Day 1 (before injection of study drug), be using an effective contraception method (for example, abstinence, intrauterine device, hormonal \[estrogen/progestin\] contraceptives, or double barrier control) for at least 1 menstrual cycle prior to study enrollment and through Day 71; or be menopausal defined as at least 12 months of amenorrhea in the absence of other biological or physiological causes (as determined by the Investigator), or be post-menopausal for at least 1 year, or be surgically sterile (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, bilateral tubal ligation).
- Be willing and able to comply with all protocol required study visits and assessments.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
- Is pregnant or is intending to become pregnant during the study.
- Is presently nursing/breastfeeding or providing breast milk.
- Has any of the following systemic conditions:
- Coagulation disorder.
- Evidence or history of malignancy (other than excised basal-cell carcinoma) unless there has been no recurrence in at least 5 years.
- History of keloidal scarring or abnormal wound healing.
- Concurrent diseases or conditions that might interfere with the conduct of the study, confound the interpretation of the study results, or endanger the participant's well-being.
- Evidence of clinically significant abnormalities on physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG), or clinical laboratory values.
- Has any of the following local conditions in the areas to be treated:
- History of lower extremity thrombosis or post-thrombosis syndrome.
- Vascular disorder (for example, varicose veins, telangiectasia).
- Inflammation or active infection.
- Severe skin laxity, flaccidity, and/or sagging.
- Active cutaneous alteration including rash, eczema, psoriasis, or skin cancer.
- +18 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Endo Clinical Trial Site #1
Coral Gables, Florida, 33146, United States
Endo Clinical Trial Site #5
Miami, Florida, 33137, United States
Endo Clinical Trial Site #2
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Endo Clinical Trial Site #4
New York, New York, 10022, United States
Endo Clinical Trial Site #3
New York, New York, 10065, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Operations
- Organization
- Endo Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
George Omburo
Endo Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2018
First Posted
August 16, 2018
Study Start
September 18, 2018
Primary Completion
January 24, 2019
Study Completion
January 24, 2019
Last Updated
September 7, 2023
Results First Posted
September 7, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP