NCT03632785

Brief Summary

Approximately 50% of coronary events occur in previously asymptomatic patients. Thus, the early detection of the individuals at higher risk became an important research target within the current cardiology. The various clinical scores used present a predictive accuracy for ischemic events, evaluated by the ROC curve, which ranges from 0.73 to 0, 79. Therefore, the introduction of new non-invasive techniques for the detection of atherosclerosis aims to allow a more adequate classification of risk. The development of radiological techniques, fundamentally coronary angiotomography of multiple detectors (CAMD) and electron beam computed tomography-EBCT‖, demonstrated that the degree of coronary calcification correlates with endothelial lesion and individual prognosis in the long term. Notably, the calcium score has a weak correlation with the severity of coronary stenosis per se, possibly due to variations in arterial remodeling due to coronary calcification. On the other hand, the CAMD allows the detection of a small magnitude atheromatous disease, not diagnosed clinically, nor by tests provoking ischemia, or even by coronary catheterization. The clinical relevance of the small magnitude atheromatous disease diagnosed by the ACMD and its correlation with plaque vulnerability markers, mainly platelet aggregation, vascular reactivity, and inflammation are still not well determined. This is a case and control study and we will enrolled 90 patients with low and medium risk of cardiovascular event whose cases should present discrete plaques in the CAMD e controls should present none plaque in coronary stenosis Coronary atherosclerotic disease often begins in the transition from childhood to adolescence, progressing slowly and quietly. Its clinical manifestation occurs in the majority of cases from the 4th decade of life. However, it is important to remember that necropsy studies conducted in the 1970s identified the presence of non-obstructive atherosclerotic plaques in the aorta of individuals from the second decade of life. From its first description to the present day, the subject has been deeply studied, providing reliable information on several mechanisms involved in atherogenesis, disease progression and plaque unstabilization, which may occur in a silent manner or lead to a clinical picture of unstable myocardial ischemic syndrome (UMIS). In this period, classic risk factors for coronary artery disease (age, sex, diabetes mellitus, systemic arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and smoking, among others) were described, and risk scores were developed that aid in the individual prediction of the probability of disease manifestation coronary artery disease (CAD). The most widespread of these scores is that developed from the population of Framingham, which was started in the United States of the same name after 1948. Subjects with no evidence of cardiovascular disease were followed prospectively with biannual evaluations. The data obtained allowed the elaboration of an algorithm of prediction of individual risk that is included in the most recent recommendations of evaluation of cardiovascular risk. However, these traditional clinical assessment scores tend to underestimate cardiovascular risk in some populations, especially in women and young individuals. In the global population, the various clinical scores used have a predictive accuracy for ischemic events, as assessed by the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79. In this way, the concept of "detection interval" is proposed. Defined by the difference between cases of coronary disease or cardiovascular events detected and the actual total prevalence of atherosclerotic disease in the population, such detection interval opens a new field for the introduction of new non-invasive atherosclerosis investigation techniques. Taking into account that approximately 50% of coronary events occur in previously asymptomatic patients, the early detection of these individuals at greater risk has become an important research target within the current cardiology. More recently, the development of radiologic techniques, fundamentally coronary angiography of multiple detectors (CAMD) and electron beam computed tomography (EBCT), have demonstrated that the degree of coronary calcification correlates with endothelial lesion and individual prognosis in the long term, allowing to refine the clinical classification of a patient's risk for a greater or lesser chance of fatal and non-fatal events. Notably, the calcium score has a weak correlation with the severity of coronary stenosis per se, possibly due to variations in the arterial remodeling due to coronary calcification. On the other hand, calcification of the coronary arteries is known to be associated with lower myocardial blood flow even in the absence of significant stenosis. This means that calcification is not merely a marker of obstructive coronary disease and may predispos

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 27, 2017

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 5, 2018

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 15, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 10, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

March 20, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

August 5, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 17, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

PlateletCoronary stenosisCoronary angiography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Platelet aggregation by VerifyNow System - P2Y12®

    Comparing platelet aggregation by VerifyNow System - P2Y12® (An equipment from Accriva Diagnostics that evaluates platelet aggregation) in case and control groups.

    1 day

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Platelet aggregation by Multiplate-ADP®, Multiplate-ASPI®

    1day

  • Endothelial function

    1 day

  • Platelet-reticulated

    1day

  • Inflammatory activity

    1day

Other Outcomes (5)

  • Genetic polymorphisms

    1day

  • Transport of lipids to HDL

    1 day

  • Correlate results

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

  • +2 more other outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients older than 18 years, male and female with low and medium risk of cardiovascular disease without atherosclerotic disease manifest.

You may qualify if:

  • Low or Medium Risk of cardiovascular disease assessed by the Framingham criteria;
  • That agrees to sign the Consent Form;
  • Absence of known atherosclerotic disease;
  • Patients in the case group should additionally present discrete plaques (s) evaluated by coronary angiotomography of multiple detectors (CAMD). Patients in the control group should be absent from any coronary atherosclerotic process to CAMD.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known atherosclerotic disease manifest;
  • Previous acute coronary syndrome (ACS);
  • Use of antiplatelet agents and / or anticoagulants;
  • Use of NSAIDs and/or corticosteroids
  • Known platelet dysfunction or platelets \<100,000 / μL or\> 450,000 / μL
  • Hematocrit \<33% and \> 52%
  • Hematological diseases;
  • Liver disease;
  • Known malignant neoplasm;
  • Refusal to sign free and informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

José Carlos Nicolau

São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-900, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (22)

  • Lavi S, Bae JH, Rihal CS, Prasad A, Barsness GW, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR Jr, Lerman A. Segmental coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with minimal atherosclerosis is associated with necrotic core plaques. Heart. 2009 Sep;95(18):1525-30. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.166017. Epub 2009 Jun 3.

    PMID: 19497916BACKGROUND
  • Deanfield JE, Halcox JP, Rabelink TJ. Endothelial function and dysfunction: testing and clinical relevance. Circulation. 2007 Mar 13;115(10):1285-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.652859. No abstract available.

  • Ross R, Harker L. Hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. Science. 1976 Sep 17;193(4258):1094-100. doi: 10.1126/science.822515.

  • Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998 May 12;97(18):1837-47. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.18.1837.

  • Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, Benjamin EJ, Budoff MJ, Fayad ZA, Foster E, Hlatky MA, Hodgson JM, Kushner FG, Lauer MS, Shaw LJ, Smith SC Jr, Taylor AJ, Weintraub WS, Wenger NK, Jacobs AK, Smith SC Jr, Anderson JL, Albert N, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Guyton RA, Halperin JL, Hochman JS, Kushner FG, Nishimura R, Ohman EM, Page RL, Stevenson WG, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Dec 14;56(25):e50-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.001. No abstract available.

  • Nasir K, Michos ED, Blumenthal RS, Raggi P. Detection of high-risk young adults and women by coronary calcium and National Cholesterol Education Program Panel III guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Nov 15;46(10):1931-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.052. Epub 2005 Oct 20.

  • Akosah KO, Schaper A, Cogbill C, Schoenfeld P. Preventing myocardial infarction in the young adult in the first place: how do the National Cholesterol Education Panel III guidelines perform? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 May 7;41(9):1475-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00187-6.

  • Kappagoda CT, Amsterdam EA. Assessment of risk for developing coronary heart disease in asymptomatic individuals. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(4):207-19. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181af6be5.

  • O'Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF, Greenland P, Grundy SM, Hachamovitch R, Pohost GM, Shaw LJ, Weintraub WS, Winters WL Jr. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensus Document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jul;36(1):326-40. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00831-7. No abstract available.

  • Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001 May 16;285(19):2486-97. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486. No abstract available.

  • Wang L, Jerosch-Herold M, Jacobs DR Jr, Shahar E, Detrano R, Folsom AR; MESA Study Investigators. Coronary artery calcification and myocardial perfusion in asymptomatic adults: the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 5;48(5):1018-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.089. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

  • Myerburg RJ, Interian A Jr, Mitrani RM, Kessler KM, Castellanos A. Frequency of sudden cardiac death and profiles of risk. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Sep 11;80(5B):10F-19F. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00477-3.

  • Raggi P, Callister TQ, Cooil B, He ZX, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ, Zelinger A, Mahmarian JJ. Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography. Circulation. 2000 Feb 29;101(8):850-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.8.850.

  • Raggi P, Cooil B, Callister TQ. Use of electron beam tomography data to develop models for prediction of hard coronary events. Am Heart J. 2001 Mar;141(3):375-82. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.113220.

  • Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Hayes SW, Hoffmann U, Lesser JR, Mikati IA, O'Neil BJ, Shaw LJ, Shen MY, Valeti US, Raff GL; CT-STAT Investigators. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 27;58(14):1414-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.068.

  • Cheng VY, Lepor NE, Madyoon H, Eshaghian S, Naraghi AL, Shah PK. Presence and severity of noncalcified coronary plaque on 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients with zero and low coronary artery calcium. Am J Cardiol. 2007 May 1;99(9):1183-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.026. Epub 2007 Mar 15.

  • Gurbel PA, Erlinge D, Ohman EM, Neely B, Neely M, Goodman SG, Huber K, Chan MY, Cornel JH, Brown E, Zhou C, Jakubowski JA, White HD, Fox KA, Prabhakaran D, Armstrong PW, Tantry US, Roe MT; TRILOGY ACS Platelet Function Substudy Investigators. Platelet function during extended prasugrel and clopidogrel therapy for patients with ACS treated without revascularization: the TRILOGY ACS platelet function substudy. JAMA. 2012 Nov 7;308(17):1785-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.17312.

  • Price MJ, Berger PB, Teirstein PS, Tanguay JF, Angiolillo DJ, Spriggs D, Puri S, Robbins M, Garratt KN, Bertrand OF, Stillabower ME, Aragon JR, Kandzari DE, Stinis CT, Lee MS, Manoukian SV, Cannon CP, Schork NJ, Topol EJ; GRAVITAS Investigators. Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial. JAMA. 2011 Mar 16;305(11):1097-105. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.290.

  • Collet JP, Cuisset T, Range G, Cayla G, Elhadad S, Pouillot C, Henry P, Motreff P, Carrie D, Boueri Z, Belle L, Van Belle E, Rousseau H, Aubry P, Monsegu J, Sabouret P, O'Connor SA, Abtan J, Kerneis M, Saint-Etienne C, Barthelemy O, Beygui F, Silvain J, Vicaut E, Montalescot G; ARCTIC Investigators. Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 29;367(22):2100-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209979. Epub 2012 Nov 4.

  • Tantry US, Bonello L, Aradi D, Price MJ, Jeong YH, Angiolillo DJ, Stone GW, Curzen N, Geisler T, Ten Berg J, Kirtane A, Siller-Matula J, Mahla E, Becker RC, Bhatt DL, Waksman R, Rao SV, Alexopoulos D, Marcucci R, Reny JL, Trenk D, Sibbing D, Gurbel PA; Working Group on On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity. Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2261-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.101. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

  • Kuvin JT, Patel AR, Sliney KA, Pandian NG, Sheffy J, Schnall RP, Karas RH, Udelson JE. Assessment of peripheral vascular endothelial function with finger arterial pulse wave amplitude. Am Heart J. 2003 Jul;146(1):168-74. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00094-2.

  • Hamburg NM, Benjamin EJ. Assessment of endothelial function using digital pulse amplitude tonometry. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2009 Jan;19(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2009.03.001.

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

whole blood, plasma

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Platelet Aggregation, SpontaneousCoronary Stenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, PhD.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2018

First Posted

August 15, 2018

Study Start

March 27, 2017

Primary Completion

September 30, 2019

Study Completion

December 10, 2019

Last Updated

March 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations