Study Stopped
Study never commenced
Penicillin Against Flucloxacillin Treatment Evaluation
PANFLUTE
Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of Penicillin Versus Flucloxacillin for Definitive Treatment of Invasive Penicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is theroretical superiority with benzylpenicillin over orther anti-staphylococcal penicillins (ASP) for treatment of penicillin susceptible S. aureus (PSSA) infections due to a lower MIC distribution when compared with ASPs active against PSSA, combined with the ability to obtain higher levels of free non-protein-bound plasma drug concentrations. Although the data to support this theoretical advantage is limited, many clinicians in Australia (and worldwide) use benzylpenicillin for therapy in this situation despite many international guidelines cautioning against this. This uncertainty is significant given that 1) S. aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is associated with a high mortality and significant morbidity, 2) S. aureus is one of the most common organisms isolated from blood cultures, 3) SAB is the most common reason for consultation with an Infectious Disease specialist (which itself has been shown to improve outcomes) and 4) a significant proportion (up to 20%) of SAB isolates in Australia will be reported as susceptible to penicillin, a proportion which appears to be increasing over the past 10 years in Australia and internationally. Given the frequency of PSSA and the associated morbidity and mortality related to SABs in general, a definitive study to determine the optimal therapy for PSSA is required. In a recent survey of Infectious Diseases Physicians and Clinical Microbiologists in Australasia, 87% of respondents were willing to randomise patients to either benzylpenicillin or flucloxacillin for a clinical trial, whist 71% responded that they would switch therapy from flucloxacillin to benzylpenicillin for treatment of PSSA BSIs in clinical practice (unpublished data). Therefore, the investigators see the opportunity to determine the feasibility of a definitive study comparing benzylpenicillin against flucloxacillin (or other ASP) for treatment of PSSA bloodstream infections.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jul 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2020
CompletedNovember 16, 2022
August 1, 2018
5 months
July 22, 2018
November 10, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Feasibility of DOOR
The primary outcome of the study will utilise a desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) to assess superiority of benzylpenicillin against flucloxacillin.
90 day
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Adverse Events
90 day
Mortality
14, 42 and 90 days
Time to defervescence
From randomisation to any period where a temperature is < 37.5 degrees celsius for greater than or equal to 24 hours
Persistent bacteraemia
Day 3 and day 7
Microbiologic relapse
Any period within 90 days from randomisation following a negative blood culture at least 3 days prior
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Benzylpenicillin arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomised to benzylpenicillin will be treated according to Therapeutic Guidelines 15th Edition. During hospitalisation, the standard dose will be 1.8g Q4H IVI for uncomplicated BSIs and 2.4g Q4H for deep-seated or critical illness infections.
Flucloxacillin arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomised to flucloxacillin will be treated according to Therapeutic Guidelines 15th Edition. During hospitalisation, the standard dose will be 2g Q6H IVI or 2g Q4H for deep-seated or criticial illness infections.
Interventions
The study drug will be administered for a minimum of 2 weeks (the minimal currently accepted duration of IV therapy for SAB.) For patients who do not fulfill criteria for 2 weeks of therapy, the duration of treatment will be 4 to 6 weeks and will be made by the treating clinician.
The study drug will be administered for a minimum of 2 weeks (the minimal currently accepted duration of IV therapy for SAB.) For patients who do not fulfill criteria for 2 weeks of therapy, the duration of treatment will be 4 to 6 weeks and will be made by the treating clinician.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bloodstream infection with Staphylococcus aureus susceptible to penicillin and negative for penicillinase by phenotypic methods.
- No more than 72 hours has elapsed since the first positive blood culture was drawn
- Patient is aged 18 years and over
- The patient or approved proxy is able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with a recorded allergy to penicillin including:
- Hypersensitivity type reaction
- Stephens-Johnson syndrome
- Rash
- Urticaria
- Contraindications based upon other recorded allergies, such as gastrointestinal upset, will be at the discretion of the treating clinician
- Patient with significant polymicrobial bacteraemia (skin contaminants excepted)
- Treated with non-curative intent
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Patient currently receiving concomitant antimicrobials with activity against S. aureus which cannot be ceased or substituted.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Brisbane Private Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, Australia
Related Publications (9)
Kirby WM. EXTRACTION OF A HIGHLY POTENT PENICILLIN INACTIVATOR FROM PENICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCI. Science. 1944 Jun 2;99(2579):452-3. doi: 10.1126/science.99.2579.452.
PMID: 17798398BACKGROUNDBaddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, Fowler VG Jr, Tleyjeh IM, Rybak MJ, Barsic B, Lockhart PB, Gewitz MH, Levison ME, Bolger AF, Steckelberg JM, Baltimore RS, Fink AM, O'Gara P, Taubert KA; American Heart Association Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Stroke Council. Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015 Oct 13;132(15):1435-86. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000296. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
PMID: 26373316BACKGROUNDGill VJ, Manning CB, Ingalls CM. Correlation of penicillin minimum inhibitory concentrations and penicillin zone edge appearance with staphylococcal beta-lactamase production. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Oct;14(4):437-40. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.4.437-440.1981.
PMID: 6974738BACKGROUNDKaase M, Lenga S, Friedrich S, Szabados F, Sakinc T, Kleine B, Gatermann SG. Comparison of phenotypic methods for penicillinase detection in Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Jun;14(6):614-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01997.x. Epub 2008 Apr 5.
PMID: 18397333BACKGROUNDCoombs GW, Daly DA, Pearson JC, Nimmo GR, Collignon PJ, McLaws ML, Robinson JO, Turnidge JD; Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance. Community-onset Staphylococcus aureus Surveillance Programme annual report, 2012. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2014 Mar 31;38(1):E59-69. doi: 10.33321/cdi.2014.38.12.
PMID: 25409357BACKGROUNDNissen JL, Skov R, Knudsen JD, Ostergaard C, Schonheyder HC, Frimodt-Moller N, Benfield T. Effectiveness of penicillin, dicloxacillin and cefuroxime for penicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a retrospective, propensity-score-adjusted case-control and cohort analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Aug;68(8):1894-900. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt108. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
PMID: 23599360BACKGROUNDCoombs GW, Daley DA, Thin Lee Y, Pearson JC, Robinson JO, Nimmo GR, Collignon P, Howden BP, Bell JM, Turnidge JD; Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance. Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance Australian Staphylococcus aureus Sepsis Outcome Programme annual report, 2014. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2016 Jun 30;40(2):E244-54. doi: 10.33321/cdi.2016.40.20.
PMID: 27522136BACKGROUNDCheng MP, Rene P, Cheng AP, Lee TC. Back to the Future: Penicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Med. 2016 Dec;129(12):1331-1333. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.01.048. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
PMID: 26924388BACKGROUNDEvans SR, Rubin D, Follmann D, Pennello G, Huskins WC, Powers JH, Schoenfeld D, Chuang-Stein C, Cosgrove SE, Fowler VG Jr, Lautenbach E, Chambers HF. Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) and Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk (RADAR). Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 1;61(5):800-6. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ495. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
PMID: 26113652BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Paterson
UQCCR
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2018
First Posted
August 15, 2018
Study Start
July 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2020
Last Updated
November 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2018-08