NCT03632304

Brief Summary

A major innovation in hand surgery in the last decade is the popularization of Wide Awake Hand Surgery (WAHS). This technique consists of numbing the surgical area with local anesthesia with epinephrine and allowing the patient to actively move their hand intra-operatively to assess the strength and quality of repairs or fixations. Despite its theoretical advantages, the application in clinical practice has seldom spread further than simple hand operations, such as carpal tunnel and trigger finger releases. In many institutions, the current standard of care for hand surgery is the brachial plexus block. The primary objective of the study to directly compare the effects of local anesthesia with minimal sedation, performed by the surgeon, and the brachial plexus block, performed by the anesthesiologist, on patient-reported quality of recovery. Currently, there are no studies in the surgical literature directly comparing patient-reported quality of recovery, post-operative pain control, or time efficiency between local anesthesia and the brachial plexus block in hand surgery. This lack of information is a major impediment to the acceptance and adoption of a simple yet effective anesthesia technique that may increase patient satisfaction and time efficiency in the operating room. This proposed prospective randomized controlled study will quantitatively compare local anesthesia and brachial plexus block on three fronts: 1) patient-reported recovery at 24-hours post-surgery using the validated Quality of Recovery 15 score (QoR-15), 2) post-operative pain and opioid use at 24-hours post-surgery, and 3) nonsurgical time (defined as the time elapsed from one surgery's end time to the next surgery's start time) as a metric for turnover efficiency. The investigators hypothesize that patients randomized to the local anesthesia group will have a more positive recovery experience, a similar pain profile compared to the brachial plexus block despite common beliefs, and a shorter anesthesia-related and nonsurgical time. The importance of patient-centered care cannot be understated in a successful and high-quality health care system. The results of this study will provide valuable information regarding the patient experience during their post- operative recovery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
105

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 8, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 15, 2018

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 17, 2018

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

April 21, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

August 8, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 19, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

hand surgeryquality of recoverylocal anesthesiaregional anesthesiaQoR-15

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of Recovery 15 Questionnaire (QoR-15)

    This psychometrically tested and validated 15-items questionnaire measures patient-reported quality of recovery from surgery and anesthesia on the first post-operative day. Each item consists of a question related to the patient's post-operative recovery and is rated by the patient on a 10-point scale, where 0 means "none of the time" and 10 means "all of the time". The total combined score is obtained from the summation of 15 sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 150, and is used to assess and compare the patient's quality of recovery quantitatively between different interventions. A higher number on the score indicates an improved patient recovery experience. This scale has been validated in the ambulatory surgery setting.

    At 24 hours post-surgery

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Block performance time, onset time, and nonsurgical time

    Within 24 hours of surgery

  • Opioid use at 24 hours after surgery

    At 24 hours post-surgery

Study Arms (2)

Brachial plexus block (infraclavicular)

NO INTERVENTION

The standard of care at our institution. Performed by experienced regional anesthetists.

Local anesthesia with minimal sedation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The comparison group. Performed by the operating surgeon.

Procedure: Local anesthesia with minimal sedation

Interventions

The operating surgeon will perform a digital or wrist block to numb the surgical area prior to the surgery, instead of using a brachial plexus block.

Local anesthesia with minimal sedation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient age 18 and older
  • Hand surgeries distal to carpal bones
  • Trauma and elective cases
  • Under 2 hours estimated surgical duration
  • Consents to research

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refusal
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Surgery proximal to the carpal bones
  • BMI \> 40 kg/m2
  • Non-compressive neurological disease of the upper extremity
  • Daily use of opioids for greater than 2 weeks prior to surgery
  • History of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)
  • Patients with high anxiety or severe post-traumatic stress disorder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Montreal General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada

Location

St-Mary's Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Lalonde DH. Reconstruction of the hand with wide awake surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2011 Oct;38(4):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2011.07.005.

    PMID: 22032599BACKGROUND
  • Lalonde D. Minimally invasive anesthesia in wide awake hand surgery. Hand Clin. 2014 Feb;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Nov 9.

    PMID: 24286736BACKGROUND
  • Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.

    PMID: 23411725BACKGROUND
  • Soberon JR Jr, Crookshank JW 3rd, Nossaman BD, Elliott CE, Sisco-Wise LE, Duncan SF. Distal Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Forearm as an Alternative to Proximal Brachial Plexus Blockade in Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery: A Prospective and Randomized Pilot Study. J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Oct;41(10):969-977. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.092. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

    PMID: 27524691BACKGROUND
  • Meng F, Baradaran A, Jaberi MM, Tran QH, Finlayson R, Luc M, Xu L, Thibaudeau S. Patient-Reported Quality of Recovery after Local Anesthesia versus Brachial Plexus Block in Hand Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Dec 1;152(6):1287-1296. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010688. Epub 2023 May 16.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hand Injuries

Interventions

Anesthesia, Local

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Officials

  • Fanyi Meng, MD

    McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2018

First Posted

August 15, 2018

Study Start

August 17, 2018

Primary Completion

June 30, 2020

Study Completion

June 30, 2020

Last Updated

April 21, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There will be no need to share individual participant data based on the objectives set out by our research.

Locations